Can someone check this in VC++ 2008
-
https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=99331[^] Can someone check to see if the above bug was fixed in VC++ 2008. I've got some code that is based on the assumption that virtual properties works, i want to know if i have to modify the code or upgrade to 2008.
...cmk The idea that I can be presented with a problem, set out to logically solve it with the tools at hand, and wind up with a program that could not be legally used because someone else followed the same logical steps some years ago and filed for a patent on it is horrifying. - John Carmack
-
https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=99331[^] Can someone check to see if the above bug was fixed in VC++ 2008. I've got some code that is based on the assumption that virtual properties works, i want to know if i have to modify the code or upgrade to 2008.
...cmk The idea that I can be presented with a problem, set out to logically solve it with the tools at hand, and wind up with a program that could not be legally used because someone else followed the same logical steps some years ago and filed for a patent on it is horrifying. - John Carmack
You'll have to modify the code - that behaviour is still present in VS2008
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
-
You'll have to modify the code - that behaviour is still present in VS2008
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
Based on their bug response i'm not too surprised. Thanks for checking, i really didn't want to install VC 2008 Express just to check.
...cmk The idea that I can be presented with a problem, set out to logically solve it with the tools at hand, and wind up with a program that could not be legally used because someone else followed the same logical steps some years ago and filed for a patent on it is horrifying. - John Carmack