Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Change

Change

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
question
83 Posts 17 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Christian Graus

    Stan Shannon wrote:

    Sure, Christian, Castro had nothing to do with it

    Yeah, Cuba would be in exactly the same state of poverty if it was allowed to import medicines, etc. The US has nothing to do with it.

    Stan Shannon wrote:

    Canada is nothing but a welfare stat

    Canada has real welfare, as do most other countries. That this makes them failed right now, is a question for debate.

    Stan Shannon wrote:

    The Chinese were intelligent enough to accept that they needed a new economic model if not a social one

    That was kind of my point - failure depends on your criteria. I'd hate to live in China, I don't pretend that their communist system is one that equates to freedom or equity. But, is that failure, or is their economic success, a guage of success in general ? Depends on your POV

    Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Stan Shannon
    wrote on last edited by
    #58

    Christian Graus wrote:

    The US has nothing to do with it.

    They are communists. They are lucky they got off as easy as they have.

    Christian Graus wrote:

    Canada has real welfare, as do most other countries. That this makes them failed right now, is a question for debate.

    It does, you have to be blind not to see it.

    Christian Graus wrote:

    But, is that failure, or is their economic success, a guage of success in general ? Depends on your POV

    The communist ideal failed there as it has every where else it has been tried. It doesn't work. Thats not the fault of the US. Communism is no different from Fascism. They are inherently evil philosophies which should be opposed by freedom loving people.

    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Stan Shannon

      Christian Graus wrote:

      The US has nothing to do with it.

      They are communists. They are lucky they got off as easy as they have.

      Christian Graus wrote:

      Canada has real welfare, as do most other countries. That this makes them failed right now, is a question for debate.

      It does, you have to be blind not to see it.

      Christian Graus wrote:

      But, is that failure, or is their economic success, a guage of success in general ? Depends on your POV

      The communist ideal failed there as it has every where else it has been tried. It doesn't work. Thats not the fault of the US. Communism is no different from Fascism. They are inherently evil philosophies which should be opposed by freedom loving people.

      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Christian Graus
      wrote on last edited by
      #59

      Stan Shannon wrote:

      They are communists. They are lucky they got off as easy as they have.

      Exactly. People are not allowed to decide on what system of government they want, under the US Empire.

      Stan Shannon wrote:

      It does, you have to be blind not to see it.

      Apparently. It would be better if they just took the poor out into the snow and left them to die.

      Stan Shannon wrote:

      They are inherently evil philosophies which should be opposed by freedom loving people.

      'freedom loving people' means people who have your views, not the freedom to choose their own, right ?

      Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

      O S 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • S Stan Shannon

        No. The poor should be cared for by society.

        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Christian Graus
        wrote on last edited by
        #60

        In a vague, nebulous, sort of way ? Or in an orderly, consistent sort of way ?

        Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Stan Shannon

          Oakman wrote:

          The Supremes have done nothing they haven't been doing since about the time of the War of 1812, yet you rail against their unconstitutionality incessantly.

          Thats because they represent the greatest threat to our way of life.

          Oakman wrote:

          There's nothing in it about which part of the Constitution takes priority.

          Precisely my point.

          Oakman wrote:

          And, in point of fact, the war powers are given by the Constitution to the Congress.

          So? The president is the commander in chief. He is answerable to congress, as are the courts. If things are not working properly the fault is with congress. It is their job to deal with those who exceed their authority.

          Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

          O Offline
          O Offline
          Oakman
          wrote on last edited by
          #61

          None of your answers were responsive, they didn't even have anything to do with the lines of discussion you'd set up. I think that's a symptom of bi-polar distress. At any rate, I've got socks to sort.

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

          S 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • O Oakman

            None of your answers were responsive, they didn't even have anything to do with the lines of discussion you'd set up. I think that's a symptom of bi-polar distress. At any rate, I've got socks to sort.

            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Stan Shannon
            wrote on last edited by
            #62

            Oakman wrote:

            None of your answers were responsive

            Yeah, they were.

            Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O Oakman

              None of your answers were responsive, they didn't even have anything to do with the lines of discussion you'd set up. I think that's a symptom of bi-polar distress. At any rate, I've got socks to sort.

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stan Shannon
              wrote on last edited by
              #63

              Oakman wrote:

              I've got socks to sort.

              YOu sort socks? Why don't you act like a man and just stuff them all in the drawyer together?

              Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Christian Graus

                In a vague, nebulous, sort of way ? Or in an orderly, consistent sort of way ?

                Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

                S Offline
                S Offline
                Stan Shannon
                wrote on last edited by
                #64

                Christian Graus wrote:

                In a vague, nebulous, sort of way ? Or in an orderly, consistent sort of way ?

                In the measured,judgemental way that all workable wealfare systems must have.

                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Christian Graus

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  They are communists. They are lucky they got off as easy as they have.

                  Exactly. People are not allowed to decide on what system of government they want, under the US Empire.

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  It does, you have to be blind not to see it.

                  Apparently. It would be better if they just took the poor out into the snow and left them to die.

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  They are inherently evil philosophies which should be opposed by freedom loving people.

                  'freedom loving people' means people who have your views, not the freedom to choose their own, right ?

                  Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

                  O Offline
                  O Offline
                  Oakman
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #65

                  Christian Graus wrote:

                  'freedom loving people' means people who have your views, not the freedom to choose their own, right ?

                  Of course. Stan is terrified by the thought of actual freedom.

                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C Christian Graus

                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                    They are communists. They are lucky they got off as easy as they have.

                    Exactly. People are not allowed to decide on what system of government they want, under the US Empire.

                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                    It does, you have to be blind not to see it.

                    Apparently. It would be better if they just took the poor out into the snow and left them to die.

                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                    They are inherently evil philosophies which should be opposed by freedom loving people.

                    'freedom loving people' means people who have your views, not the freedom to choose their own, right ?

                    Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista.

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Stan Shannon
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #66

                    Christian Graus wrote:

                    Exactly. People are not allowed to decide on what system of government they want, under the US Empire.

                    Works for me.

                    Christian Graus wrote:

                    Apparently. It would be better if they just took the poor out into the snow and left them to die.

                    That is not the alternative to the collectivst welfare state, it is the consequence of it.

                    Christian Graus wrote:

                    'freedom loving people' means people who have your views, not the freedom to choose their own, right ?

                    It means people who understand that freedom and personal responsibility mean exactly the same thing.

                    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • O Oakman

                      Christian Graus wrote:

                      'freedom loving people' means people who have your views, not the freedom to choose their own, right ?

                      Of course. Stan is terrified by the thought of actual freedom.

                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Stan Shannon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #67

                      Oakman wrote:

                      Stan is terrified by the thought of actual freedom.

                      Which would be what - anal sex? Abortions?

                      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                      O 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • O Oakman

                        Bassam Saoud wrote:

                        I understand your point of view but the world is very inter connected. You have american workers working in Foriegn countries that may be affected by such a change of policy. The answer in my humble opinion is to monitor the policy instead of shutting down the borders.

                        More than 11 million Americans are looking for work. Yet our government allows more than 1.5 million foreign workers a year to legally enter the U.S. for jobs. That doesn't include millions of illegal foreign workers. Since H1bs can stay in this country legally for six years, 9 million jobs would open up if we sent 'em all home. The entire justification for the H1B program was because there weren't enough trained Americans to fill those jobs. It was less than the truth then and it is a total lie, now. Most countries have very stringent and very stringently enforced laws about hiring foreigners. And most employers are allowed to discriminate against anyone who does not speak like a native. Why the hell should we be any different???

                        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                        B Offline
                        B Offline
                        Bassam Saoud
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #68

                        Are those people (who lost their job) in the IT industry? You can close the H1B program and burn it if you want but the real question is, with IT blooming (and recession-proof by the way, I need to find that article), do you have enough EXPERIENCED/HIGHLY EDECUATED people to do the job. But again who should be allowed to hire Foriegn professionals? My answer to this question is companies that have a full american staff and long history in the market. You think this is an american problem. well its not. If you go to freakin Lebanon, you will find that there are foriegn workers brought into the country. The simple fact is that all companies are investing in Technology and hence IT is in high demand.

                        modified on Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:31 AM

                        O 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Mike Gaskey

                          Bassam Saoud wrote:

                          Not sure how Israel or hamas can justify what they did.

                          I agree, as far as Hamas is concerned - animals. Israel had no choice and my only criticism s that they waited far too long. My apologies if it sounds as though I have no sympathy for the Palestinians themselves, I do but.

                          Mike - typical white guy. The USA does have universal healthcare, but you have to pay for it. D'oh. Thomas Mann - "Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." The NYT - my leftist brochure. Calling an illegal alien an “undocumented immigrant” is like calling a drug dealer an “unlicensed pharmacist”. God doesn't believe in atheists, therefore they don't exist.

                          B Offline
                          B Offline
                          Bassam Saoud
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #69

                          The conflict have not started yesterday. There are United Nation resolutions (some signed by your country) that establishes the right of the palestanians to exist in an independent and viable state. Palestanians dont have a state , its not a gift from the west , its their right. That being said, I also belong to a minority in the east and I do know how hard it is to survive when there is a very little common culture between us and the majority. So what I am trying to say is that I do understand Israel's need of security but I am not blind. Israelis have proved over and over again that they dont want peace and they proved it in the latest elections because they know they can kill their way out of it. But again, Is hamas the answer? Fuck no. Do I respect them ? of course not. And this is not my stance on CP , open a news agency and you will know the deep division in the region about that subject. Do I respect Israel? No I dont. To me hamas and co, Israel and co or any other extremist entity are a danger to the world and should be punished.

                          modified on Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:34 AM

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • O Oakman

                            Stan Shannon wrote:

                            We used not to have any of that and things worked fine.

                            Yep. We didn't have any of that fancy healthcare either. Doctors were barbers and drugists sold snake oil to cure whatever ailed you.

                            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                            B Offline
                            B Offline
                            Bassam Saoud
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #70

                            Oakman wrote:

                            Yep. We didn't have any of that fancy healthcare either. Doctors were barbers and drugists sold snake oil to cure whatever ailed you.

                            funny like always Oakman :laugh: :laugh:

                            O 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Dan Neely

                              No more than in the standard Rep/Dem switcharoo we do almost every 4 to 8 years.

                              Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              CSS_Shadow
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #71

                              dan neely wrote:

                              No more than in the standard Rep/Dem switcharoo we do almost every 4 to 8 years.

                              And do you have any idea what the standard is?

                              D 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • T Tim Craig

                                BoneSoft wrote:

                                However, if he could get through an interview without saying "uh" and "yaknow" 400,000 times, that actually would surprise me.

                                Yeah, I bet your really miss that divinely inspired oratory of Dub. :laugh:

                                "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

                                B Offline
                                B Offline
                                BoneSoft
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #72

                                Yes. Watching him speak was at least intertaining. Obamanation is just painful to listen to. Can't they get him a nice voice over? "Tonight the part of Comrade Oh-bama will be played by Fran Drescher nyahahahahahahahaha" :laugh:


                                Visit BoneSoft.com for code generation tools (XML & XSD -> C#, VB, etc...) and some free developer tools as well.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • B Bassam Saoud

                                  Are those people (who lost their job) in the IT industry? You can close the H1B program and burn it if you want but the real question is, with IT blooming (and recession-proof by the way, I need to find that article), do you have enough EXPERIENCED/HIGHLY EDECUATED people to do the job. But again who should be allowed to hire Foriegn professionals? My answer to this question is companies that have a full american staff and long history in the market. You think this is an american problem. well its not. If you go to freakin Lebanon, you will find that there are foriegn workers brought into the country. The simple fact is that all companies are investing in Technology and hence IT is in high demand.

                                  modified on Thursday, February 12, 2009 12:31 AM

                                  O Offline
                                  O Offline
                                  Oakman
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #73

                                  Bassam Saoud wrote:

                                  Are those people (who lost their job) in the IT industry

                                  Some, yes. Don't you read the news?

                                  Bassam Saoud wrote:

                                  But again who should be allowed to hire Foriegn professionals?

                                  Foreign companies doing business in foreign countries. See how simple that is?

                                  Bassam Saoud wrote:

                                  If you go to freakin Lebanon, you will find that there are foriegn workers brought into the country.

                                  And I should care about "freakin Lebanon," why? I sure hope any foreigners brought in get combat pay.

                                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B Bassam Saoud

                                    Oakman wrote:

                                    Yep. We didn't have any of that fancy healthcare either. Doctors were barbers and drugists sold snake oil to cure whatever ailed you.

                                    funny like always Oakman :laugh: :laugh:

                                    O Offline
                                    O Offline
                                    Oakman
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #74

                                    Bassam Saoud wrote:

                                    funny like always Oakman

                                    Thanks for the laughter, but I hope you understand that I was telling the absolute truth. In fact, it wasn't until about 1900 that hospitals started operating in the manner in which they do now, including adopting standards of antisepsis. Indeed, until 1920, the majority of surgery (by now conducted by M.D.'s) happened in the patient's home. X| What Stan doesn't seem to understand is that the chief cost associated with illness before the 1920's was not the cost of medical care, but rather the fact that sick people couldn't work and didn't get paid. A 1919 study conducted by the State of Illinois reported that lost wages due to sickness were four times larger than the medical expenditures associated with treating the illness. So "sickness insurance," (pretty much the same thing as disability insurance these days) was what people bought, not "health insurance."

                                    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S Stan Shannon

                                      Oakman wrote:

                                      Stan is terrified by the thought of actual freedom.

                                      Which would be what - anal sex? Abortions?

                                      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                      O Offline
                                      O Offline
                                      Oakman
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #75

                                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                                      Which would be what - anal sex? Abortions?

                                      That's hardly an exhausive list of what is none of the state's business, even though, once again, you fixate on anal sex. (Did you have a really traumatic shoreleave in San Francisco?) What I find most curious is that you seem to wish with all your heart for unrestrained capitalism with the no checks, bounds, or ameleration by the state - at the same time praying for a government that will insure you will never confront an idea or act that you personally disapprove of.

                                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C CSS_Shadow

                                        dan neely wrote:

                                        No more than in the standard Rep/Dem switcharoo we do almost every 4 to 8 years.

                                        And do you have any idea what the standard is?

                                        D Offline
                                        D Offline
                                        Dan Neely
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #76

                                        Are you old enough to remember Clinton - Bush 2? Or Bush1 - Clinton?

                                        Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

                                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • D Dan Neely

                                          Are you old enough to remember Clinton - Bush 2? Or Bush1 - Clinton?

                                          Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots. -- Robert Royall

                                          C Offline
                                          C Offline
                                          CSS_Shadow
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #77

                                          Yes.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups