Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. More "you are not your brain"

More "you are not your brain"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comdesign
37 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I Ilion

    Denyse O'Leary on Uncommon Descent: Phineas Gage: Evolution of a lecture room psychopath[^]

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    I prefer Dennis Leary[^]. Kind of appropriate :)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • I Ilion

      Denyse O'Leary on Uncommon Descent: Phineas Gage: Evolution of a lecture room psychopath[^]

      T Offline
      T Offline
      Tim Craig
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      And you don't have a brain so what's your point?

      "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

      I'm a proud denizen of the Real Soapbox[^]
      ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!!!

      I 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T Tim Craig

        And you don't have a brain so what's your point?

        "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

        I'm a proud denizen of the Real Soapbox[^]
        ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!!!

        I Offline
        I Offline
        Ilion
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Tim Craig wrote:

        And you don't have a brain so what's your point?

        And you appear to not have a mind. But since the point is your head, I suppose it's OK that you are determined to be mindless.

        F 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Ilion

          Denyse O'Leary on Uncommon Descent: Phineas Gage: Evolution of a lecture room psychopath[^]

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Shrill anti-science moron feebly attempts to undermine modern neuroscience by citing an opinion piece claiming the historical conclusions of a hundred year old case report might be controversial.

          - F

          I 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            Shrill anti-science moron feebly attempts to undermine modern neuroscience by citing an opinion piece claiming the historical conclusions of a hundred year old case report might be controversial.

            - F

            I Offline
            I Offline
            Ilion
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            Fisticuffs wrote:

            Shrill anti-science moron feebly attempts to undermine modern neuroscience by citing an opinion piece claiming the historical conclusions of a hundred year old case report might be controversial.

            And you're an anti-rational fool who chooses not to reason logically. Also, this "science" thingie you worship isn't even about truth in the first place.

            T L 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • I Ilion

              Denyse O'Leary on Uncommon Descent: Phineas Gage: Evolution of a lecture room psychopath[^]

              S Offline
              S Offline
              soap brain
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Personality and behavioural change after severe blunt head injury--a relative's view.[^] A model of personality change after traumatic brain injury and the development of the Brain Injury Personality Scales[^] The Phenomenology of Personality Change Due to Traumatic Brain Injury in Children and Adolescents [^] Social cognitive factors in brain injury-associated personality change.[^] Personality change after severe head injury.[^] Personality change following head injury: assessment with the NEO Five-Factor Inventory.[^] Mood change following left hemispheric brain injury[^]

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • I Ilion

                Fisticuffs wrote:

                Shrill anti-science moron feebly attempts to undermine modern neuroscience by citing an opinion piece claiming the historical conclusions of a hundred year old case report might be controversial.

                And you're an anti-rational fool who chooses not to reason logically. Also, this "science" thingie you worship isn't even about truth in the first place.

                T Offline
                T Offline
                Tim Craig
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                Ilíon wrote:

                And you're an anti-rational fool who chooses not to reason logically

                You couldn't find reason and logic if they were stuck to your ass. In fact, you couldn't even empty a boot full of piss if the instructions were taped to bottom.

                "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

                I'm a proud denizen of the Real Soapbox[^]
                ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!!!

                F 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • I Ilion

                  Fisticuffs wrote:

                  Shrill anti-science moron feebly attempts to undermine modern neuroscience by citing an opinion piece claiming the historical conclusions of a hundred year old case report might be controversial.

                  And you're an anti-rational fool who chooses not to reason logically. Also, this "science" thingie you worship isn't even about truth in the first place.

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  Ilíon wrote:

                  this "science" thingie you worship

                  Unlike you, we do not worship the anthropomorphism of an abstract concept.

                  Ilíon wrote:

                  isn't even about truth in the first place

                  Well, you've grasped that much, well done. (But try not to sound so petulant.)

                  Bob Emmett

                  I 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    Ilíon wrote:

                    this "science" thingie you worship

                    Unlike you, we do not worship the anthropomorphism of an abstract concept.

                    Ilíon wrote:

                    isn't even about truth in the first place

                    Well, you've grasped that much, well done. (But try not to sound so petulant.)

                    Bob Emmett

                    I Offline
                    I Offline
                    Ilion
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Bob Emmett wrote:

                    Well, you've grasped that much, well done.

                    When are you going to grasp it?

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • I Ilion

                      Denyse O'Leary on Uncommon Descent: Phineas Gage: Evolution of a lecture room psychopath[^]

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      soap brain
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      By the way, I would strongly advise you to not ignore the papers I linked to.

                      O 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S soap brain

                        By the way, I would strongly advise you to not ignore the papers I linked to.

                        O Offline
                        O Offline
                        Oakman
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        so much for "try," eh, grasshopper?

                        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • O Oakman

                          so much for "try," eh, grasshopper?

                          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          soap brain
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          There are other people that would be interested in them.

                          O 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S soap brain

                            There are other people that would be interested in them.

                            O Offline
                            O Offline
                            Oakman
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            do or not do, there is no try - and no explanation.

                            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                            S 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • O Oakman

                              do or not do, there is no try - and no explanation.

                              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              soap brain
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              Of course there is a 'try'. What kind of argument is that? In fact, trying invariably leads to doing or not doing. And there is always an explanation. It just depends on whether you want to hear it, and whether I want to tell you. Which I don't.

                              O 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S soap brain

                                Of course there is a 'try'. What kind of argument is that? In fact, trying invariably leads to doing or not doing. And there is always an explanation. It just depends on whether you want to hear it, and whether I want to tell you. Which I don't.

                                O Offline
                                O Offline
                                Oakman
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                What kind of argument is that?

                                Take it up with Yoda.

                                Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                And there is always an explanation

                                No, I am afraid that you'll find out when you grow up, that there isn't - and even when there is, no-one wants to hear it.

                                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                S 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • O Oakman

                                  Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                  What kind of argument is that?

                                  Take it up with Yoda.

                                  Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                  And there is always an explanation

                                  No, I am afraid that you'll find out when you grow up, that there isn't - and even when there is, no-one wants to hear it.

                                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                                  S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  soap brain
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  Oakman wrote:

                                  Take it up with Yoda.

                                  Maybe I will.

                                  Oakman wrote:

                                  No, I am afraid that you'll find out when you grow up, that there isn't - and even when there is, no-one wants to hear it.

                                  There is always a reason that things happen, it's just that sometimes you have yet to find out what it is. And it depends what it is, as to whether no-one wants to hear it. I'm still trying to figure it out, but I know that I have to never tell anybody anything about me.

                                  R 7 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S soap brain

                                    Oakman wrote:

                                    Take it up with Yoda.

                                    Maybe I will.

                                    Oakman wrote:

                                    No, I am afraid that you'll find out when you grow up, that there isn't - and even when there is, no-one wants to hear it.

                                    There is always a reason that things happen, it's just that sometimes you have yet to find out what it is. And it depends what it is, as to whether no-one wants to hear it. I'm still trying to figure it out, but I know that I have to never tell anybody anything about me.

                                    R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    Rob Graham
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                    There is always a reason that things happen

                                    Quantum mechanics suggests that your view of causality may be vastly oversimplified. ;P

                                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R Rob Graham

                                      Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

                                      There is always a reason that things happen

                                      Quantum mechanics suggests that your view of causality may be vastly oversimplified. ;P

                                      S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      soap brain
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      Particles? Bah! They do whatever I tell them to do, exactly as fast as I want.

                                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S soap brain

                                        Particles? Bah! They do whatever I tell them to do, exactly as fast as I want.

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        Rob Graham
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        Last time I checked, sometimes "shit happens" no "because" required...

                                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R Rob Graham

                                          Last time I checked, sometimes "shit happens" no "because" required...

                                          S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          soap brain
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          Well, you should check again. There's always a 'because', you can thank the conservation laws and thermodynamics for that.

                                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups