Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. When Jurors Talk Back

When Jurors Talk Back

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcomhelpannouncement
18 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I Ilion

    :rolleyes: You're such a "troll." And such a fool.

    O Offline
    O Offline
    Oakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    Ilíon wrote:

    You're such a "troll." And such a fool.

    And you are so predictable. Thank you for bringing so much laughter into my life.

    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

    I 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • O Oakman

      wolfbinary wrote:

      but if I didn't understand something or it seemed like spin I'd like to ask some questions.

      I think it might make great good sense for jurrors to submit their questions to the judge. If they wouldn't create grounds for a mistrial or an appeal, he could ask them.

      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

      I Offline
      I Offline
      Ilion
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      Oakman wrote:

      I think it might make great good sense for jurrors to submit their questions to the judge. If they wouldn't create grounds for a mistrial or an appeal, he could ask them.

      In the criminal case for which I was a juror, the prosecution had one witness. At one point, the presecutor asked her a question; her answer was at best neutral in respect to his case. A few minutes later, he summed up her testimony to that point and asked her whether he had it right ... except that he turned that one answer into exactly the opposite of what she'd said. No one but me caught that little twist. When the jury were finally sent off to deliberate, the rest were all for convicting the defendant (a young black man): everyone from the good old boy to the bleeding heart white woman to the circle-the-wagons-and-protect-our-children-at-all-costs black woman to the racial-chip-on-his-shoulder black man (who seriously misunderstood me). If I had been one more person like the rest, the man would have been convicted within five minutes. Now, as it turns out, I give no credence to the defendent's defence ("I didn't know it was there"). Which is to say, I believed that he was guilty, as charged, of having a concealed weapon ... but I also believed that the charge was essentially bullshit. So, I was able to interest enough of the rest of the jury in having the transcript read to us -- it took forever for the recorder to find the relevant place. After that, and given the adamant natures of certain of the jurors, agreement was impossible. And while I was voting for conviction (once the rest of the jury was cognizant of the prosecutor's "slip"), I was quite happy with the hung jury result -- I just couldn't see sending the kid to prison without even thinking about what we were being called to do. I suspect that on his retrial, if there even was one, he was acquited. Or, if he was sent to prison, it was a short sentence. I happened to run into him perhaps a couple of years later (I have no idea whether he recognized me, and I certainly said nothing to him) in the company of a young woman and a new-born.

      O 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • O Oakman

        Ilíon wrote:

        You're such a "troll." And such a fool.

        And you are so predictable. Thank you for bringing so much laughter into my life.

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

        I Offline
        I Offline
        Ilion
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        Oakman wrote:

        And you are so predictable. Thank you for bringing so much laughter into my life.

        Ah, so you're also simple? After all, who else but a simpleton could have "so much laughter into [his] life" due to another being "so predictable?" :laugh:

        O 0 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • I Ilion

          Oakman wrote:

          And you are so predictable. Thank you for bringing so much laughter into my life.

          Ah, so you're also simple? After all, who else but a simpleton could have "so much laughter into [his] life" due to another being "so predictable?" :laugh:

          O Offline
          O Offline
          Oakman
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          Ilíon wrote:

          After all, who else but a simpleton could have "so much laughter into [his] life" due to another being "so predictable

          Don't you like being a figure of fun, Troy? Ever since Jim Baccus stopped doing Mr. Magoo, no-one else has portrayed pompous obliviousness half as well as you do.

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • I Ilion

            Oakman wrote:

            I think it might make great good sense for jurrors to submit their questions to the judge. If they wouldn't create grounds for a mistrial or an appeal, he could ask them.

            In the criminal case for which I was a juror, the prosecution had one witness. At one point, the presecutor asked her a question; her answer was at best neutral in respect to his case. A few minutes later, he summed up her testimony to that point and asked her whether he had it right ... except that he turned that one answer into exactly the opposite of what she'd said. No one but me caught that little twist. When the jury were finally sent off to deliberate, the rest were all for convicting the defendant (a young black man): everyone from the good old boy to the bleeding heart white woman to the circle-the-wagons-and-protect-our-children-at-all-costs black woman to the racial-chip-on-his-shoulder black man (who seriously misunderstood me). If I had been one more person like the rest, the man would have been convicted within five minutes. Now, as it turns out, I give no credence to the defendent's defence ("I didn't know it was there"). Which is to say, I believed that he was guilty, as charged, of having a concealed weapon ... but I also believed that the charge was essentially bullshit. So, I was able to interest enough of the rest of the jury in having the transcript read to us -- it took forever for the recorder to find the relevant place. After that, and given the adamant natures of certain of the jurors, agreement was impossible. And while I was voting for conviction (once the rest of the jury was cognizant of the prosecutor's "slip"), I was quite happy with the hung jury result -- I just couldn't see sending the kid to prison without even thinking about what we were being called to do. I suspect that on his retrial, if there even was one, he was acquited. Or, if he was sent to prison, it was a short sentence. I happened to run into him perhaps a couple of years later (I have no idea whether he recognized me, and I certainly said nothing to him) in the company of a young woman and a new-born.

            O Offline
            O Offline
            Oakman
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            Sounds like you did the right thing and stuck to your guns when it would have been easier not to.

            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

            I 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • I Ilion

              Oakman wrote:

              And you are so predictable. Thank you for bringing so much laughter into my life.

              Ah, so you're also simple? After all, who else but a simpleton could have "so much laughter into [his] life" due to another being "so predictable?" :laugh:

              0 Offline
              0 Offline
              0x3c0
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              Oakman: 'simpleton' Ilion: singleton

              I 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • O Oakman

                Sounds like you did the right thing and stuck to your guns when it would have been easier not to.

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                I Offline
                I Offline
                Ilion
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                Oakman wrote:

                Sounds like you did the right thing and stuck to your guns when it would have been easier not to.

                It's deliberate life-long habit: I always oppose injustice and the unthinking "go along to get along" mindset which so frequently enables injustice. Which, doubtless, goes far to explain why you are so often at loggerheads with me.

                O 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • 0 0x3c0

                  Oakman: 'simpleton' Ilion: singleton

                  I Offline
                  I Offline
                  Ilion
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  True, I was not one of a set of twins.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • I Ilion

                    Oakman wrote:

                    Sounds like you did the right thing and stuck to your guns when it would have been easier not to.

                    It's deliberate life-long habit: I always oppose injustice and the unthinking "go along to get along" mindset which so frequently enables injustice. Which, doubtless, goes far to explain why you are so often at loggerheads with me.

                    O Offline
                    O Offline
                    Oakman
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    Ilíon wrote:

                    Which, doubtless, goes far to explain why you are so often at loggerheads with me.

                    Probably. I keep my bullshit detector set to very high.

                    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                    T I 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • O Oakman

                      Ilíon wrote:

                      Which, doubtless, goes far to explain why you are so often at loggerheads with me.

                      Probably. I keep my bullshit detector set to very high.

                      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                      T Offline
                      T Offline
                      Tim Craig
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      Oakman wrote:

                      Probably. I keep my bullsh*t detector set to very high.

                      I think the output would saturate on Ilion even on its lowest setting. :laugh:

                      "Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it." -- P.J. O'Rourke

                      I'm a proud denizen of the Real Soapbox[^]
                      ACCEPT NO SUBSTITUTES!!!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • O Oakman

                        Ilíon wrote:

                        Which, doubtless, goes far to explain why you are so often at loggerheads with me.

                        Probably. I keep my bullshit detector set to very high.

                        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface

                        I Offline
                        I Offline
                        Ilion
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        Oakman wrote:

                        Probably. I keep my bullsh*t detector set to very high.

                        You'd need to, wouldn't you, just to get through the day? ... I mean, if you left on the low setting, it'd go off everytime you opened your mouth.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups