Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. AP analysis of Obama's Monday presser

AP analysis of Obama's Monday presser

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
helpquestioncomannouncement
39 Posts 10 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Mike Gaskey

    AP is being unusually objective.[^] While there's no question there are problems, BS and pork doesn't fix anything. The stimulus bill as it currently sits in the Senate is in excess of 750 pages. There's little or no chance that any of the fools voting for or against it have even read it. So here we go, plunging head long into a problem that isn't completely understood with a solution no one has even read. Sort of like going into production with code you haven't tested. Now that works, right?

    Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

    W Offline
    W Offline
    wolfbinary
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    I think "Beyond that, it's unlikely the nation will ever know how many jobs are saved as a result of the stimulus. While it's clear when jobs are abolished, there's no economic gauge that tracks job preservation." from the article said it best. Even if you don't agree with the stimulus, or any stimulus package for that matter, I don't think there is a way to directly correlate them with any stimulus package piece directly.

    Mike Gaskey wrote:

    solution no one has even read

    I don't think they ever read the bills they vote for unless they author them, and even then I wonder.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • realJSOPR realJSOP

      Mike Gaskey wrote:

      The stimulus bill as it currently sits in the Senate is in excess of 750 pages.

      I wonder if they've started making electronic versions available. It would certainly be a cool thing to write a program called "BaconBuster", that would automatically search for pork in the specified document.

      "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
      -----
      "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Reagan Conservative
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      Well, when this "stimulus" package doesn't "stimulate" anything more than inflation, will Obama stand up and say "I messed up again?" Good luck to us all --- we're going to need it!

      AF Pilot

      realJSOPR B J 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • O Oakman

        Mike Gaskey wrote:

        So here we go, plunging head long into a problem that isn't completely understood with a solution no one has even read.

        It concerns me greatly that Obama's primary response to any criticism raised by Republicans is to blame them for the mess (they certainly helped) and to claim that he is the little Dutch boy, single-handedly holding back the incursion of the Seas of Destruction while anyone who opposes the bill is busy drilling more holes in the dike. Regardless of who won the election, the Republicans in both the House and the Senate may have some insight to share (With the possible exception of Pete Sessions who announced that the Republicans are studying the techniques of Al Qaeda :wtf: ) I keep trying to plow through the bill and read some commentary on it at the same time. I don't pretend that I can say that I understand it totally. But I keep wondering why, if some of this stuff will not have any impact on the US economy for the next two years, it can't be excised from this bill which has been labeled "super-urgent," and considered later, after we have had time to take a look at what the impact of those parts of the bill that can be started up immediately have had. A cut in payroll taxes could be implemented almost immediately and while it might not be as sexy as a new icebreaker for the Navy, it damn well would put more money in the hands of the people who need it, and if they put it in the bank rather than spending it, then the bankers can spend it by giving out loans to people who want to make big ticket purchases. There are shovel-ready infrastructure projects simply waiting for funding. And there are people who need to use the safety net, so let us make sure that states have the funding needed for unemployment benefits, even if they have to turn the airconditioning down and let the temps climb above 68F.

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

        W Offline
        W Offline
        wolfbinary
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        Oakman wrote:

        Pete Sessions who announced that the Republicans are studying the techniques of Al Qaeda WTF )

        WTF, guy's an a$$hat! Where did you hear about this at?

        O 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • O Oakman

          Mike Gaskey wrote:

          So here we go, plunging head long into a problem that isn't completely understood with a solution no one has even read.

          It concerns me greatly that Obama's primary response to any criticism raised by Republicans is to blame them for the mess (they certainly helped) and to claim that he is the little Dutch boy, single-handedly holding back the incursion of the Seas of Destruction while anyone who opposes the bill is busy drilling more holes in the dike. Regardless of who won the election, the Republicans in both the House and the Senate may have some insight to share (With the possible exception of Pete Sessions who announced that the Republicans are studying the techniques of Al Qaeda :wtf: ) I keep trying to plow through the bill and read some commentary on it at the same time. I don't pretend that I can say that I understand it totally. But I keep wondering why, if some of this stuff will not have any impact on the US economy for the next two years, it can't be excised from this bill which has been labeled "super-urgent," and considered later, after we have had time to take a look at what the impact of those parts of the bill that can be started up immediately have had. A cut in payroll taxes could be implemented almost immediately and while it might not be as sexy as a new icebreaker for the Navy, it damn well would put more money in the hands of the people who need it, and if they put it in the bank rather than spending it, then the bankers can spend it by giving out loans to people who want to make big ticket purchases. There are shovel-ready infrastructure projects simply waiting for funding. And there are people who need to use the safety net, so let us make sure that states have the funding needed for unemployment benefits, even if they have to turn the airconditioning down and let the temps climb above 68F.

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Mike Gaskey
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          Oakman wrote:

          It concerns me greatly that Obama's

          is as dishonest as the day is long. Here's something interesting buried in the mush of stimulating words. no big deal, just an underhanded way of taking control of the healthcare system - without debate.[^]

          Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

          O R R B 4 Replies Last reply
          0
          • W wolfbinary

            Oakman wrote:

            Pete Sessions who announced that the Republicans are studying the techniques of Al Qaeda WTF )

            WTF, guy's an a$$hat! Where did you hear about this at?

            O Offline
            O Offline
            Oakman
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            Picked it up on Joe Scarborough's show. And like a lot of hearsay, I got it wrong. :-O It wasn't Senator Pete Sessions, it was Congressman Jeff Sessions and it wasn't Al Qaeda, it was the Taliban. However, the gentleman in question is a Republican. Source[^]

            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

            W 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O Oakman

              Picked it up on Joe Scarborough's show. And like a lot of hearsay, I got it wrong. :-O It wasn't Senator Pete Sessions, it was Congressman Jeff Sessions and it wasn't Al Qaeda, it was the Taliban. However, the gentleman in question is a Republican. Source[^]

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

              W Offline
              W Offline
              wolfbinary
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              Thanks. I always appreciate sources to go along with the information.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Mike Gaskey

                Oakman wrote:

                It concerns me greatly that Obama's

                is as dishonest as the day is long. Here's something interesting buried in the mush of stimulating words. no big deal, just an underhanded way of taking control of the healthcare system - without debate.[^]

                Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

                O Offline
                O Offline
                Oakman
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                Mike Gaskey wrote:

                Here's something interesting buried in the mush of stimulating words. no big deal, just an underhanded way of taking control of the healthcare system - without debate.[

                Wow. Good catch. I wonder if anyone at AARP has heard about this?

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Mike Gaskey

                  Oakman wrote:

                  It concerns me greatly that Obama's

                  is as dishonest as the day is long. Here's something interesting buried in the mush of stimulating words. no big deal, just an underhanded way of taking control of the healthcare system - without debate.[^]

                  Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Rob Graham
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  That alone would explain the unseemly haste to push through this sausage of spending delights as rapidly as possible without time for debate or examination.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Reagan Conservative

                    Well, when this "stimulus" package doesn't "stimulate" anything more than inflation, will Obama stand up and say "I messed up again?" Good luck to us all --- we're going to need it!

                    AF Pilot

                    realJSOPR Offline
                    realJSOPR Offline
                    realJSOP
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    He's already starting to blame the republicans for delaying it. He certainly won't shoulder any of the when it fails. It will be the republicans' fault because they delayed its passage.

                    "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
                    -----
                    "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • realJSOPR realJSOP

                      He's already starting to blame the republicans for delaying it. He certainly won't shoulder any of the when it fails. It will be the republicans' fault because they delayed its passage.

                      "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
                      -----
                      "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Reagan Conservative
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      You may be right about that --- sadly, there will be many who can't see the writing on the wall, and agree with him.

                      AF Pilot

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Reagan Conservative

                        Well, when this "stimulus" package doesn't "stimulate" anything more than inflation, will Obama stand up and say "I messed up again?" Good luck to us all --- we're going to need it!

                        AF Pilot

                        B Offline
                        B Offline
                        BoneSoft
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        Nope, he'll say those 3 dirty Republicans passed it. Or blame the Republicans who didn't vote for it for somehow breaking it. Or just blame Bush for "the last eight years", some more. Or he may be more subtle and point to the 40% of the bill dedicated to "tax cuts" which is code for "Republican's fault". Funny, he got elected by promising "tax cuts" and now it's a "failed economic philosophy".


                        Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B BoneSoft

                          Nope, he'll say those 3 dirty Republicans passed it. Or blame the Republicans who didn't vote for it for somehow breaking it. Or just blame Bush for "the last eight years", some more. Or he may be more subtle and point to the 40% of the bill dedicated to "tax cuts" which is code for "Republican's fault". Funny, he got elected by promising "tax cuts" and now it's a "failed economic philosophy".


                          Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Reagan Conservative
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          Yeah, he's got the "doublespeak" portion down pat! '1984', here we come!

                          AF Pilot

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • O Oakman

                            Mike Gaskey wrote:

                            So here we go, plunging head long into a problem that isn't completely understood with a solution no one has even read.

                            It concerns me greatly that Obama's primary response to any criticism raised by Republicans is to blame them for the mess (they certainly helped) and to claim that he is the little Dutch boy, single-handedly holding back the incursion of the Seas of Destruction while anyone who opposes the bill is busy drilling more holes in the dike. Regardless of who won the election, the Republicans in both the House and the Senate may have some insight to share (With the possible exception of Pete Sessions who announced that the Republicans are studying the techniques of Al Qaeda :wtf: ) I keep trying to plow through the bill and read some commentary on it at the same time. I don't pretend that I can say that I understand it totally. But I keep wondering why, if some of this stuff will not have any impact on the US economy for the next two years, it can't be excised from this bill which has been labeled "super-urgent," and considered later, after we have had time to take a look at what the impact of those parts of the bill that can be started up immediately have had. A cut in payroll taxes could be implemented almost immediately and while it might not be as sexy as a new icebreaker for the Navy, it damn well would put more money in the hands of the people who need it, and if they put it in the bank rather than spending it, then the bankers can spend it by giving out loans to people who want to make big ticket purchases. There are shovel-ready infrastructure projects simply waiting for funding. And there are people who need to use the safety net, so let us make sure that states have the funding needed for unemployment benefits, even if they have to turn the airconditioning down and let the temps climb above 68F.

                            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                            B Offline
                            B Offline
                            BoneSoft
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            Oakman wrote:

                            But I keep wondering why, if some of this stuff will not have any impact on the US economy for the next two years, it can't be excised from this bill which has been labeled "super-urgent,"

                            Simple. Stimulus is not what he's interested in. Funding his 4 year agenda is.


                            Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Mike Gaskey

                              Oakman wrote:

                              It concerns me greatly that Obama's

                              is as dishonest as the day is long. Here's something interesting buried in the mush of stimulating words. no big deal, just an underhanded way of taking control of the healthcare system - without debate.[^]

                              Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              Reagan Conservative
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              I just sent off a scathing email to AARP (as I'm a member, and getting close to retirement). I'll be goddamned if any bureaucrat in Washington is going to tell MY doctor what he/she can/cannot do regarding my health! Christ, we thought Hillary was the problem in health care. Guess we were wrong --- it's F*CKING DASCHLE!!! Now I'm really mad! And sorry, Jon, I cannot wait another 6 months to not whine about this administration! In less than a month, this butthead is leading us to ruination! I hope this is "the change we can believe in" for all those who voted for Barry! This is dejavu all over again. The Carter years are soon going to be upon us once again. High inflation, higher interest rates for sure, prolonged recession, and we'll probably get our asses kicked around the world again. I hope we have enough cruise missiles to fire off to show that "we mean business".

                              AF Pilot

                              R O 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • M Mike Gaskey

                                Oakman wrote:

                                It concerns me greatly that Obama's

                                is as dishonest as the day is long. Here's something interesting buried in the mush of stimulating words. no big deal, just an underhanded way of taking control of the healthcare system - without debate.[^]

                                Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

                                B Offline
                                B Offline
                                BoneSoft
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                Yep, I saw this last week in another article: How the stimulus bill could kill you[^]


                                Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R Reagan Conservative

                                  I just sent off a scathing email to AARP (as I'm a member, and getting close to retirement). I'll be goddamned if any bureaucrat in Washington is going to tell MY doctor what he/she can/cannot do regarding my health! Christ, we thought Hillary was the problem in health care. Guess we were wrong --- it's F*CKING DASCHLE!!! Now I'm really mad! And sorry, Jon, I cannot wait another 6 months to not whine about this administration! In less than a month, this butthead is leading us to ruination! I hope this is "the change we can believe in" for all those who voted for Barry! This is dejavu all over again. The Carter years are soon going to be upon us once again. High inflation, higher interest rates for sure, prolonged recession, and we'll probably get our asses kicked around the world again. I hope we have enough cruise missiles to fire off to show that "we mean business".

                                  AF Pilot

                                  R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  Rob Graham
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #20

                                  The Senate just passed the "American Economic Recovery and re-investment act". Welcome to Medicare rationing UK style. You have been officially fucked.

                                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R Rob Graham

                                    The Senate just passed the "American Economic Recovery and re-investment act". Welcome to Medicare rationing UK style. You have been officially fucked.

                                    R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    Reagan Conservative
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #21

                                    Well, now I am really pissed off. I am going to make the rest of my life's work in defeating every SOB (both Republican and Democrat) who voted for this bill. They are not worthy to be called "Congressmen", and I'm not sure I would claim them to be "Americans" either. It's time for these SOBs to see what life is really like and hold down a job besides on the public dole. I am thinking of turning each and every one of them in to the IRS as tax cheats. I probably will be right at least 50% of the time. We need to set up an organization that keeps tabs on these idiots' coming and goings. We need some people at Andrews AFB to let the rest of know when these "public servants" ride back and forth from their homes to DC on government jets, instead of taking a commercial flight on an economy fare. We need people in the states of these morons and let the rest of the world know what they are up to. Where their campaign money comes from --- anything that can be used against them at election time. And we need to find HONEST CITIZENS who have the knowledge and capacity to run for public office that care more about The United States of America than their own fat wallets. Anyone who comes out of office as a millionaire, when he wasn't one when he went to DC, needs to have their life investigated for the time they were in DC. It's time we, the people, stand up and take back OUR country from these pimps and whores.

                                    AF Pilot

                                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R Reagan Conservative

                                      Well, now I am really pissed off. I am going to make the rest of my life's work in defeating every SOB (both Republican and Democrat) who voted for this bill. They are not worthy to be called "Congressmen", and I'm not sure I would claim them to be "Americans" either. It's time for these SOBs to see what life is really like and hold down a job besides on the public dole. I am thinking of turning each and every one of them in to the IRS as tax cheats. I probably will be right at least 50% of the time. We need to set up an organization that keeps tabs on these idiots' coming and goings. We need some people at Andrews AFB to let the rest of know when these "public servants" ride back and forth from their homes to DC on government jets, instead of taking a commercial flight on an economy fare. We need people in the states of these morons and let the rest of the world know what they are up to. Where their campaign money comes from --- anything that can be used against them at election time. And we need to find HONEST CITIZENS who have the knowledge and capacity to run for public office that care more about The United States of America than their own fat wallets. Anyone who comes out of office as a millionaire, when he wasn't one when he went to DC, needs to have their life investigated for the time they were in DC. It's time we, the people, stand up and take back OUR country from these pimps and whores.

                                      AF Pilot

                                      R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      Rob Graham
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #22

                                      I recommend the "No-I" voting rule. The only way to reform our government is to impose term limits as voters. No incumbent should receive a vote. If they did well, then "thanks and take a rest", if they were shit, then "don't let the door hit you in the rear". Senators are the worst because of the length of term- half way through the 2nd term they all decide they "know whats best" and are entitiled to the job. Vote "No-I".

                                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R Rob Graham

                                        I recommend the "No-I" voting rule. The only way to reform our government is to impose term limits as voters. No incumbent should receive a vote. If they did well, then "thanks and take a rest", if they were shit, then "don't let the door hit you in the rear". Senators are the worst because of the length of term- half way through the 2nd term they all decide they "know whats best" and are entitiled to the job. Vote "No-I".

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        Reagan Conservative
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #23

                                        I see the investment community has voted --- -370 points, or so. Congrats, Mr. President, you seem to be getting your 'legislation' that you wanted. Seems there are quite a few who would rather not have it. Just where is the 'stimulus' in this piece of crap? Please show us how many jobs have been saved in a) the 1st 6 months, and b) the 1st year. I can't wait to see the numbers! ALL YOU WHO VOTED FOR OBAMA!!! --- Please tell us where the 'stimulus' is in this bill, besides the tax breaks and the welfare disguised as "earned income credit". I'm talking about the plans to spend this money that is going to create those 4 million jobs.

                                        AF Pilot

                                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R Reagan Conservative

                                          I see the investment community has voted --- -370 points, or so. Congrats, Mr. President, you seem to be getting your 'legislation' that you wanted. Seems there are quite a few who would rather not have it. Just where is the 'stimulus' in this piece of crap? Please show us how many jobs have been saved in a) the 1st 6 months, and b) the 1st year. I can't wait to see the numbers! ALL YOU WHO VOTED FOR OBAMA!!! --- Please tell us where the 'stimulus' is in this bill, besides the tax breaks and the welfare disguised as "earned income credit". I'm talking about the plans to spend this money that is going to create those 4 million jobs.

                                          AF Pilot

                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          Rob Graham
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #24

                                          Obama's not the problem, just the poster child. Ths started in 2006, in response to the republican Party's complete abrogation of its ideals. We ended up trading one set of thieves for another.

                                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups