Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Does this bother anyone else?

Does this bother anyone else?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
57 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Chris Austin

    For growing hops and barley?

    Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --?

    O Offline
    O Offline
    Oakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #43

    Chris Austin wrote:

    For growing hops and barley?

    Tax evasion

    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Rob Graham

      And you don't and you can't. ;P

      O Offline
      O Offline
      Oakman
      wrote on last edited by
      #44

      Rob Graham wrote:

      And you don't and you can't.

      And I did (4 packs a day) and I don't even try.

      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F fred_

        Oakman wrote:

        It shouldn't. It should to the non-smokers who are forced to breathe the same air

        Isn't that the reason public smoking is mostly banned? Isn't going to those people either.

        O Offline
        O Offline
        Oakman
        wrote on last edited by
        #45

        fred_ wrote:

        Isn't that the reason public smoking is mostly banned?

        Ever see Mommie light up in the car when she has two kids strapped down in the back seat? Ever get called into the boss's private office and put up with him lighting up while he discusses something important to you?

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F fred_

          Generally I agree about tying. However the smokers are demonized by this tax. And in my experience in this state ( cannot speak for all as I haven't researched it ), I can be treated for smoking related issues using ( I have private) insurance, but smoking-cessation treatments aren't covered. There really is no benefit flowing back to that payer of the tax

          O Offline
          O Offline
          Oakman
          wrote on last edited by
          #46

          fred_ wrote:

          I can be treated for smoking related issues using ( I have private) insurance,

          And collecting on it for your self-induced problems drives the rate up for everyone.

          fred_ wrote:

          but smoking-cessation treatments aren't covered.

          You want to quit? Quit. Don't worry about the insurance. I went from 4 packs a day to zero at noon on April 12, 1993 without asking my insurance company to pony up a nickle.

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T Tim Craig

            John Carson wrote:

            Sure. After all, prohibition worked a treat.

            Not to mention that kind of policy also keeps pot, cocaine, heroin, meth,.... off the market in the US. :rolleyes:

            "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

            I'm a proud denizen of the Real Soapbox[^]
            ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!!!

            O Offline
            O Offline
            Oakman
            wrote on last edited by
            #47

            Tim Craig wrote:

            Not to mention that kind of policy also keeps pot, cocaine, heroin, meth,.... off the market in the US

            You betcha. It's much easier to find it in the schools than the supermarkets.

            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

            modified on Saturday, April 4, 2009 5:40 PM

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O Oakman

              Chris Austin wrote:

              For growing hops and barley?

              Tax evasion

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

              C Offline
              C Offline
              Chris Austin
              wrote on last edited by
              #48

              :laugh:

              Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Chris Austin

                Rob Graham wrote:

                If they really gave a damn about the impact smokers have on the health care system they would stop subsidizing Tobacco farmers (to the tune of 530 million since 1997) and prohibit the sale of all tobacco products (as they do for other dangerous drugs)

                Thats a lot of money. I imagine it is just a drop in the bucket compared to the subsidizes the corn farmers get. My nephew's father lives off the money he is paid for not farming his high dollar land in Iowa. Shameful.

                Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --?

                modified on Friday, April 3, 2009 5:37 PM

                V Offline
                V Offline
                Vikram A Punathambekar
                wrote on last edited by
                #49

                Chris Austin wrote:

                My nephew's father lives off the money he is paid for not farming his high dollar land in Iowa

                Umm, what? Mind explaining?

                Cheers, Vıkram.

                Carpe Diem.

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Rob Graham

                  And you don't and you can't. ;P

                  T Offline
                  T Offline
                  Tim Craig
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #50

                  Yep, and I didn't try because I don't care about his tax. ;P Just helped him categorize his position on the argument. Now a tax I could get behind is politicians paying taxes on their slush funds.

                  "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

                  I'm a proud denizen of the Real Soapbox[^]
                  ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!!!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F fred_

                    Am curious to know out of all the responders how many are opposed to smoking and if so do you feel you can be objective in this discussion? and visa-versa

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Synaptrik
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #51

                    Smoked for 15 years. Would still smoke if my lungs allowed it. No objection to it. Regardless of who the taxes go directly to the idea I was playing advocate to was that it acts as an offset to the burden placed on the system by smokers. But then I quit when it was still less than 2 bux a pack.

                    This statement is false

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Chris Austin

                      For growing hops and barley?

                      Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --?

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Synaptrik
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #52

                      Commerce clause. Wheat farmers had to stop growing wheat for personal consumption as it interfered with inter-state commerce. Now that's a law I don't quite agree with.

                      This statement is false

                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Synaptrik

                        Commerce clause. Wheat farmers had to stop growing wheat for personal consumption as it interfered with inter-state commerce. Now that's a law I don't quite agree with.

                        This statement is false

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        Chris Austin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #53

                        My understanding of the commerce clause is that it only applies if you are operating in attempt to make a profit. In my case I wouldn't sell diddly. But, I do think the wheat thing was established because of a quota system or something like that. i.e. that buy growing it you were interfering with interstate commerce. Really stupid.

                        Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --?

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • V Vikram A Punathambekar

                          Chris Austin wrote:

                          My nephew's father lives off the money he is paid for not farming his high dollar land in Iowa

                          Umm, what? Mind explaining?

                          Cheers, Vıkram.

                          Carpe Diem.

                          C Offline
                          C Offline
                          Chris Austin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #54

                          Not much to explain. My nephew's father has some beautiful farm land in Fort Dodge, Iowa that he does not farm because he receives subsidizes to keep his land fallow.

                          Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --?

                          V 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C Chris Austin

                            Not much to explain. My nephew's father has some beautiful farm land in Fort Dodge, Iowa that he does not farm because he receives subsidizes to keep his land fallow.

                            Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --?

                            V Offline
                            V Offline
                            Vikram A Punathambekar
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #55

                            Sorry, that is the point I don't understand - why does the Govt pay people *not* to farm? Apparently, it's in the Govt's interest your relative doesn't plough his land - but why?

                            Cheers, Vıkram.

                            Carpe Diem.

                            C 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • V Vikram A Punathambekar

                              Sorry, that is the point I don't understand - why does the Govt pay people *not* to farm? Apparently, it's in the Govt's interest your relative doesn't plough his land - but why?

                              Cheers, Vıkram.

                              Carpe Diem.

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              Chris Austin
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #56

                              I don't know. Sorry. I just makes me sick to think about.

                              Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C Chris Austin

                                My understanding of the commerce clause is that it only applies if you are operating in attempt to make a profit. In my case I wouldn't sell diddly. But, I do think the wheat thing was established because of a quota system or something like that. i.e. that buy growing it you were interfering with interstate commerce. Really stupid.

                                Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --?

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Synaptrik
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #57

                                Nope. Its one of the troubles that faces the medical marijuana situation in California as well. Heh. Yeah, I agree its stupid. But its also what the Kennedy's used in the 60s for civil rights. Google for details, but I found it an interesting backfire.

                                This statement is false

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups