Now that BHO has bollocks'd the swearing in of the most important job in the world...

BoneSoft

And they should have all been held accountable for that. I don't know how Lincoln got away with throwing dissenting journalists in jail. And if he had just taken office, I'd be complaining about him instead.

Oakman wrote:

while I know you have received a message from God regarding Obama's citizenship, it would appear that most of the rest of us didn't get the memo.

That's the point, nobody got the memo. The memo has been sealed. But God wasn't the one who sealed his records. God wasn't one of his two half sisters who cited two different hospitals he was born at neither of which existed in 61. God wasn't his grandmother who said she was present at his birth in Kenya. God wasn't the one who let him into Afghanistan at a time when noone could with a US passport. God wasn't the one who got him into school in Indonesian when you had to be a citizen there to do so. I don't question his citizenship, I question the class of his citizenship, as the evidence and the Constitution pretty much require. And as multiple Supreme Court cases suggest, thankfully I'm not alone. Too bad they'll likely be swept aside without consideration. But make no mistake, this isn't sour grapes as many here would like to dismissively suggest, I want the Constitution and the law, without them we have nothing. After crying for 8 years about Bush stealing elections, I guess the left felt oblidged to go a big step further in retaliation. I have no doubt that nothing will be done about it, since nobody seems to care about the Constitution any more. And because of that, maybe the majority of voters will get what they deserve, it's just too bad the rest of us will be equally punished. Maybe the unwarranted ridiculous optimism surrounding him won't have been in vain, I certainly hope that's the case. But it won't just be PC when he's called the first African American president. I would absolutely love to be proven wrong, and that would only take him ponying up a couple of easily attainable documents that he should have been required to produce in the first place. If he would only do that, then I'd have to sit back and take his policies as legitimate.

Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

oilFactotum

BoneSoft wrote:

I shouldn't have to apologize for that.

No, you shouldn't. But I am curious where your concern for the constitition has been for the last 8 year.

BoneSoft

It's always been there. In what ways do you see that it was violated? Other than Cheney's view of his job description, which I'm aware of.

Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

oilFactotum

Illegal domestic surveillance program and torture to name 2 violations.

Oakman

BoneSoft wrote:

I'm sorry, apparently my tin foil beanie paid off.

Most of us have looked at the same evidence that Adnan did and we decided that Bush didn't order 9/11. Now we have looked at the same evidence you have, and we decided that it doesn't prove that Obama's birth record is a forgery.

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

Oakman

BoneSoft wrote:

Maybe the unwarranted ridiculous optimism surrounding him won't have been in vain

Depends on what you mean, "in vain." There is no chance that he can wave a magic wand and get us out of the mess we have put ourselves into. And anyone who thinks that he can or will will have to discover all over again that there is no Santa Claus. On the other hand, it would seem to me that he stands a decent chance of having the intelligence and wisdom to ameliorate the effects of this crisis. The biggest threat to this, it seems to me comes from Pelosi and Reid. And the biggest advantage he will have in any struggle with them is his inordinate popularity - in which they do not share.

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

Rob Graham

BoneSoft wrote:

I would absolutely love to be proven wrong, and that would only take him ponying up a couple of easily attainable documents that he should have been required to produce in the first place. If he would only do that, then I'd have to sit back and take his policies as legitimate.

If this isn't enough, then it is likely that you really don't wish to accept the truth[^]

BoneSoft

OK, right to privacy. But... I don't remember anything in the Constitution agaist torture, or anything of rights offorded by the Constitution for those who aren't citizens or legal residents. What else ya got?

Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

BoneSoft

I didn't say it was. But the short form, altered or not, doesn't give relevant details. If, as the likely story goes, he was born in Kenya and flown to Hawaii, he would have the document that's posted on factcheck and wouldn't have the documents that he refuses to produce. Did you just equate my concerns to an Adnan conspiracy theory? Cuz them's fightin wurds!

Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

BoneSoft

One web site? Really? If factcheck.org isn't good enough for me then I'm obviously unhindged? What do they say about the JFK assassination, cuz that's a burning question I'd love to have cleared up too. Why isn't the Supreme Court sending all it's cases to FactCheck? I guess if it's good enough for the DNC... I can find sites that say otherwise, is two enough to trump your one? Or would I need more to counter FactCheck's cool name? You do realize that factcheck hasn't always been right, right?

Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

BoneSoft

Oakman wrote:

And anyone who thinks that he can or will will have to discover all over again that there is no Santa Claus.

I think that may be a larger portion of his voters and foreign supporters than you imagine.

Oakman wrote:

On the other hand, it would seem to me that he stands a decent chance of having the intelligence and wisdom to ameliorate the effects of this crisis.

I really hope so. I really do hope you are right.

Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

Rob Graham

Did you even read that NON-PARTISAN independant sites analysis of the evidence? did you look at the pictures of the birth Cert from Hawaii, or read the quote from the Head of the Hawaii Dept of health and the registrar of vital statistics? No, just pull down that tin-foil hat tighter. Damn I'm glad I left the Republican fold. You, Stan and Ilion can have it. enjoy. BTW - the cert copies have been provided to the idiots doing the suing. TheY are demanding what Hawaii does not offer: the long form cert. The documents suitable to satisfy everyone else including the US State Dept are just not good enough for them (or you), which is why their suits draw little besides disdain and laughter.

Oakman

BoneSoft wrote:

Did you just equate my concerns to an Adnan conspiracy theory? Cuz them's fightin wurds!

I considered using Rosie O'Donnell as the other example, but I knew I'd really piss you off then.

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

BoneSoft

Rob Graham wrote:

Did you even read that NON-PARTISAN independant sites analysis of the evidence?

Yes I have, multiple times over the last few months.

Rob Graham wrote:

TheY are demanding what Hawaii does not offer: the long form cert.

And I've seen a copy of a long form from the same year. However in this case, I'm sure you read "We tried to ask the Hawaii DOH why they only offer the short form, among other questions, but they have not given a response." There is plenty of evidence to warrant seeking proof of his actual birth place. All it would take is a hospital name and a doctor. Which has been offered by multiple family members, all giving different names of hospitals that didn't exist in 61. And no hospital currently there has any record of him. What's more contemptable, the fact that I want to know or that you don't? I dunno, maybe I've held onto this long enough, and partly for partisan reasons I'll admit. I quess I'd just like to have some of that hope crap everybody keeps raving about lately.

Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

BoneSoft

You're right, Adnan was a much gentler dig. That hurts Jon. I'm going to go back to work and call you dirty names for a while.

Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

Oakman

BoneSoft wrote:

I'm going to go back to work and call you dirty names for a while.

Now you sound like my ex wife. :omg:

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

Lost User

minus 100 man points!

___________________________________________ .\\axxx (That's an 'M')

Oakman

BoneSoft wrote:

What's more contemptable

Why does contempt have to enter into it? Unless one of you just got down from Mt Sinai with the answer engraved on a stone tablet, I'm gonna think that there can be reasonable - if vehment - differences of opinion. (If either of you do have that tablet, I'll just kiss this Golden Bull g'bye and say no more.)

Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

BoneSoft

Oakman wrote:

Why does contempt have to enter into it?

Good question, you could ask my univoting shadow if he had the nuggets to reveal himself. Or any of the people who respond with "disdain and laughter" to an issue that can't possibly be valid since the media isn't all over it *sarcasm for those playing at home*. What kind of nut-job would believe that somebody without the legal credentials to run for president would have gotten this far. Surely there must be some reasonable explaination for why he refuses to produce those credentials. It must just be sour grapes on the part of those who question "the One".

Oakman wrote:

I'm gonna think that there can be reasonable - if vehment - differences of opinion.

Normally yes, but this has nothing to do with opinion. There's a Constitutional requirement that is very specific, and there's a set of documents that would prove that requirement met. The documents have not been produced, or at least have been sealed from the view of us peons for whatever reason. The only room for opinion here is whether or not the Constitution should be ignored. And I wouldn't have thought a true American alive would have considered that. I apparently was way wrong.

Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

oilFactotum

BoneSoft wrote:

I don't remember anything in the Constitution agaist torture

Cruel and unusual punishment. Remember now?

BoneSoft wrote:

anything of rights offorded by the Constitution for those who aren't citizens or legal residents.

Oh, there are plenty of rights afforded to non-citizens. Like not being tortured for one. :rolleyes:

BoneSoft wrote:

What else ya got?

That's enough. You asked for unconstitutional acts by Bush and I gave two very serious ones. One, if fact - torture, is also a war crime. And all you can respond with is a retorical 'So what?' :rolleyes: