Nice usage of foreach
-
You're sure it wasn't something like this?
foreach (User user in users)
{
yield return user;
}Marc
Available for consulting and full time employment. Contact me. Interacx
I think Luc may have been hinting at this - he'd better remember not to make such hints so subtle next time... "they probably will have introduced a new keyword yielding some attention to more recent customers..."
-
I think Luc may have been hinting at this - he'd better remember not to make such hints so subtle next time... "they probably will have introduced a new keyword yielding some attention to more recent customers..."
:thumbsup:
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google - the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get - use the code block button (PRE tags) to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
-
I think Luc may have been hinting at this - he'd better remember not to make such hints so subtle next time... "they probably will have introduced a new keyword yielding some attention to more recent customers..."
Party pooper.
-
Party pooper.
:thumbsup::thumbsup:
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google - the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get - use the code block button (PRE tags) to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
-
I once saw a programmer write this.
foreach (User user in users) { return user; }:laugh:I have seen this when the array doesn't contain a indexing property. return users[0]; // Doesn't work I seem to remember this being the default behaviour for non generic Lists in early .net (2?).
-
I have seen this when the array doesn't contain a indexing property. return users[0]; // Doesn't work I seem to remember this being the default behaviour for non generic Lists in early .net (2?).
I've seen that - and I've also done this "kludge" when I literally didn't have time to look it up: e.g. Must get done fast, bigger fish to fry.. this works - move on. Not ideal - but - depends what's going on.. schedule.. time constraints. It's still readable at least. --Jason
Know way to many languages... master of none!
-
You're sure it wasn't something like this?
foreach (User user in users)
{
yield return user;
}Marc
Available for consulting and full time employment. Contact me. Interacx
-
IEnumerable.FirstOrDefault[^] aside of course.
J4amieC wrote:
IEnumerable.FirstOrDefault[^] aside of course.
If, in fact, you are using .NET 3.5, as otherwise this doesn't exist.
-
If
usersprovides only theIEnumerableinterface then you kinda have to do that. We'd need to see more of the code to determine just how horrible it is.Ouch, you sure stepped in the salad! That code necessarily returns the first item in enumerating "users". Had it been a yield return things would be different though.
-
Ouch, you sure stepped in the salad! That code necessarily returns the first item in enumerating "users". Had it been a yield return things would be different though.
Ummm... yeah, so? :confused: