Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Washington Post: HOLMES: U.S. backtracks on missile shield

Washington Post: HOLMES: U.S. backtracks on missile shield

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comhelpannouncementlounge
114 Posts 11 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Chris Austin

    Richard A. Abbott wrote:

    If Britain wasn't fully committed to come when called, then Gulf War I and Gulf War II and post 9/11 into Afganistan would not have seen any kind of support from Britain. In fact, after 9/11, we came before you asked!

    I absolutely agree with you. It seemed, before our civilian leadership decided that Iraq needed to be liberated, NATO was ready to bring hell to anybody who wanted a piece of it.

    Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --?

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #71

    NATO is supposed to be a coalition of the willing for mutual defence. But, as shown by the willing for combat duties in Afghanistan, NATO may as well not exist. Only Canada, UK and USA seem to be holding up their membership card of NATO with any degree of honour.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Stan Shannon

      Oakman wrote:

      It's also because they are almost totally dependent on the US for defense against any serious threat.

      Absolutely. It should be interesting to see what happens after the US social welfare state eliminates that protection for them. I suspect the "Original Nations" or whatever they call their Indians up there, will just kick their asses and take over again.

      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

      O Offline
      O Offline
      Oakman
      wrote on last edited by
      #72

      Stan Shannon wrote:

      It should be interesting to see what happens after the US social welfare state eliminates that protection for them

      Oh don't be so harsh. After all they gave us Bill Shatner.

      Stan Shannon wrote:

      will just kick their asses and take over again

      My impression is that the Canadians, one on one, are just as tough as the Americans. I was simply pointing out that they knew they didn't have to spend any money on their defense so they didn't. Why should they? If we stop, they will start.

      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Oakman wrote:

        With all due respect for the UK, exactly how much defending of the US can we count on?

        If Britain wasn't fully committed to come when called, then Gulf War I and Gulf War II and post 9/11 into Afganistan would not have seen any kind of support from Britain. In fact, after 9/11, we came before you asked!

        Oakman wrote:

        status of civilized nation

        True, very true.

        O Offline
        O Offline
        Oakman
        wrote on last edited by
        #73

        Richard A. Abbott wrote:

        would not have seen any kind of support from Britain

        But I wasn't asking about support. I was asking about defense of the US homeland to match the defense of the UK that our bases provide. It's not a matter of whether your heart is in the right place, but whether you have enough men and material to help protect us, if we are attacked.

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          Mike Mullikin wrote:

          Why FFS?

          Because I dont imagine that our discussion will be worthwhile as you seem to have what I consider to be an overly simplistic view. Sorry if I appeared rude, it was not my intention. I find the attitude that many Americans have of yourselves being the World Police offensive.

          Mike Mullikin wrote:

          If the US keeps its nose out of other nation's affairs and requires its military only to defend its own borders (like nearly every other nation) then we need less military (soldiers & weaponry) than we have today. No?

          In an ideal world perhaps. In the real world some presence in other countries is required for your own defense. The example of Pine Gap that I gave earlier is an example of this.

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #74

          Josh Gray wrote:

          I find the attitude that many Americans have of yourselves being the World Police offensive.

          Errr... because you think we should not act like we're the world police? Neither do I. I want us to stop. Or because you think it's OK that we have military presence in 130+ countries?

          Josh Gray wrote:

          In the real world some presence in other countries is required for your own defense. The example of Pine Gap that I gave earlier is an example of this. Quote Selected Text

          I could more easily handle joint intelligence & command/control installations like Pine Gap if there weren't so many other bad examples.

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Chris Austin

            Didn't congress recently (sometime during the 'W' years) overturn a pentagon directed closure of a base in Puerto Rico? Wasn't the reasoning basically that they needed the income from the base to support a portion of the local economy? It's insanely frustrating.

            Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --?

            O Offline
            O Offline
            Oakman
            wrote on last edited by
            #75

            Chris Austin wrote:

            Wasn't the reasoning basically that they needed the income from the base to support a portion of the local economy

            I remember something of that - and every closure of every base even within this country is bitterly fought by the congressional delegation of the State that is losing a cash cow. My guess is that if the U.S. pulled all of its forces out of NATO (an organization than no longer has a purpose) a number of countries in the EU would be effected very negatively. Germany would be in danger of doing an Iceland.

            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Oakman wrote:

              kept black mailing you into sending a battalion over to make it look like we weren't alone

              Thats because you know our beer is better and that we'll bring a case or two for you guys. On a more serious note I think you'll find the Australia SAS' contribution in Iraq and Afghanistan was quite significant

              O Offline
              O Offline
              Oakman
              wrote on last edited by
              #76

              Josh Gray wrote:

              SAS

              Those guys are scary. Like Delta Force only with backup. I wonder how many of them have gone into private security work?

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • O Oakman

                Josh Gray wrote:

                SAS

                Those guys are scary. Like Delta Force only with backup. I wonder how many of them have gone into private security work?

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #77

                Oakman wrote:

                I wonder how many of them have gone into private security work?

                No idea. They are pretty clandestine even within Oz. I've read a few times that they were among the first troops into Iraq months before war was declared.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Stan Shannon

                  Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                  was more equal it would be more just and might just have universal beneficial effects.

                  Well, that is just fucking stupid, Richard. Its another shineing example of the utter, abysimally stupid principles of the left being forced upon us which I simply no longer have any tolerance for. You fools are destroying our civilization. Any thing that is guaranteed to be "equal" is guaranteed to be equally bad. It means no freedom of choice. It means no freedom period. I'm supposed to give up my freedom because other people cannot handle their own. Freedom, by definition, means inequality of results and outcomes. If you can't handle that, humble yourself to the mercy of my christian charity, or get the fuck out of America.

                  Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #78

                  Personally, I wouldn't want to go cap-in-hand to any charity. It is demeaning. I am better than that. My family would deserve better than that. And if it means government taking a small amount of money out of my salary each week/month for the benefit of all citizens then I am quite happy for that to happen. Everybody without exception benefits. And these benefits I talk about are not supplied by "means testing" and the begging bowl never needs to see the light of day. As you say, freedom is the right to choose. And in Britain, I choose benefit of health care for all. Stan, I believe we both will never agree on what kind of health care is best. Thus, we must therefore agree to disagree.

                  L S 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    Josh Gray wrote:

                    I find the attitude that many Americans have of yourselves being the World Police offensive.

                    Errr... because you think we should not act like we're the world police? Neither do I. I want us to stop. Or because you think it's OK that we have military presence in 130+ countries?

                    Josh Gray wrote:

                    In the real world some presence in other countries is required for your own defense. The example of Pine Gap that I gave earlier is an example of this. Quote Selected Text

                    I could more easily handle joint intelligence & command/control installations like Pine Gap if there weren't so many other bad examples.

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #79

                    Mike Mullikin wrote:

                    I find the attitude that many Americans have of yourselves being the World Police offensive. Errr... because you think we should not act like we're the world police? Neither do I. I want us to stop.

                    Because you dont act like police in any sense. You look out primarily for your own interests as you should and as other countries do. Dont try and dress it up as some kind of charity that the rest of us should be grateful for. To do so is offensive.

                    Mike Mullikin wrote:

                    I could more easily handle joint intelligence & command/control istallations like Pine Gap if there weren't so many other bad examples.

                    Which was my original point. Your comment that I responded to... "In fact, I'd take it even further and pull ALL U.S. military personnel, hardware and bases from all foreign countries - Japan, South Korea, Germany, UK, etc... All of it comes home and defends our ports and borders." ... is again overly simplistic, misleading and nationalistic because there are examples of US military presence overseas that is very important to your own security. Suggesting that they are here in OZ solely as a "farvour" to us, your poor cousins is again offensive. For me to suggest that you should be grateful to us for allowing them to be here would be similarly offensive because there is obviously a direct benefit to us as well. And your assumption that you paid for the hardware is also most likely wrong, probably unprovable and further evidence of your own poorly informed attitude.

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • O Oakman

                      Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                      would not have seen any kind of support from Britain

                      But I wasn't asking about support. I was asking about defense of the US homeland to match the defense of the UK that our bases provide. It's not a matter of whether your heart is in the right place, but whether you have enough men and material to help protect us, if we are attacked.

                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #80

                      Britain has nowhere near the size of armed forces that the United States enjoys, and you know that as well as I do. Consequently, we don't have the same quantity of equipment available at our disposal as is evident given my first sentence. But whatever men and materials there exists would no doubt be made available as part of your defence. And if I were 25-30 years younger, I'll be rubbing shoulders alongside you. Size isn't everything, but we would do whatever we could possibly do.

                      O 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        Mike Mullikin wrote:

                        I find the attitude that many Americans have of yourselves being the World Police offensive. Errr... because you think we should not act like we're the world police? Neither do I. I want us to stop.

                        Because you dont act like police in any sense. You look out primarily for your own interests as you should and as other countries do. Dont try and dress it up as some kind of charity that the rest of us should be grateful for. To do so is offensive.

                        Mike Mullikin wrote:

                        I could more easily handle joint intelligence & command/control istallations like Pine Gap if there weren't so many other bad examples.

                        Which was my original point. Your comment that I responded to... "In fact, I'd take it even further and pull ALL U.S. military personnel, hardware and bases from all foreign countries - Japan, South Korea, Germany, UK, etc... All of it comes home and defends our ports and borders." ... is again overly simplistic, misleading and nationalistic because there are examples of US military presence overseas that is very important to your own security. Suggesting that they are here in OZ solely as a "farvour" to us, your poor cousins is again offensive. For me to suggest that you should be grateful to us for allowing them to be here would be similarly offensive because there is obviously a direct benefit to us as well. And your assumption that you paid for the hardware is also most likely wrong, probably unprovable and further evidence of your own poorly informed attitude.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #81

                        Josh Gray wrote:

                        Because you dont act like police in any sense. You look out primarily for your own interests as you should and as other countries do.

                        I disagree.

                        Josh Gray wrote:

                        Dont try and dress it up as some kind of charity that the rest of us should be grateful for.

                        I try not to, but my taxes are entirely too high already and the current bail-outs are gonna eventually make them sky-rocket. Excuse me for asking that we cut back in places.

                        Josh Gray wrote:

                        Suggesting that they are here in OZ solely as a "farvour" to us, your poor cousins is again offensive.

                        Where did I do that?

                        Josh Gray wrote:

                        And your assumption that you paid for the hardware is also most likely wrong, probably unprovable and further evidence of your own poorly informed attitude.

                        Except I didn't assume, state or imply that. Who is poorly informed?

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Personally, I wouldn't want to go cap-in-hand to any charity. It is demeaning. I am better than that. My family would deserve better than that. And if it means government taking a small amount of money out of my salary each week/month for the benefit of all citizens then I am quite happy for that to happen. Everybody without exception benefits. And these benefits I talk about are not supplied by "means testing" and the begging bowl never needs to see the light of day. As you say, freedom is the right to choose. And in Britain, I choose benefit of health care for all. Stan, I believe we both will never agree on what kind of health care is best. Thus, we must therefore agree to disagree.

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #82

                          Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                          And in Britain, I choose benefit of health care for all.

                          Do others in Britain get to choose not to contribute to national health care?

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            Britain has nowhere near the size of armed forces that the United States enjoys, and you know that as well as I do. Consequently, we don't have the same quantity of equipment available at our disposal as is evident given my first sentence. But whatever men and materials there exists would no doubt be made available as part of your defence. And if I were 25-30 years younger, I'll be rubbing shoulders alongside you. Size isn't everything, but we would do whatever we could possibly do.

                            O Offline
                            O Offline
                            Oakman
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #83

                            Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                            we would do whatever we could possibly do.

                            I never questioned that, and if something I wrote implied otherwise, I apologise. I have great respect for the UK - and for all of the other countries from whom we are separated by a common language. We are a bit like a family. We can get really pissed at each other, but it's really not a good idea to go after one of us unless you are ready to take on all of us.

                            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                            L 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • I Ilion

                              Christian Graus wrote:

                              ... I don't expect you to care what I think, ...

                              "What is different about this night from all other nights?"

                              _ Offline
                              _ Offline
                              _Damian S_
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #84

                              ah, back to normal I see... ;P

                              Knowledge is knowing that the tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is not putting it in fruit salad!! Booger Mobile - Camp Quality esCarpade 2010

                              I 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • O Oakman

                                Stan Shannon wrote:

                                It should be interesting to see what happens after the US social welfare state eliminates that protection for them

                                Oh don't be so harsh. After all they gave us Bill Shatner.

                                Stan Shannon wrote:

                                will just kick their asses and take over again

                                My impression is that the Canadians, one on one, are just as tough as the Americans. I was simply pointing out that they knew they didn't have to spend any money on their defense so they didn't. Why should they? If we stop, they will start.

                                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Stan Shannon
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #85

                                Oakman wrote:

                                My impression is that the Canadians, one on one, are just as tough as the Americans.

                                Quite a lot tougher, I would suspect, considering the climate they have to put up with.

                                Oakman wrote:

                                Why should they? If we stop, they will start.

                                With what? There is no way they are going to dismantle the welfare state. It will continue to grow, consuming their economy and finally their society.

                                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                O 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  Josh Gray wrote:

                                  Because you dont act like police in any sense. You look out primarily for your own interests as you should and as other countries do.

                                  I disagree.

                                  Josh Gray wrote:

                                  Dont try and dress it up as some kind of charity that the rest of us should be grateful for.

                                  I try not to, but my taxes are entirely too high already and the current bail-outs are gonna eventually make them sky-rocket. Excuse me for asking that we cut back in places.

                                  Josh Gray wrote:

                                  Suggesting that they are here in OZ solely as a "farvour" to us, your poor cousins is again offensive.

                                  Where did I do that?

                                  Josh Gray wrote:

                                  And your assumption that you paid for the hardware is also most likely wrong, probably unprovable and further evidence of your own poorly informed attitude.

                                  Except I didn't assume, state or imply that. Who is poorly informed?

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #86

                                  As I said I dont imagine that our discussion will be worthwhile.

                                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    Personally, I wouldn't want to go cap-in-hand to any charity. It is demeaning. I am better than that. My family would deserve better than that. And if it means government taking a small amount of money out of my salary each week/month for the benefit of all citizens then I am quite happy for that to happen. Everybody without exception benefits. And these benefits I talk about are not supplied by "means testing" and the begging bowl never needs to see the light of day. As you say, freedom is the right to choose. And in Britain, I choose benefit of health care for all. Stan, I believe we both will never agree on what kind of health care is best. Thus, we must therefore agree to disagree.

                                    S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Stan Shannon
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #87

                                    Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                                    It is demeaning.

                                    So, you are too good to ask me for my money, but empowering the state to reach into my pocket and take my money away from me in order to give to you is a source of pride for you? Are you even capable of thinking about how ridiculous and dangerous that is?

                                    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      As I said I dont imagine that our discussion will be worthwhile.

                                      L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      Lost User
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #88

                                      Nice response. Accuse me of all sorts of things... then when I ask "where/what/when" - you bail out.

                                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Lost User

                                        Nice response. Accuse me of all sorts of things... then when I ask "where/what/when" - you bail out.

                                        L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        Lost User
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #89

                                        Mike Mullikin wrote:

                                        Nice response. Accuse me of all sorts of things... then when I ask "where/what/when" - you bail out.

                                        Sorry I'd assumed you could reread your own posts for yourself.

                                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • L Lost User

                                          Mike Mullikin wrote:

                                          Nice response. Accuse me of all sorts of things... then when I ask "where/what/when" - you bail out.

                                          Sorry I'd assumed you could reread your own posts for yourself.

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          Lost User
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #90

                                          Josh Gray wrote:

                                          Sorry I'd assumed you could reread your own posts for yourself.

                                          I read them the first time. I never stated or implied that US presence in Australia was a "favour" to you. I never stated or implied that the US paid for all the hardware at Pine Gap.

                                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups