to "Colin Davies"!!
-
ouch !! so well explained lets analyse it. since you haven't said anything silly this week
This implies I believe he has not said anything silly this week, however it does not imply that I believe he has ever said anything silly. The implication that I believe he has never said anything silly is definitly not an implication that he has said something silly. This concludes Silly Philosophy 101. Next week you will be tested on your understanding of relevance to arguements that have no object. Regardz Colin J DaviesSonork ID 100.9197:Colin
I am sick of fighting with Martin, I think I will ignore his posts from here on in, and spend the time working on articles instead. Christian Graus
Colin Davies wrote: Next week you will be tested on your undersading of relevance to arguements that have no object. Is the week after that learning about answers with no questions? "I was bored last week and a thought occured to me: Why is it that there is a government bureau which oversees alcohol, tobacco, and firearms? I was bored enough to call up the regional office of said bureau... I asked the man who answered the phone "What wine goes best with an M-16?" He did his best to be helpful, "That depends. What are you smoking?" -Unknown
-
Colin Davies wrote: Next week you will be tested on your undersading of relevance to arguements that have no object. Is the week after that learning about answers with no questions? "I was bored last week and a thought occured to me: Why is it that there is a government bureau which oversees alcohol, tobacco, and firearms? I was bored enough to call up the regional office of said bureau... I asked the man who answered the phone "What wine goes best with an M-16?" He did his best to be helpful, "That depends. What are you smoking?" -Unknown
Daniel Ferguson wrote: Is the week after that learning about answers with no questions? Correct !! Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
I am sick of fighting with Martin, I think I will ignore his posts from here on in, and spend the time working on articles instead. Christian Graus
-
ouch !! so well explained lets analyse it. since you haven't said anything silly this week
This implies I believe he has not said anything silly this week, however it does not imply that I believe he has ever said anything silly. The implication that I believe he has never said anything silly is definitly not an implication that he has said something silly. This concludes Silly Philosophy 101. Next week you will be tested on your understanding of relevance to arguements that have no object. Regardz Colin J DaviesSonork ID 100.9197:Colin
I am sick of fighting with Martin, I think I will ignore his posts from here on in, and spend the time working on articles instead. Christian Graus
This implies I believe he has not said anything silly this week, however it does not imply that I believe he has ever said anything silly. The implication that I believe he has never said anything silly is definitly not an implication that he has said something silly. i see.you mean sometimes you believe what someone said was silly, but finally it turned out that the remarks were not silly at all. i emphasize once again that if you find what i am saying is silly,please let me know. it is important for me.thanks.
-
This implies I believe he has not said anything silly this week, however it does not imply that I believe he has ever said anything silly. The implication that I believe he has never said anything silly is definitly not an implication that he has said something silly. i see.you mean sometimes you believe what someone said was silly, but finally it turned out that the remarks were not silly at all. i emphasize once again that if you find what i am saying is silly,please let me know. it is important for me.thanks.
OK, :rose: I should have used a lot more smileys to show I was jesting ( similar to joking ) with you. I was not joking about you. No, I didn't think you had said anything silly. Also note, please that in English often silly is not a derrogatory term. And my offer to help you was sincere as I'd hate to see someone else taken advantage of by some of the people who sell trash on the web. Lets make peace and call this a "Cultural Buffer Overflow" :rose: Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
I am sick of fighting with Martin, I think I will ignore his posts from here on in, and spend the time working on articles instead. Christian Graus
-
OK, :rose: I should have used a lot more smileys to show I was jesting ( similar to joking ) with you. I was not joking about you. No, I didn't think you had said anything silly. Also note, please that in English often silly is not a derrogatory term. And my offer to help you was sincere as I'd hate to see someone else taken advantage of by some of the people who sell trash on the web. Lets make peace and call this a "Cultural Buffer Overflow" :rose: Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
I am sick of fighting with Martin, I think I will ignore his posts from here on in, and spend the time working on articles instead. Christian Graus
Colin Davies wrote: Cultural Buffer Overflow Does that let you run arbitary code? -- Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit!
-
Hey, now you've made me feel bad.
-
Colin Davies wrote: Cultural Buffer Overflow Does that let you run arbitary code? -- Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit!
benjymous wrote: Does that let you run arbitary code? I have no idea as i just created the term on the fly ( google doesn't seem to find it) At a guess, the Error handling must catch overflows or some weird stuff is output.:) Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
I am sick of fighting with Martin, I think I will ignore his posts from here on in, and spend the time working on articles instead. Christian Graus
-
benjymous wrote: Does that let you run arbitary code? I have no idea as i just created the term on the fly ( google doesn't seem to find it) At a guess, the Error handling must catch overflows or some weird stuff is output.:) Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
I am sick of fighting with Martin, I think I will ignore his posts from here on in, and spend the time working on articles instead. Christian Graus
You'd probably need a reboot -- Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit!
-
Hello zhoujun, Don't worry about what Colin said. He was mostly joking. And "silly" is not exactly an abusive word. I mean hey, we all post silly stuff every day. I guess I post more silly stuff than others on account of my having posted more posts than anyone else :-) So relax. Sometimes there are language barriers. Dont take every sentence at it's literal meaning. The english language is really weird sometimes. For example if I say that C++ is a piece of cake, it doesn't mean I am hungry or that I am gonna eat cake. It means C++ is damn simple and easy. Got it? Cheer up, :rose: Nish :-)
Author of the romantic comedy Summer Love and Some more Cricket [New Win] Review by Shog9 Click here for review[NW]
Nishant S wrote: The english language is really weird sometimes. true... :-D:-D:-D:-D Mauricio Ritter - Brazil Sonorking now: 100.13560 Trank :beer: The alcohol is one of the greatest enemys of man, but a man who flee from his enemys is a coward. :beer:
-
OK, :rose: I should have used a lot more smileys to show I was jesting ( similar to joking ) with you. I was not joking about you. No, I didn't think you had said anything silly. Also note, please that in English often silly is not a derrogatory term. And my offer to help you was sincere as I'd hate to see someone else taken advantage of by some of the people who sell trash on the web. Lets make peace and call this a "Cultural Buffer Overflow" :rose: Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
I am sick of fighting with Martin, I think I will ignore his posts from here on in, and spend the time working on articles instead. Christian Graus
Colin Davies wrote: "Cultural Buffer Overflow" I like that, Colin! Nicely phrased...:-D "Knock, knock." "Who's there?" "Recursion." "Recursion who?" "Knock, knock..."