Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. RIAA sue ISPs for not Censoring the Web

RIAA sue ISPs for not Censoring the Web

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
questionhtmlcomhostingannouncement
14 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Raskolnikov
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    First they sued ISP hosting illegal content. (Which is fine by me.) Then they sued those hyperlinking to illegal content(DeCCS). Then they sue those linking to site linking the sites linking to content. They are also suing the makers of file swapping programs. (What is next outlawing FTP?). Now they are suing AT&T, Sprint and UUNET for allowing illegal content to travel over the internet. http://news.com.com/2100-1023-954176.html?tag=fd\_top http://www.theregus.com/content/6/26015.html The RIAA want the right to censor the internet. Am I the only one scared by this?

    C M L B 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • R Raskolnikov

      First they sued ISP hosting illegal content. (Which is fine by me.) Then they sued those hyperlinking to illegal content(DeCCS). Then they sue those linking to site linking the sites linking to content. They are also suing the makers of file swapping programs. (What is next outlawing FTP?). Now they are suing AT&T, Sprint and UUNET for allowing illegal content to travel over the internet. http://news.com.com/2100-1023-954176.html?tag=fd\_top http://www.theregus.com/content/6/26015.html The RIAA want the right to censor the internet. Am I the only one scared by this?

      C Offline
      C Offline
      ColinDavies
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Raskolnikov wrote: (What is next outlawing FTP?). I wonder if they will start suing hackers who break into your system and steal stuff. Regardz Colin J Davies

      Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin

      You are the intrepid one, always willing to leap into the fray! A serious character flaw, I might add, but entertaining. Said by Roger Wright about me.

      R 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Raskolnikov

        First they sued ISP hosting illegal content. (Which is fine by me.) Then they sued those hyperlinking to illegal content(DeCCS). Then they sue those linking to site linking the sites linking to content. They are also suing the makers of file swapping programs. (What is next outlawing FTP?). Now they are suing AT&T, Sprint and UUNET for allowing illegal content to travel over the internet. http://news.com.com/2100-1023-954176.html?tag=fd\_top http://www.theregus.com/content/6/26015.html The RIAA want the right to censor the internet. Am I the only one scared by this?

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Michael Dunn
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I'm scared because US lawmakers are clueless enough to give RIAA the power they want. :wtf: --Mike-- Just released - RightClick-Encrypt v1.3 - Adds fast & easy file encryption to Explorer My really out-of-date homepage Sonork-100.19012 Acid_Helm

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C ColinDavies

          Raskolnikov wrote: (What is next outlawing FTP?). I wonder if they will start suing hackers who break into your system and steal stuff. Regardz Colin J Davies

          Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin

          You are the intrepid one, always willing to leap into the fray! A serious character flaw, I might add, but entertaining. Said by Roger Wright about me.

          R Offline
          R Offline
          Raskolnikov
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I don't mind hacker who cause damage getting sued or even going to jail. I think that they should be able to sue an ISP that doesn't imediately pull an infrigning web site. But suing those providinc the infrastructure is going a little too far. I could care less about a Chinease web site hosting MP3s, but this could set a terrible precedent. Maybe next time a company will want the ISPs to block a web site that criticized its products or business practices, perhapse claiming that the site is libelous or infringes on its trademarks. I have already read of dozens of cases in which individuals where sued for libel after posting on a forum. It doesn't even matter whether the company has a case or not. Usually they start of fighting, but eventually as their legal bills mount they are forced to settle because they simply can't affort to keep fighting. I am sure Microsoft knows of a few web sites that it would like disapeared. I don't know about you, but I like the internet the way it is, free and uncensored.

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Michael Dunn

            I'm scared because US lawmakers are clueless enough to give RIAA the power they want. :wtf: --Mike-- Just released - RightClick-Encrypt v1.3 - Adds fast & easy file encryption to Explorer My really out-of-date homepage Sonork-100.19012 Acid_Helm

            C Offline
            C Offline
            ColinDavies
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I think that is a world wide phenomenon now though not just with law makers ... but many decision makers. Even in an abstract sense now they do not understand the implications of the techology that is arriving. :wtf: Regardz Colin J Davies

            Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin

            You are the intrepid one, always willing to leap into the fray! A serious character flaw, I might add, but entertaining. Said by Roger Wright about me.

            R 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Raskolnikov

              First they sued ISP hosting illegal content. (Which is fine by me.) Then they sued those hyperlinking to illegal content(DeCCS). Then they sue those linking to site linking the sites linking to content. They are also suing the makers of file swapping programs. (What is next outlawing FTP?). Now they are suing AT&T, Sprint and UUNET for allowing illegal content to travel over the internet. http://news.com.com/2100-1023-954176.html?tag=fd\_top http://www.theregus.com/content/6/26015.html The RIAA want the right to censor the internet. Am I the only one scared by this?

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Why not just let the RIAA, Disney etc. run the US government. Oops, too late.......... X| Oh - and will they sue foreign ISP as well ? Elaine (fluffy tigress emoticon) Would you like to meet my teddy bear ?

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Raskolnikov

                I don't mind hacker who cause damage getting sued or even going to jail. I think that they should be able to sue an ISP that doesn't imediately pull an infrigning web site. But suing those providinc the infrastructure is going a little too far. I could care less about a Chinease web site hosting MP3s, but this could set a terrible precedent. Maybe next time a company will want the ISPs to block a web site that criticized its products or business practices, perhapse claiming that the site is libelous or infringes on its trademarks. I have already read of dozens of cases in which individuals where sued for libel after posting on a forum. It doesn't even matter whether the company has a case or not. Usually they start of fighting, but eventually as their legal bills mount they are forced to settle because they simply can't affort to keep fighting. I am sure Microsoft knows of a few web sites that it would like disapeared. I don't know about you, but I like the internet the way it is, free and uncensored.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Isn't there something in the US constitution about free speech...... Elaine (fluffy tigress emoticon) Would you like to meet my teddy bear ?

                R L 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  Isn't there something in the US constitution about free speech...... Elaine (fluffy tigress emoticon) Would you like to meet my teddy bear ?

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Roger Wright
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Trollslayer wrote: Isn't there something in the US constitution about free speech...... What, that old thing? The Liberal Democrats have all but emasculated it by now; the remnants are being dismantled by the Judiciary... Keep in touch - when rights are well and truly dead in this country, we'll hold a wake (if we're allowed to) - I'll see to it you get an invitation. "Knock, knock." "Who's there?" "Recursion." "Recursion who?" "Knock, knock..."

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Raskolnikov

                    First they sued ISP hosting illegal content. (Which is fine by me.) Then they sued those hyperlinking to illegal content(DeCCS). Then they sue those linking to site linking the sites linking to content. They are also suing the makers of file swapping programs. (What is next outlawing FTP?). Now they are suing AT&T, Sprint and UUNET for allowing illegal content to travel over the internet. http://news.com.com/2100-1023-954176.html?tag=fd\_top http://www.theregus.com/content/6/26015.html The RIAA want the right to censor the internet. Am I the only one scared by this?

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    Bruce Duncan
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    We can only hope that this[^] will be the case. :) Though I think Hilary Rosen's head on the body of a tick would have been far more appropriate.

                    Bruce Duncan, CP#9088, CPUA 0xA1EE, Sonork 100.10030
                    'ugly naked women are good, when i'm not around, in front of someone else' - Shog9

                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C ColinDavies

                      I think that is a world wide phenomenon now though not just with law makers ... but many decision makers. Even in an abstract sense now they do not understand the implications of the techology that is arriving. :wtf: Regardz Colin J Davies

                      Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin

                      You are the intrepid one, always willing to leap into the fray! A serious character flaw, I might add, but entertaining. Said by Roger Wright about me.

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Russell Morris
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Colin^Davies wrote: they do not understand the implications of the techology that is arriving. I agree with you 100%. I have a pessimistic/optimistic take on it, however. The only way they'll ever figure it out (good) is by screwing it up (bad) and realizing what a horrible thing they have done. Failure is the best teacher, after all - it's just that her lessons are so unpleasant to learn. -- Russell Morris "Have you gone mad Frink? Put down that science pole!"

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B Bruce Duncan

                        We can only hope that this[^] will be the case. :) Though I think Hilary Rosen's head on the body of a tick would have been far more appropriate.

                        Bruce Duncan, CP#9088, CPUA 0xA1EE, Sonork 100.10030
                        'ugly naked women are good, when i'm not around, in front of someone else' - Shog9

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Russell Morris
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Bruce Duncan wrote: Though I think Hilary Rosen's head on the body of a tick would have been far more appropriate. It's a better metaphor, I must admit / But flies do make a living on piles of shit ;) -- Russell Morris "Have you gone mad Frink? Put down that science pole!"

                        B 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Why not just let the RIAA, Disney etc. run the US government. Oops, too late.......... X| Oh - and will they sue foreign ISP as well ? Elaine (fluffy tigress emoticon) Would you like to meet my teddy bear ?

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Russell Morris
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Trollslayer wrote: Oh - and will they sue foreign ISP as well ? It will probably escalate to that stupidity, at some point :( But keep in mind that in no way means that they will win the suit. And even if they do, I'd like to see them try and enfore it :laugh: But I'm sure there will be entirely different takes on that situation when it's a US entity suing a non-US entity for their web content. I never heard too much anti-French-Govt sentiment when they told E-Bay to censor it's content (Perhaps it existed outside the US as well, but I just didn't hear about it)... I hope the roar will be much, much louder the next go-round. The internet is not a place for nation-states to play politics. -- Russell Morris "Have you gone mad Frink? Put down that science pole!"

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            Isn't there something in the US constitution about free speech...... Elaine (fluffy tigress emoticon) Would you like to meet my teddy bear ?

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Trollslayer wrote: Isn't there something in the US constitution about free speech...... Of course, there are limits to everything. I'm curious, does the company you work for give away it's IP? Do you get paid? I thought so.

                            Mike Mullikin :beer: You can't really dust for vomit. Nigel Tufnel - Spinal Tap

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R Russell Morris

                              Bruce Duncan wrote: Though I think Hilary Rosen's head on the body of a tick would have been far more appropriate. It's a better metaphor, I must admit / But flies do make a living on piles of shit ;) -- Russell Morris "Have you gone mad Frink? Put down that science pole!"

                              B Offline
                              B Offline
                              Bruce Duncan
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Actually I rather like yours too :-)

                              Bruce Duncan, CP#9088, CPUA 0xA1EE, Sonork 100.10030
                              'ugly naked women are good, when i'm not around, in front of someone else' - Shog9

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups