Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Obama eschews European Socialism

Obama eschews European Socialism

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
business
20 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Synaptrik

    Rob Graham wrote:

    but expect Obama to seize just as much control as congress is willing to go along with, and not a bit less.

    One thing is for sure. Its refreshing to see people who supported this with Bush opposed to it with Obama. And no, I don't support this with either president. But I distinctly remember a whole lot of support for Bush's abuse of power. War-time yada yada, Lincoln did it.. yada yada... Nice to see that you do find cognitive dissonance with this behavior.

    This statement is false

    O Offline
    O Offline
    Oakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    Synaptrik wrote:

    Its refreshing to see people who supported this with Bush opposed to it with Obama.

    I don't think you meant Rob, but it might read to some, as if you did. I agree that there are plenty of flipfloppers out there who, because a different party or philosophy is in power now complain about what they applauded and cheer, what they deplored. The truth, as I see it, is that Obama is simply better at coming up with ways to pick the pockets of our kids than Bush was and yet Obama owes a great debt to Bush for showing him the way.

    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Synaptrik

      Rob Graham wrote:

      but expect Obama to seize just as much control as congress is willing to go along with, and not a bit less.

      One thing is for sure. Its refreshing to see people who supported this with Bush opposed to it with Obama. And no, I don't support this with either president. But I distinctly remember a whole lot of support for Bush's abuse of power. War-time yada yada, Lincoln did it.. yada yada... Nice to see that you do find cognitive dissonance with this behavior.

      This statement is false

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Rob Graham
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      Synaptrik wrote:

      But I distinctly remember a whole lot of support for Bush's abuse of power. War-time yada yada, Lincoln did it.. yada yada...

      I think you are confusing me with either Stan or Red. Obama has already exceeded Bush's reach in many cases. I think the cognitive dissonance might be yours.

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Rob Graham

        Synaptrik wrote:

        But I distinctly remember a whole lot of support for Bush's abuse of power. War-time yada yada, Lincoln did it.. yada yada...

        I think you are confusing me with either Stan or Red. Obama has already exceeded Bush's reach in many cases. I think the cognitive dissonance might be yours.

        S Offline
        S Offline
        Stan Shannon
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        Rob Graham wrote:

        I think you are confusing me with either Stan or Red.

        I'm certainly not the flip-flopper. I fully support Obama's power grab. Just as I supported Bush's and would have supported Lincoln. That isn't to say I agree with them. But when people get elected they should try to do what they said they would. I hope republicans are taking notes. I blame every abuse of power on congress. They are the one's not doing their jobs.

        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

        R O 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • S Stan Shannon

          Rob Graham wrote:

          I think you are confusing me with either Stan or Red.

          I'm certainly not the flip-flopper. I fully support Obama's power grab. Just as I supported Bush's and would have supported Lincoln. That isn't to say I agree with them. But when people get elected they should try to do what they said they would. I hope republicans are taking notes. I blame every abuse of power on congress. They are the one's not doing their jobs.

          Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

          R Offline
          R Offline
          Rob Graham
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          Stan Shannon wrote:

          I blame every abuse of power on congress. They are the one's not doing their jobs.

          I agree heartily.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Stan Shannon

            Rob Graham wrote:

            I think you are confusing me with either Stan or Red.

            I'm certainly not the flip-flopper. I fully support Obama's power grab. Just as I supported Bush's and would have supported Lincoln. That isn't to say I agree with them. But when people get elected they should try to do what they said they would. I hope republicans are taking notes. I blame every abuse of power on congress. They are the one's not doing their jobs.

            Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

            O Offline
            O Offline
            Oakman
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            Stan Shannon wrote:

            I fully support Obama's power grab. Just as I supported Bush's and would have supported Lincoln.

            Mugabe? Chavez? al-Bashir?

            Stan Shannon wrote:

            But when people get elected they should try to do what they said they would.

            The way Lenin did, and Adolph Schicklegruber.

            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

            S 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O Oakman

              Stan Shannon wrote:

              I fully support Obama's power grab. Just as I supported Bush's and would have supported Lincoln.

              Mugabe? Chavez? al-Bashir?

              Stan Shannon wrote:

              But when people get elected they should try to do what they said they would.

              The way Lenin did, and Adolph Schicklegruber.

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stan Shannon
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              I hate to break the news to you, Jon, but social organizataion requires leadership. One would have thought you would have learned that in the Army.

              Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

              O 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Stan Shannon

                I hate to break the news to you, Jon, but social organizataion requires leadership. One would have thought you would have learned that in the Army.

                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                O Offline
                O Offline
                Oakman
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                Stan Shannon wrote:

                One would have thought you would have learned that in the Army.

                I also learned the meaning of "frag him" - always a useful concept when leaders turned out to have graduated CW Post ROTC. ;) Leadership, Stan, is not a synonym for lawbreaking with impugnity. Nor is the concept that the ends justifies the means particularly Jeffersonian.

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O Oakman

                  Stan Shannon wrote:

                  One would have thought you would have learned that in the Army.

                  I also learned the meaning of "frag him" - always a useful concept when leaders turned out to have graduated CW Post ROTC. ;) Leadership, Stan, is not a synonym for lawbreaking with impugnity. Nor is the concept that the ends justifies the means particularly Jeffersonian.

                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Stan Shannon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  Oakman wrote:

                  a useful concept when leaders turned out to have graduated CW Post ROTC.

                  Which is why I'm glad I never had to lead anyone in combat... :~

                  Oakman wrote:

                  Leadership, Stan, is not a synonym for lawbreaking with impugnity.

                  Unless lawbreaking with impugnity is what is required. But, again, that determination is why we have congress. When they say the president is breaking the law with impunity, I will listen. Until then, he can do whatever the hell he pleases for all I care.

                  Oakman wrote:

                  Nor is the concept that the ends justifies the means particularly Jeffersonian.

                  Louisiana.

                  Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                  O 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Stan Shannon

                    Oakman wrote:

                    a useful concept when leaders turned out to have graduated CW Post ROTC.

                    Which is why I'm glad I never had to lead anyone in combat... :~

                    Oakman wrote:

                    Leadership, Stan, is not a synonym for lawbreaking with impugnity.

                    Unless lawbreaking with impugnity is what is required. But, again, that determination is why we have congress. When they say the president is breaking the law with impunity, I will listen. Until then, he can do whatever the hell he pleases for all I care.

                    Oakman wrote:

                    Nor is the concept that the ends justifies the means particularly Jeffersonian.

                    Louisiana.

                    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                    O Offline
                    O Offline
                    Oakman
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                    Which is why I'm glad I never had to lead anyone in combat...

                    As one field first put it to me, it's easy - just yell "follow me!" and start running - but remember to run towards the black pj's.

                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                    When they say the president is breaking the law with impunity

                    Your faith in Pelosi and Reid is touching. But hardly believable in a man of some intelligence. Kind of like saying, "As soon as the canary swallows the cat, I'll get a dog."

                    Stan Shannon wrote:

                    Louisiana.

                    Good point.

                    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • O Oakman

                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                      Which is why I'm glad I never had to lead anyone in combat...

                      As one field first put it to me, it's easy - just yell "follow me!" and start running - but remember to run towards the black pj's.

                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                      When they say the president is breaking the law with impunity

                      Your faith in Pelosi and Reid is touching. But hardly believable in a man of some intelligence. Kind of like saying, "As soon as the canary swallows the cat, I'll get a dog."

                      Stan Shannon wrote:

                      Louisiana.

                      Good point.

                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Stan Shannon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      Oakman wrote:

                      Your faith in Pelosi and Reid is touching.

                      Are you kidding? Pelosi and Reid are two of the most trustworthy people in politics. My faith in them will be amply rewarded, I'm sure.

                      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups