WaitForMultipleObjects
-
Greetings all, While coding for a certain logic, I encountered an error (application crash-not often reproducible) which arose due to the fact that an object of a class was still being accessed by one or more threads. Now the proposed solution is to signal the thread and wait for its completion. What I have is only the thread id. Is it possible to get the handle to the thread using it's id(I can't do this at the time of thread creation as it is already implemented and I can't change the way it is done) so that I can use WaitForMultipleObjects and wait for the threads to finish their processing before objects of the class are destroyed? Any help / pointers : appreciated.
Somethings seem HARD to do, until we know how to do them. ;-)_AnShUmAn_
-
Greetings all, While coding for a certain logic, I encountered an error (application crash-not often reproducible) which arose due to the fact that an object of a class was still being accessed by one or more threads. Now the proposed solution is to signal the thread and wait for its completion. What I have is only the thread id. Is it possible to get the handle to the thread using it's id(I can't do this at the time of thread creation as it is already implemented and I can't change the way it is done) so that I can use WaitForMultipleObjects and wait for the threads to finish their processing before objects of the class are destroyed? Any help / pointers : appreciated.
Somethings seem HARD to do, until we know how to do them. ;-)_AnShUmAn_
Do you intend this [^]? :)
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles]