Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Damn! Where the hell is oily now?

Damn! Where the hell is oily now?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcomsecuritytutorialquestion
16 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Stan Shannon
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    The Obama Justice Department has adopted a legal stance identical to, if not more aggressive than, the Bush version. It argues that the court-forced disclosure of the surveillance programs would cause "exceptional harm to national security" by exposing intelligence sources and methods. [^] This is not a big surprise, and is certainly what I expected. Any president should, and will, put national defense before a puritanical interpretation of court decisions. I would actually applaud Obama for this if it were not such a glaring example of the very hypocrisy that put him into office in the first place.

    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

    O L S 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • S Stan Shannon

      The Obama Justice Department has adopted a legal stance identical to, if not more aggressive than, the Bush version. It argues that the court-forced disclosure of the surveillance programs would cause "exceptional harm to national security" by exposing intelligence sources and methods. [^] This is not a big surprise, and is certainly what I expected. Any president should, and will, put national defense before a puritanical interpretation of court decisions. I would actually applaud Obama for this if it were not such a glaring example of the very hypocrisy that put him into office in the first place.

      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

      O Offline
      O Offline
      Oakman
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      See? The minute Chris renames the place, you're off your good behavior and spoiling for a fight. But we can't blame you, you're a victim.

      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

      Y S 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • S Stan Shannon

        The Obama Justice Department has adopted a legal stance identical to, if not more aggressive than, the Bush version. It argues that the court-forced disclosure of the surveillance programs would cause "exceptional harm to national security" by exposing intelligence sources and methods. [^] This is not a big surprise, and is certainly what I expected. Any president should, and will, put national defense before a puritanical interpretation of court decisions. I would actually applaud Obama for this if it were not such a glaring example of the very hypocrisy that put him into office in the first place.

        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        He probably can't find the place. The illuminated arrowed sign's lightbulb has gone out and nobody can find a replacement.

        O 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          He probably can't find the place. The illuminated arrowed sign's lightbulb has gone out and nobody can find a replacement.

          O Offline
          O Offline
          Oakman
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Richard A. Abbott wrote:

          The illuminated arrowed sign's lightbulb has gone out and nobody can find a replacement.

          Your really shouldn't have put up the one that said "Abbot's Dick."

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • O Oakman

            See? The minute Chris renames the place, you're off your good behavior and spoiling for a fight. But we can't blame you, you're a victim.

            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

            Y Offline
            Y Offline
            Yusuf
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            The other day, my kids were turning the living room upside down. My wife told then (angrily) go to the basement and do whatever you want. ;P

            Yusuf

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O Oakman

              See? The minute Chris renames the place, you're off your good behavior and spoiling for a fight. But we can't blame you, you're a victim.

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stan Shannon
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Well, what would good behavior be on this one? a) Obama is as evil as Bush? b) Obama is a great guy for spying on Americans? I just need the oily one to explain it all...

              Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

              O O 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • O Oakman

                Richard A. Abbott wrote:

                The illuminated arrowed sign's lightbulb has gone out and nobody can find a replacement.

                Your really shouldn't have put up the one that said "Abbot's Dick."

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Fame at last ;P

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Stan Shannon

                  Well, what would good behavior be on this one? a) Obama is as evil as Bush? b) Obama is a great guy for spying on Americans? I just need the oily one to explain it all...

                  Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                  O Offline
                  O Offline
                  Oakman
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  I just need the oily one to explain it all...

                  Wait until Obama reinstates the draft. Oily and you may become fast friends at that point.

                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Stan Shannon

                    Well, what would good behavior be on this one? a) Obama is as evil as Bush? b) Obama is a great guy for spying on Americans? I just need the oily one to explain it all...

                    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                    O Offline
                    O Offline
                    oilFactotum
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    It's quite simple, really. So simple, in fact, that it can be explained soley with single syllable words - It was wrong then, it is wrong now.

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Stan Shannon

                      The Obama Justice Department has adopted a legal stance identical to, if not more aggressive than, the Bush version. It argues that the court-forced disclosure of the surveillance programs would cause "exceptional harm to national security" by exposing intelligence sources and methods. [^] This is not a big surprise, and is certainly what I expected. Any president should, and will, put national defense before a puritanical interpretation of court decisions. I would actually applaud Obama for this if it were not such a glaring example of the very hypocrisy that put him into office in the first place.

                      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Well, duh! How can he maintain a socialist state without his secret police?

                      Bob Emmett

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Stan Shannon

                        The Obama Justice Department has adopted a legal stance identical to, if not more aggressive than, the Bush version. It argues that the court-forced disclosure of the surveillance programs would cause "exceptional harm to national security" by exposing intelligence sources and methods. [^] This is not a big surprise, and is certainly what I expected. Any president should, and will, put national defense before a puritanical interpretation of court decisions. I would actually applaud Obama for this if it were not such a glaring example of the very hypocrisy that put him into office in the first place.

                        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Sahir Shah
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        there are some things no president can do different. so don't expect any changes on that front. many of his liberal supporters feared that obama would shed his red coat and reveal himself as a centrist. that hasn't happened yet, so you don't have sufficientt grounds for gloating.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • O oilFactotum

                          It's quite simple, really. So simple, in fact, that it can be explained soley with single syllable words - It was wrong then, it is wrong now.

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          Stan Shannon
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          oilFactotum wrote:

                          It was wrong then, it is wrong now.

                          OK. So lets hear some real anti-Obama vitriole. I am eagerly anticipating your outrage. And I expect a lot more than single syllable words. Lets have some ol' fashioned, really nasty, Bush-hating kind of fulmination here. Don't hold back...

                          Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                          O S 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • S Stan Shannon

                            oilFactotum wrote:

                            It was wrong then, it is wrong now.

                            OK. So lets hear some real anti-Obama vitriole. I am eagerly anticipating your outrage. And I expect a lot more than single syllable words. Lets have some ol' fashioned, really nasty, Bush-hating kind of fulmination here. Don't hold back...

                            Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                            O Offline
                            O Offline
                            oilFactotum
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Stan Shannon wrote:

                            Lets have some ol' fashioned, really nasty, Bush-hating kind of fulmination here

                            Why? I never did that with Bush, so why should I do it with Obama?

                            S 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Stan Shannon

                              oilFactotum wrote:

                              It was wrong then, it is wrong now.

                              OK. So lets hear some real anti-Obama vitriole. I am eagerly anticipating your outrage. And I expect a lot more than single syllable words. Lets have some ol' fashioned, really nasty, Bush-hating kind of fulmination here. Don't hold back...

                              Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              Sahir Shah
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Stan Shannon wrote:

                              So lets hear some real anti-Obama vitriole.

                              where are the collective farms and where are the gulags? Oh lider el maximo del los americanos, you are a dismal failure as a marxist :laugh:

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • O oilFactotum

                                Stan Shannon wrote:

                                Lets have some ol' fashioned, really nasty, Bush-hating kind of fulmination here

                                Why? I never did that with Bush, so why should I do it with Obama?

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Stan Shannon
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                oilFactotum wrote:

                                Why? I never did that with Bush, so why should I do it with Obama?

                                Come on, oily, not even one little "betrayal of his oath to defend the constitution" lecture? I knew it wouldn't be difficult to establish that all of that was just propaganda to help get a leftist into the oval office, but I really didn't think you would make it that easy.

                                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                O 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Stan Shannon

                                  oilFactotum wrote:

                                  Why? I never did that with Bush, so why should I do it with Obama?

                                  Come on, oily, not even one little "betrayal of his oath to defend the constitution" lecture? I knew it wouldn't be difficult to establish that all of that was just propaganda to help get a leftist into the oval office, but I really didn't think you would make it that easy.

                                  Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                  O Offline
                                  O Offline
                                  oilFactotum
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Yawn. I don't lecture. I gave Bush 6 years, I'm gonna wait a little more than 6 weeks for Obama. You may remember, the problem with Bush that I carried on about was torture and that makes him - and a lot of his administration - war criminals.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups