Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Obama does something right.

Obama does something right.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comannouncement
61 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • O Oakman

    Stan Shannon wrote:

    It should'nt require being a member of a Neanderthal branch of Christianity to appreciate that the mass production of human fetuses in order to harvest stem cells just ain't right.

    :sigh: The fetuses are being produced anyway, Stan. As I said in my OP, they are about to be thrown away and nothing Bush did made any difference regarding that. If you have a problem with fertility treatments and such, by all means post about it. Or, I suppose, you could offer to pay for the cryogenic storage of all of those fertilized eggs yourself. After all, if there's an all out nuclear war, they might come in handy.

    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Stan Shannon
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    Is there any provision in the executive order concerning what happens to all those extra fetuses that are "accidentally" produced? If they create a few hundred extra "accidentally" so much the better? Does being concerned about that make me a christian troglodyte of some kind? You also realize, I'm sure, that the ban on using federal funds to pay for it was also lifted? So we are all being forced by the state to pay for the process whether we morally approve of it or not... Yeah, thats progress... :sigh:

    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

    L T 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • S Stan Shannon

      Is there any provision in the executive order concerning what happens to all those extra fetuses that are "accidentally" produced? If they create a few hundred extra "accidentally" so much the better? Does being concerned about that make me a christian troglodyte of some kind? You also realize, I'm sure, that the ban on using federal funds to pay for it was also lifted? So we are all being forced by the state to pay for the process whether we morally approve of it or not... Yeah, thats progress... :sigh:

      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Le centriste
      wrote on last edited by
      #13

      Stan Shannon wrote:

      So we are all being forced by the state to pay for the process whether we morally approve of it or not...

      Were you concerned by the government using money of those who did not approve it to wage war?

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Le centriste

        Stan Shannon wrote:

        So we are all being forced by the state to pay for the process whether we morally approve of it or not...

        Were you concerned by the government using money of those who did not approve it to wage war?

        S Offline
        S Offline
        Stan Shannon
        wrote on last edited by
        #14

        Le Centriste wrote:

        Were you concerned by the government using money of those who did not approve it to wage war?

        Considering that it was done in a constitutionally sanctioned fashion - no. The constitution gives the government the authority to wage war - not to mass produce human fetuses.

        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

        O S 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • D Dalek Dave

          I believe that coffee should be banned. It is addictive, can be used to hide drugs and is a dangerous stimulent that kids can get hold of and then become annoying bastards. Mainly it should be banned because I hate the taste and smell of the stuff! Now, Tea, that is a much better drink!

          ------------------------------------ "Will you marry me? Are you rich?, Don't answer in that order" Groucho Marx

          F Offline
          F Offline
          fred_
          wrote on last edited by
          #15

          Dalek Dave wrote:

          I believe that coffee should be banned.

          Wash your mouth out with soap young man .. coffee IS my friend

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Stan Shannon

            Le Centriste wrote:

            Were you concerned by the government using money of those who did not approve it to wage war?

            Considering that it was done in a constitutionally sanctioned fashion - no. The constitution gives the government the authority to wage war - not to mass produce human fetuses.

            Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

            O Offline
            O Offline
            Oakman
            wrote on last edited by
            #16

            Stan Shannon wrote:

            The constitution gives the government the authority to wage war to agree with me at all times and in all ways and to enforce my personal prejudices without delay or mercy.

            Fixed that for you. ;)

            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O Oakman

              This morning he will sign an executive order recinding the idiotic hair-splitting strictures on embryonic cell-stem research that George Bush put in place as a bone thrown to Neanderthal branch of Christianity. This deliberately head-in-the-sand approach to research that might save thousands of productive lives by "protecting" quickened human eggs that were about to be thrown away has hampered scientists and been sighted as proof that we were returning to the age of the "know-nothings." In spite of the fact that Congress voted to overturn Bush's cut off of funds for any organization that violated his personal moral code, Bush insisted that he was right and the people of the United States and their elected representatives -- and even Nancy Reagan -- were wrong, and vetoed the bill. News story[^]

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

              T Offline
              T Offline
              Tim Craig
              wrote on last edited by
              #17

              :thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:

              "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

              I'm a proud denizen of the Real Soapbox[^]
              ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!!!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Stan Shannon

                Is there any provision in the executive order concerning what happens to all those extra fetuses that are "accidentally" produced? If they create a few hundred extra "accidentally" so much the better? Does being concerned about that make me a christian troglodyte of some kind? You also realize, I'm sure, that the ban on using federal funds to pay for it was also lifted? So we are all being forced by the state to pay for the process whether we morally approve of it or not... Yeah, thats progress... :sigh:

                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                T Offline
                T Offline
                Tim Craig
                wrote on last edited by
                #18

                Stan Shannon wrote:

                Does being concerned about that make me a christian troglodyte of some kind?

                No, you're a christian troglodyte first, foremost, and always. :laugh:

                "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

                I'm a proud denizen of the Real Soapbox[^]
                ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!!!

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T Tim Craig

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  Does being concerned about that make me a christian troglodyte of some kind?

                  No, you're a christian troglodyte first, foremost, and always. :laugh:

                  "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

                  I'm a proud denizen of the Real Soapbox[^]
                  ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!!!

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Stan Shannon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  Tim Craig wrote:

                  No, you're a christian troglodyte first, foremost, and always.

                  Well, its better than being what you are, pal. Say, how many embryos do you think it will take to keep your fat ass alive?

                  Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                  O T 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • S Stan Shannon

                    Tim Craig wrote:

                    No, you're a christian troglodyte first, foremost, and always.

                    Well, its better than being what you are, pal. Say, how many embryos do you think it will take to keep your fat ass alive?

                    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                    O Offline
                    O Offline
                    Oakman
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #20

                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                    Well, its better than being what you are, pal. Say, how many embryos do you think it will take to keep your fat ass alive?

                    Stan, Christianity is a religion with very specific entrance requirements. Except for the fuzzy-wuzzy cults who think that Yeshua was some sort of new-age hippie who gave everybody a rose when was put on trial, the Apostle's Creed has been recognized as defining the necessary faith need to self-identify as a Christian. I believe in God, the Father Almighty, the Maker of heaven and earth, and in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord: Who was conceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, dead, and buried; He descended into hell. The third day He arose again from the dead; He ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty; from thence He shall come to judge the quick and the dead. I believe in the Holy Ghost; the holy catholic church; the communion of saints; the forgiveness of sins; the resurrection of the body; and the life everlasting.

                    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                    T S 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • O Oakman

                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                      Well, its better than being what you are, pal. Say, how many embryos do you think it will take to keep your fat ass alive?

                      Stan, Christianity is a religion with very specific entrance requirements. Except for the fuzzy-wuzzy cults who think that Yeshua was some sort of new-age hippie who gave everybody a rose when was put on trial, the Apostle's Creed has been recognized as defining the necessary faith need to self-identify as a Christian. I believe in God, the Father Almighty, the Maker of heaven and earth, and in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord: Who was conceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, dead, and buried; He descended into hell. The third day He arose again from the dead; He ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty; from thence He shall come to judge the quick and the dead. I believe in the Holy Ghost; the holy catholic church; the communion of saints; the forgiveness of sins; the resurrection of the body; and the life everlasting.

                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Algoraphobia: An exaggerated fear of the outside world rooted in the belief that one might spontaneously combust due to global warming.

                      T Offline
                      T Offline
                      Tim Craig
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #21

                      Oakman wrote:

                      Stan, Christianity is a religion with very specific entrance requirements.

                      For Stan, christianity is just a political requirement. You don't actually have to "believe" anything about it but go through the motions to please the power base. He's still the atheist he claims to have grown up as. He's just afraid to admit it to his buddies anymore.

                      "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

                      I'm a proud denizen of the Real Soapbox[^]
                      ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!!!

                      O 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Stan Shannon

                        Tim Craig wrote:

                        No, you're a christian troglodyte first, foremost, and always.

                        Well, its better than being what you are, pal. Say, how many embryos do you think it will take to keep your fat ass alive?

                        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                        T Offline
                        T Offline
                        Tim Craig
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #22

                        I hope lots of them. Wait until you need some gene therapy and we'll see how long you refuse it.

                        "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

                        I'm a proud denizen of the Real Soapbox[^]
                        ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!!!

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • I Ilion

                          ... and naturally, it's "the culture of dealth."

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          soap brain
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #23

                          Are you morally opposed to the use of the HeLa cell line in biomedical research?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Stan Shannon

                            Le Centriste wrote:

                            Were you concerned by the government using money of those who did not approve it to wage war?

                            Considering that it was done in a constitutionally sanctioned fashion - no. The constitution gives the government the authority to wage war - not to mass produce human fetuses.

                            Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                            S Offline
                            S Offline
                            soap brain
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #24

                            Stan Shannon wrote:

                            Considering that it was done in a constitutionally sanctioned fashion - no.

                            Hypocrite.

                            Stan Shannon wrote:

                            The constitution gives the government the authority to wage war - not to mass produce human fetuses.

                            'The Government' doesn't mass produce human foetuses. Your beloved 'People' do, the means by which I'll explain to you when you're older; they're also not going to stop anytime soon, so why should we not make it to the benefit rather than detriment of mankind?

                            S 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • T Tim Craig

                              I hope lots of them. Wait until you need some gene therapy and we'll see how long you refuse it.

                              "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

                              I'm a proud denizen of the Real Soapbox[^]
                              ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!!!

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              Stan Shannon
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #25

                              Tim Craig wrote:

                              I hope lots of them.

                              And if they tasted good dipped in butter, you'd probably require even more of them.

                              Tim Craig wrote:

                              Wait until you need some gene therapy and we'll see how long you refuse it.

                              I would refuse any medical technology acquired from the use of human fetuses or any other form of experimentation on human beings.

                              Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S soap brain

                                Stan Shannon wrote:

                                Considering that it was done in a constitutionally sanctioned fashion - no.

                                Hypocrite.

                                Stan Shannon wrote:

                                The constitution gives the government the authority to wage war - not to mass produce human fetuses.

                                'The Government' doesn't mass produce human foetuses. Your beloved 'People' do, the means by which I'll explain to you when you're older; they're also not going to stop anytime soon, so why should we not make it to the benefit rather than detriment of mankind?

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Stan Shannon
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #26

                                Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                Hypocrite

                                Nothing hypocritical about it. I don't happen to believe that people who are morally opposed to war should be requred to fund it. But making war is a perfectly valid form of government activity and is sanctioned by the constitution. Embryonic research isn't.

                                Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                'The Government' doesn't mass produce human foetuses. Your beloved 'People' do, the means by which I'll explain to you when you're older; they're also not going to stop anytime soon, so why should we not make it to the benefit rather than detriment of mankind?

                                Embryos certainly can be massed produced, and will be now that the government has lifted the ban on tax payer money being used for that purpose.

                                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                S L 7 3 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • S Stan Shannon

                                  Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                  Hypocrite

                                  Nothing hypocritical about it. I don't happen to believe that people who are morally opposed to war should be requred to fund it. But making war is a perfectly valid form of government activity and is sanctioned by the constitution. Embryonic research isn't.

                                  Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                  'The Government' doesn't mass produce human foetuses. Your beloved 'People' do, the means by which I'll explain to you when you're older; they're also not going to stop anytime soon, so why should we not make it to the benefit rather than detriment of mankind?

                                  Embryos certainly can be massed produced, and will be now that the government has lifted the ban on tax payer money being used for that purpose.

                                  Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                  S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  soap brain
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #27

                                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                                  Nothing hypocritical about it. I don't happen to believe that people who are morally opposed to war should be requred to fund it. But making war is a perfectly valid form of government activity and is sanctioned by the constitution. Embryonic research isn't.

                                  Yes, perhaps they saw into the future and decided that embryonic research was wrong. They also apparently decided that pocket calculators are an unconstitutional mode of mathematical computation within government schools.

                                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                                  Embryos certainly can be massed produced, and will be now that the government has lifted the ban on tax payer money being used for that purpose.

                                  Good. Maybe they'll use those little bags of salty water to cure spinal muscular atrophy or nephroblastoma.

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Stan Shannon

                                    Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                    Hypocrite

                                    Nothing hypocritical about it. I don't happen to believe that people who are morally opposed to war should be requred to fund it. But making war is a perfectly valid form of government activity and is sanctioned by the constitution. Embryonic research isn't.

                                    Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                    'The Government' doesn't mass produce human foetuses. Your beloved 'People' do, the means by which I'll explain to you when you're older; they're also not going to stop anytime soon, so why should we not make it to the benefit rather than detriment of mankind?

                                    Embryos certainly can be massed produced, and will be now that the government has lifted the ban on tax payer money being used for that purpose.

                                    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    Lost User
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #28

                                    As the result of the Bush ban, many scientists left the US for foreign countries such as UK to do this research. Would it not be beneficial to the United States to attempt to become world renowned leaders in this subject. By ignoring or condemning this subject will not make it go away.

                                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      As the result of the Bush ban, many scientists left the US for foreign countries such as UK to do this research. Would it not be beneficial to the United States to attempt to become world renowned leaders in this subject. By ignoring or condemning this subject will not make it go away.

                                      S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Stan Shannon
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #29

                                      There was no "Bush Ban". He merely disallowed federal taxes being used to create new embryonic stem cell lines. Otherwise, the research was unaffected. Which is why today there are any number of far more promising stem cell sources than embryos. The notion that there should be some concern about the moral limits of science is an entirely prudent concern. It is a good thing, not a bad thing.

                                      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S soap brain

                                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                                        Nothing hypocritical about it. I don't happen to believe that people who are morally opposed to war should be requred to fund it. But making war is a perfectly valid form of government activity and is sanctioned by the constitution. Embryonic research isn't.

                                        Yes, perhaps they saw into the future and decided that embryonic research was wrong. They also apparently decided that pocket calculators are an unconstitutional mode of mathematical computation within government schools.

                                        Stan Shannon wrote:

                                        Embryos certainly can be massed produced, and will be now that the government has lifted the ban on tax payer money being used for that purpose.

                                        Good. Maybe they'll use those little bags of salty water to cure spinal muscular atrophy or nephroblastoma.

                                        S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        Stan Shannon
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #30

                                        Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                        Yes, perhaps they saw into the future and decided that embryonic research was wrong. They also apparently decided that pocket calculators are an unconstitutional mode of mathematical computation within government schools.

                                        In the US the constitution does not provide for 'government schools'

                                        Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                        . Maybe they'll use those little bags of salty water

                                        They are human embryos.

                                        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Stan Shannon

                                          Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                          Yes, perhaps they saw into the future and decided that embryonic research was wrong. They also apparently decided that pocket calculators are an unconstitutional mode of mathematical computation within government schools.

                                          In the US the constitution does not provide for 'government schools'

                                          Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                          . Maybe they'll use those little bags of salty water

                                          They are human embryos.

                                          Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                                          S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          soap brain
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #31

                                          Stan Shannon wrote:

                                          In the US the constitution does not provide for 'government schools'

                                          OK then, burn them all!

                                          Stan Shannon wrote:

                                          They are human embryos.

                                          Fine, clumps of bags of salty water.

                                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups