Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Evolution works in mysterious ways

Evolution works in mysterious ways

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcomannouncement
286 Posts 22 Posters 27.8k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • O Oakman

    73Zeppelin wrote:

    You're so crazy it's, well, crazy!

    The Illuminati are behind the Theory of Evolution - probably the Swiss Gnomes.

    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

    7 Offline
    7 Offline
    73Zeppelin
    wrote on last edited by
    #30

    For sure. It's the Great Deceit (TM)! Faithfull, lives in his own private fantasy world. He's delusional to some extent. You have to forgive him for his erroneous view of the world. It's his defense mechanism.

    O M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • M Matthew Faithfull

      :laugh: No, it is our message that has remained exactly the same and that of 'evolutionary' ( i.e. unscientifically biased ) biologists that has changed to contradict itself so many times I've lost count. Nice of you to admit that evolution no longer claims the development of the higher organisms form the lower anymore. Yet another false claim laid to rest, that at least is progress. :)

      "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

      7 Offline
      7 Offline
      73Zeppelin
      wrote on last edited by
      #31

      What contradiction? Where is the evidence it's wrong? Where is the evidence for your view? You spout tonnes of words, but they're meaningless.

      M S 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • C Christian Graus

        I'm curious to know if platypus DNA proves evolution to anyone who doesn't already believe in evolution ?

        Christian Graus Please read this if you don't understand the answer I've given you "also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )

        O Offline
        O Offline
        Oakman
        wrote on last edited by
        #32

        Christian Graus wrote:

        I'm curious to know if platypus DNA proves evolution to anyone who doesn't already believe in evolution

        I'm not sure that belief enters into it. The Theory is pretty well spelled out. If, by using it, one is able to more thoroughly understand what happened to create the biosphere as it is today and how/why it changed from what was present two hundred thousand years ago then it is a tool to be used. If stating that the world was created in 4004 BC, complete with aged fossils, and that "There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare [children] to them, the same [became] mighty men which [were] of old, men of renown." provides a methodology by which the biosphere can be understood, then we need to adopt this alternate viewpoint. So far, I've seen no evidence that Evolution doesn't explain the world better than Bishop Usher, ymmv as, obviously, does Mr. Faithful's

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S soap brain

          Matthew Faithfull wrote:

          That's part of the problem but can easily be solved because it is clearly impossible by this mechanism to evolve a mammal from a bacterium. You cannot do that by loosing information, by specializing, or what is known as 'natural slection'. No mechanism == impossible. Evolution was proposed as an explanation for the existence of observed species, not as some para-theoretical self validating mental framework. It fails to provide the explanation and is therefore so much historical junk science.

          Umm, yes you can. A bacterium doesn't 'lose' information, it mutates randomly. There is no purpose in evolution, just a consequence of a slightly different animal being slightly better at surviving. Give me ONE decent example of an organism 'de-evolving', completely counter to Darwinian evolution. Fact is, evolution was proposed before a heap of stuff was known about molecular biology and stuff like that, and it agreed wonderfully. Tell me honestly: if there was actually a decent counter-theory to Natural Selection, do you think scientists would still call it a Law?

          Matthew Faithfull wrote:

          No I'm not, I'm equating information entropy with energy entropy, the rules are same. The unavailability of a genomes information to do work increases over time until it reaches equilibrium. The law refers to a population overall and over time not any specific individual. There is no equivalent of the Sun, no external highly ordered or highly powered source from which to derive function which maintaining the second law.

          The sun comes into it, because it adds energy into a system through photosynthesis and probably other things. Animals eat the plants, digest the sugars and use the extra energy to build cells and move and eat more and whatever. I'm not intimately familiar with the mechanism, and I'm not going to read it now, but I'm sure there are people here who could explain it to you better than me. Wait...did you just say that the sun ISN'T highly powered? :wtf:

          Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing.

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Matthew Faithfull
          wrote on last edited by
          #33

          Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

          A bacterium doesn't 'lose' information, it mutates randomly.

          Fundamental miunderstanding alert. To mutate randomly IS to loose infomration where you have a sufficient information density. All organisms more complex than a bacterium, a no dount some bateria have sufficient information density to be 'unevolvable' by random mutation.

          Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

          The sun comes into it,

          No it does not because it doesn't add information.

          Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

          Wait...did you just say that the sun ISN'T highly powered?

          No, I said it was not involved and there was no equivalent source in terms of information, implying that the sun IS highly powered as it clearly is relative to the energy differentials in our bioshpere. :)

          "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

          S 7 L 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • M Matthew Faithfull

            :laugh: No, it is our message that has remained exactly the same and that of 'evolutionary' ( i.e. unscientifically biased ) biologists that has changed to contradict itself so many times I've lost count. Nice of you to admit that evolution no longer claims the development of the higher organisms form the lower anymore. Yet another false claim laid to rest, that at least is progress. :)

            "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

            O Offline
            O Offline
            Oakman
            wrote on last edited by
            #34

            Wrong, but thanks for playing. As a parting gift, we're giving you a brand-new all-aluminum foil beanie!!!

            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Matthew Faithfull

              Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

              A bacterium doesn't 'lose' information, it mutates randomly.

              Fundamental miunderstanding alert. To mutate randomly IS to loose infomration where you have a sufficient information density. All organisms more complex than a bacterium, a no dount some bateria have sufficient information density to be 'unevolvable' by random mutation.

              Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

              The sun comes into it,

              No it does not because it doesn't add information.

              Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

              Wait...did you just say that the sun ISN'T highly powered?

              No, I said it was not involved and there was no equivalent source in terms of information, implying that the sun IS highly powered as it clearly is relative to the energy differentials in our bioshpere. :)

              "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

              S Offline
              S Offline
              soap brain
              wrote on last edited by
              #35

              Matthew Faithfull wrote:

              Fundamental miunderstanding alert. To mutate randomly IS to loose infomration where you have a sufficient information density. All organisms more complex than a bacterium, a no dount some bateria have sufficient information density to be 'unevolvable' by random mutation.

              No it isn't. Maybe you don't understand the word 'random'. Probably the word 'mutate' as well.

              Matthew Faithfull wrote:

              No it does not because it doesn't add information.

              It adds ENERGY, which is used to build DNA, RNA, proteins, etc.

              Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing.

              M 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • 7 73Zeppelin

                What contradiction? Where is the evidence it's wrong? Where is the evidence for your view? You spout tonnes of words, but they're meaningless.

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Matthew Faithfull
                wrote on last edited by
                #36

                The evidence for my view is the very evidence you yourself could link to for your view if you were capable of anything other than carping. My words mean what they say, how about yours?

                "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                7 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • 7 73Zeppelin

                  What contradiction? Where is the evidence it's wrong? Where is the evidence for your view? You spout tonnes of words, but they're meaningless.

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  soap brain
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #37

                  Wow, creepy, he's turning into Ilion...

                  Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing.

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • 7 73Zeppelin

                    For sure. It's the Great Deceit (TM)! Faithfull, lives in his own private fantasy world. He's delusional to some extent. You have to forgive him for his erroneous view of the world. It's his defense mechanism.

                    O Offline
                    O Offline
                    Oakman
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #38

                    73Zeppelin wrote:

                    Faithfull, lives in his own private fantasy world

                    While it's hard to understand exactly what he's babbling about, I think he's claiming that the neaderthals were a higher life form and we have devolved from them. Hard to think of Adam and Eve with single eyebrows, unbridged noses, and weak chins.

                    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                    7 M 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • M Matthew Faithfull

                      Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                      A bacterium doesn't 'lose' information, it mutates randomly.

                      Fundamental miunderstanding alert. To mutate randomly IS to loose infomration where you have a sufficient information density. All organisms more complex than a bacterium, a no dount some bateria have sufficient information density to be 'unevolvable' by random mutation.

                      Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                      The sun comes into it,

                      No it does not because it doesn't add information.

                      Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                      Wait...did you just say that the sun ISN'T highly powered?

                      No, I said it was not involved and there was no equivalent source in terms of information, implying that the sun IS highly powered as it clearly is relative to the energy differentials in our bioshpere. :)

                      "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                      7 Offline
                      7 Offline
                      73Zeppelin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #39

                      Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                      To mutate randomly IS to loose infomration where you have a sufficient information density. All organisms more complex than a bacterium, a no dount some bateria have sufficient information density to be 'unevolvable' by random mutation.

                      Look at this complete nonsense. What is "information" in your opinion? Does white noise contain information? What is "information density"? How have you measured information density in order to arrive at the above conclusions. What is "sufficient information density"? Why does "information density" restrict "unevolvability"? Through what mechanism is that enforced? You're a total nutter. Is it any wonder I have no patience for you and the other idiot?

                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • O Oakman

                        73Zeppelin wrote:

                        Faithfull, lives in his own private fantasy world

                        While it's hard to understand exactly what he's babbling about, I think he's claiming that the neaderthals were a higher life form and we have devolved from them. Hard to think of Adam and Eve with single eyebrows, unbridged noses, and weak chins.

                        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                        7 Offline
                        7 Offline
                        73Zeppelin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #40

                        I have no clue what he's babbling about. It only makes sense to him in the same way that grunts and growls make sense to people raised by wolves.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • O Oakman

                          Wrong, but thanks for playing. As a parting gift, we're giving you a brand-new all-aluminum foil beanie!!!

                          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Matthew Faithfull
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #41

                          Well at least you try to debate before resorting to insults and random crap, a minor improvement on some people but pathetic never the less.

                          "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                          O 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S soap brain

                            Wow, creepy, he's turning into Ilion...

                            Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing.

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Matthew Faithfull
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #42

                            Zepplin turning into Ilion :laugh: The 2 sides of unreason I suppose. I'm sure they actually have much more in common than either would like to admit; Bright, angry, self important, utterly convinced of their own superiority of resonsing but not actually able to sustain an argument for more than 2 steps wihtout loosing their cool. Just you're average smart 7 years olds I suppose ;)

                            "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                            7 S 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • M Matthew Faithfull

                              The evidence for my view is the very evidence you yourself could link to for your view if you were capable of anything other than carping. My words mean what they say, how about yours?

                              "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                              7 Offline
                              7 Offline
                              73Zeppelin
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #43

                              Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                              My words mean what they say, how about yours?

                              Yes, your words mean just that: nothing. Look, I don't care if you believe in God, the Great Turtle, the Garden Gnomes or the three Elves that make the popping sound in your Rice Krispies. Just stop pretending you have some kind of Magical Mystical Evidence (TM) that refutes the established fact that species evolve. It's irritating and sinks you to the level of the Great Idiot that I was forced to deal with the other day. Maybe you know the politics of the UKIP, maybe you've read the Bible, fine. What you have no understanding of is the theory of evolution. Just admit it and we can move on, or I can add you the list of morons on here that aren't worth acknowledging.

                              T 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Matthew Faithfull

                                Zepplin turning into Ilion :laugh: The 2 sides of unreason I suppose. I'm sure they actually have much more in common than either would like to admit; Bright, angry, self important, utterly convinced of their own superiority of resonsing but not actually able to sustain an argument for more than 2 steps wihtout loosing their cool. Just you're average smart 7 years olds I suppose ;)

                                "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                soap brain
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #44

                                Um, no, YOU'RE turning into Ilion. You're beginning to sound exactly like him. 73Zeppelin, on the other hand, is completely reasonable, and mostly in his right mind! :laugh:

                                Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing.

                                M 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Matthew Faithfull

                                  Zepplin turning into Ilion :laugh: The 2 sides of unreason I suppose. I'm sure they actually have much more in common than either would like to admit; Bright, angry, self important, utterly convinced of their own superiority of resonsing but not actually able to sustain an argument for more than 2 steps wihtout loosing their cool. Just you're average smart 7 years olds I suppose ;)

                                  "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                                  7 Offline
                                  7 Offline
                                  73Zeppelin
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #45

                                  Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                  Zepplin turning into Ilion

                                  He meant you. I see you have the same reading comprehension/misrepresentation problem as Idiot. What is it with you fundies and your affinity for lies?

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Matthew Faithfull

                                    Well at least you try to debate before resorting to insults and random crap, a minor improvement on some people but pathetic never the less.

                                    "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                                    O Offline
                                    O Offline
                                    Oakman
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #46

                                    Yes, I find it hard to give up on folks, even when their head has twisted all the way around and they're vomitting pea soup.

                                    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • O Oakman

                                      Christian Graus wrote:

                                      I'm curious to know if platypus DNA proves evolution to anyone who doesn't already believe in evolution

                                      I'm not sure that belief enters into it. The Theory is pretty well spelled out. If, by using it, one is able to more thoroughly understand what happened to create the biosphere as it is today and how/why it changed from what was present two hundred thousand years ago then it is a tool to be used. If stating that the world was created in 4004 BC, complete with aged fossils, and that "There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare [children] to them, the same [became] mighty men which [were] of old, men of renown." provides a methodology by which the biosphere can be understood, then we need to adopt this alternate viewpoint. So far, I've seen no evidence that Evolution doesn't explain the world better than Bishop Usher, ymmv as, obviously, does Mr. Faithful's

                                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                      C Offline
                                      C Offline
                                      Christian Graus
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #47

                                      Well, you're presenting an interesting dichotomy. What if not everyone who doesn't believe 100% in evolution believes in a young earth ? ( The Bible doesn't actually say that, BTW ).

                                      Christian Graus Please read this if you don't understand the answer I've given you "also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )

                                      O 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S soap brain

                                        Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                        Fundamental miunderstanding alert. To mutate randomly IS to loose infomration where you have a sufficient information density. All organisms more complex than a bacterium, a no dount some bateria have sufficient information density to be 'unevolvable' by random mutation.

                                        No it isn't. Maybe you don't understand the word 'random'. Probably the word 'mutate' as well.

                                        Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                        No it does not because it doesn't add information.

                                        It adds ENERGY, which is used to build DNA, RNA, proteins, etc.

                                        Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing.

                                        M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Matthew Faithfull
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #48

                                        Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                        Maybe you don't understand the word 'random'

                                        Oh believe me I understand it very well, that's the whole point, random, undirected, arbitrary, stochastic, probabalistic and therefore destructive to a non random, useful, structured information set.

                                        Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                        It adds ENERGY, which is used to build DNA, RNA, proteins, etc.

                                        Which does not add information only increases the rate at which it is copied and thereby damaged, increase the solar activity and you get more rapid de-evolution :) Instead of assuming I don't understand basic scientific terms becuase that's easy, you should perhaps, as I said, set aside some time in your busy life to find out for yourself whether evolution is scientific or a dangerous pseudo religious delusion. ( Hint: asking someone subject to the delusion isn't going to teach you anything, try going about it scientifically :-D )

                                        "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                                        7 S 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • 7 73Zeppelin

                                          Matthew Faithfull wrote:

                                          To mutate randomly IS to loose infomration where you have a sufficient information density. All organisms more complex than a bacterium, a no dount some bateria have sufficient information density to be 'unevolvable' by random mutation.

                                          Look at this complete nonsense. What is "information" in your opinion? Does white noise contain information? What is "information density"? How have you measured information density in order to arrive at the above conclusions. What is "sufficient information density"? Why does "information density" restrict "unevolvability"? Through what mechanism is that enforced? You're a total nutter. Is it any wonder I have no patience for you and the other idiot?

                                          M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Matthew Faithfull
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #49

                                          73Zeppelin wrote:

                                          Is it any wonder I have no patience for you and the other idiot?

                                          No, but that's an issue you need to deal with. Patience is a hard lesson so be careful what you ask for.

                                          "The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage." Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)

                                          7 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups