Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Russo-Georgian War and Balance of Power

Russo-Georgian War and Balance of Power

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcom
25 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 7 73Zeppelin

    Diego Moita wrote:

    Exactly. And if it is not a "great return to power" please show me a strong reaction of the West against it. The issue here is not how they did it. Is the fact that NATO can't/won't do anything against it so they can and will continue doing it. You're ignoring all the consequences this will have on Ukraine, Belarus, Baltic States and even perhaps Kazakhstan.

    The U.S. and Poland just signed a missile defense agreement despite threats from the Russians of pre-emptive nuclear attacks. Why do you think NATO can't/won't do anything about it? So far a member country has not been attacked and I think they've been taking the proper stance in dealing with this issue for the time being. I think Russia is ignoring the consequences that this will have for them. Threats of cutting off heating gas only go so far.

    D Offline
    D Offline
    Diego Moita
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    I won't reply to your personal perceptions, it is useless. You read what you want. Let's wait and see if your conclusions are correct. But note this: the trend for NATO was expansion. I see that trend as blocked by Russia. I will consider my perception correct if Saakashvili falls and is substituted by a Russian friendly government and if Ukraine gives up on entering NATO.


    Of all forms of sexual aberration, the most unnatural is abstinence.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • O Oakman

      Rob Graham wrote:

      The Russians may find they have a more dangerous competitor on the world scene than the US.

      If only China had enough energy resources.

      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Rob Graham
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      They have one heck of a lot of coal, are drilling off Cuba, and may be casting an eye on some of that Russian Petrol in the Russian east...Putin should be nervous.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K KaRl

        Nikolay Denisov wrote:

        But that does not mean that we should not even try to reveal things happening behind the scene.

        It's probably why so many of us stick here, in the Soapbox: we love to talk about things we have no idea about :-D;)

        Nikolay Denisov wrote:

        the article can be discussed

        And this is a very interesting article, thanks for the link.

        Nikolay Denisov wrote:

        I doubt they were democratically elected.

        Neither EU or OSCE observers called them frauds, contrary to the Russian election (Putin getting more of 99% of the votes in Chechnya? No kidding!). Each time observers said it was not perfect, but elections were not cheated.

        Nikolay Denisov wrote:

        What invasions do you mean?

        Ukraine: parts of Ukraine during the partitions of Poland, 1920 when independent Ukraine was absorbed by USSR. AFAIK after WW2 there were pro-independence Ukrainians who fought till 1954. Georgia: 1801, 1921. Poland: 1772, 1793, 1795, 1945. I think that all of Russia's neighbors are afraid of Russia, from the Baltic country to Japan - except Belarus, but being the last European dictatorship, I don't think it's something really significant.

        Military justice is to justice what military music is to music. Fold with us! ¤ flickr

        N Offline
        N Offline
        Nikolay Denisov
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Ka?l wrote:

        we love to talk about things we have no idea about

        Oh yeah! :)))

        Ka?l wrote:

        Neither EU or OSCE observers called them frauds, contrary to the Russian election (Putin getting more of 99% of the votes in Chechnya? No kidding!). Each time observers said it was not perfect, but elections were not cheated.

        I remember how Boris Eltsin was re-elected in 1996. That was a real farce! Eltsin was surrounded by a dozen of American political strategists that had to help him to win the election. The TV, mostly controled by Eltsin, was brainwashing people 24 hours a day 7 days week trying to make them vote for Eltsin... But Eltsin has lost. Actually, he got less than 40% of votes. But officials announced him as the election winner. And no one from the West said that elections were cheated. Yes, I know about 99% of the votes in Chechnya. And yes, I have to confirm that elections here in Russia are not fair, to put it mildly. :(

        Ka?l wrote:

        Ukraine: parts of Ukraine during the partitions of Poland, 1920 when independent Ukraine was absorbed by USSR. AFAIK after WW2 there were pro-independence Ukrainians who fought till 1954. Georgia: 1801, 1921. Poland: 1772, 1793, 1795, 1945.

        I've got your point. As far as Russia-Ukraine relations, they are so complicated that we will need a separate thread to discuss it. :)

        Regards, Nikolay

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • O Oakman

          Diego Moita wrote:

          Exactly. And if it is not a "great return to power" please show me a strong reaction of the West against it. The issue here is not how they did it. Is the fact that NATO can't/won't do anything against it so they can and will continue doing it.

          NATO couldn't/wouldn't do anything if the aggression was against a member, not just a potential member. It is a moribund shell of what it once was.

          Diego Moita wrote:

          You're ignoring all the consequences this will have on Ukraine, Belarus, Baltic States and even perhaps Kazakhstan.

          I am amazed at the gonads being shown by the Ukraine and Poland under the circumstances.

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

          M Offline
          M Offline
          MidwestLimey
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          Oakman wrote:

          I am amazed at the gonads being shown by the Ukraine and Poland under the circumstances.

          There are some subtle differences, such as the Ukrainian military being 200,000 strong rather than 20,000 and Poland being a (geographically defendable) member of NATO. The Ukraine's primary weakness is a divided and vitriolic politcal scene, I somehow doubt even the Russian speaking denizens of the east would much appreciate Russian tanks appearing across the border. Simply put: Georgia was easy, with limited scope for (short term) costs.


          I'm largely language agnostic


          After a while they all bug me :doh:


          O 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M MidwestLimey

            Oakman wrote:

            I am amazed at the gonads being shown by the Ukraine and Poland under the circumstances.

            There are some subtle differences, such as the Ukrainian military being 200,000 strong rather than 20,000 and Poland being a (geographically defendable) member of NATO. The Ukraine's primary weakness is a divided and vitriolic politcal scene, I somehow doubt even the Russian speaking denizens of the east would much appreciate Russian tanks appearing across the border. Simply put: Georgia was easy, with limited scope for (short term) costs.


            I'm largely language agnostic


            After a while they all bug me :doh:


            O Offline
            O Offline
            Oakman
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            MidwestLimey wrote:

            Simply put: Georgia was easy, with limited scope for (short term) costs.

            That makes a lot of sense to me.

            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups