Am I overreacting?
-
Funny ain't it. I have little doubt that they are mocking religion, but it is funny nonetheless. Puts a new spin on those silly sounding Old Testament laws. You HAVE to see the bestiality and rape sections.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
I don't think they are mocking it. The second slide for the Proof of Virginity is funny with the Jerry Springer take of it.
"The clue train passed his station without stopping." - John Simmons / outlaw programmer "Real programmers just throw a bunch of 1s and 0s at the computer to see what sticks" - Pete O'Hanlon "Not only do you continue to babble nonsense, you can't even correctly remember the nonsense you babbled just minutes ago." - Rob Graham
-
Thumping, Yes! Sorry. Try Exodus 21:22 "If men struggle with each other and strike a woman with child so that she has a miscarriage, yet there is no further injury, he shall surely be fined as the woman’s husband may demand of him, and he shall pay as the judges decide" Fined! not Executed. Execution was a punishment for murder, Fining was for a Civil Offence. Hope that helps.
------------------------------------ We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. - Aesop
According to Blue Letter Bible, the only version of the Bible that applies "miscarriage" to this verse is the RSV. The KJV (and all other versions, even the literal translation) seem to agree that the implication is that the baby is born prematurely but otherwise unharmed. [^] Interesting discussion, though. What's fascinating to me is that two men fighting and inadvertently causing a baby to be born was somehow common enough that the legal management of that situation actually needed to be written down. Go figure.
- F
-
This does not mean that the Bible considers unborn children as not human life. This VERY specific case of the accidental death of the child as a result of two men fighting is what this deals with. If you look at how other cases of accidental death are handled, you will see that accidental death was not considered murder in any situation. To help you understand this, given your childlike understanding of religion, this[^] should help you out as it's illustrated with LEGOs (which is friggin hillarious by the way). You also cannot argue (assuming that you concede that it is human life, and I'm not holding my breath) that this means that it's not murder. Since the accidental example is not even remotely analogous to abortion.
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.
BoneSoft wrote:
To help you understand this, given your childlike understanding of religion, this[^] should help you out as it's illustrated with LEGOs (which is friggin hillarious by the way).
:laugh: I have not seen the bricktestament site before, thanks for sharing.
Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read
-
BoneSoft wrote:
To help you understand this, given your childlike understanding of religion, this[^] should help you out as it's illustrated with LEGOs (which is friggin hillarious by the way).
:laugh: I have not seen the bricktestament site before, thanks for sharing.
Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life. Me blog, You read
I just found it. But it looks like the greatest thing since sliced bread. Oddly enough, their FAQ says that they get requests all the time to use it for Sunday Schools! I'm guessing they avoid a lot of the content[^]. :laugh:
Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.