You would think more than ever with this virus they would close the border
-
I never realized that Napolitano was a Mexican name. How silly of me to think it was Italian.
-
Isn't it amazing how a moral imperative can blind a culture to every other possible contingency? There are those who warn us of the danger to our society of christian zealotry. But I don't care what anyone says, the new "you must be open, you must be tolerant, you must be inclusive, in all things in all ways" is indistinquisable from any moral mandate of any religion on this planet. Except that it has no limitations regarding separation of church and state that other religions are constrained by. Like it or not, humanism has become the religion of the state for any practical purpose.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
Presumably you are referring to the current Swine Flu outbreak affecting Mexico and USA? If so, it has got the WHO in Geneva all hot and bothered [^], looks like they will declare the outbreak “a public health event of international concern". What with an international financial crisis and now a potential international public health crisis, makes you wonder what's next.
-
Presumably you are referring to the current Swine Flu outbreak affecting Mexico and USA? If so, it has got the WHO in Geneva all hot and bothered [^], looks like they will declare the outbreak “a public health event of international concern". What with an international financial crisis and now a potential international public health crisis, makes you wonder what's next.
WHO is concerned and attempting to formulate a plan. CDC says "nothing we can do". When did the "we can do" agency, the agency that "saved ET" is powerless. DHS, can't protect the border. What a bunch of sad-sacks-of-sh**. I am looking for a responsible country to say "we've closed are borders" to the US and Mexico.
-
I never realized that Napolitano was a Mexican name. How silly of me to think it was Italian.
-
Isn't it amazing how a moral imperative can blind a culture to every other possible contingency? There are those who warn us of the danger to our society of christian zealotry. But I don't care what anyone says, the new "you must be open, you must be tolerant, you must be inclusive, in all things in all ways" is indistinquisable from any moral mandate of any religion on this planet. Except that it has no limitations regarding separation of church and state that other religions are constrained by. Like it or not, humanism has become the religion of the state for any practical purpose.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
WHO is concerned and attempting to formulate a plan. CDC says "nothing we can do". When did the "we can do" agency, the agency that "saved ET" is powerless. DHS, can't protect the border. What a bunch of sad-sacks-of-sh**. I am looking for a responsible country to say "we've closed are borders" to the US and Mexico.
Borders to Asian countries, and other countries, were not closed during the many bird flu incidents this last few years. Borders are not water-tight, they leak, as is shown by illegal immigration from Mexico to USA. Consequently, this virus will also travel with the leak.
-
I don't know how separation of church and state, humanism and such have anything to do with protecting the border against disease ridden illegal aliens?
kmg365 wrote:
I don't know how separation of church and state, humanism and such have anything to do with protecting the border against disease ridden illegal aliens?
Because the only possible reason we would not immediately shut down the border with a neighboring country in the early stages of a possible pandemic without hesitation is because it would violate the tenants of humanism. It would be intolerant, prejudicial, bigoted. If we could shut the border down for that reason, we could shut it down for any other reason that might be to our own advantage and to their disadvantage. We should all share in the diseases equally because we are all the same. It is simple social justice.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
WHO is concerned and attempting to formulate a plan. CDC says "nothing we can do". When did the "we can do" agency, the agency that "saved ET" is powerless. DHS, can't protect the border. What a bunch of sad-sacks-of-sh**. I am looking for a responsible country to say "we've closed are borders" to the US and Mexico.
kmg365 wrote:
DHS, can'tdoesnt want to protect the border.
FTFY.
-
kmg365 wrote:
I don't know how separation of church and state, humanism and such have anything to do with protecting the border against disease ridden illegal aliens?
Because the only possible reason we would not immediately shut down the border with a neighboring country in the early stages of a possible pandemic without hesitation is because it would violate the tenants of humanism. It would be intolerant, prejudicial, bigoted. If we could shut the border down for that reason, we could shut it down for any other reason that might be to our own advantage and to their disadvantage. We should all share in the diseases equally because we are all the same. It is simple social justice.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
-
kmg365 wrote:
DHS, can'tdoesnt want to protect the border.
FTFY.
-
Gringo flu?[^] CDC officials described the virus as having a unique combination of gene segments not seen before in people or pigs. The bug contains human virus, avian virus from North America and pig viruses from North America, Europe and Asia.
Bob Emmett
-
kmg365 wrote:
I don't know how separation of church and state, humanism and such have anything to do with protecting the border against disease ridden illegal aliens?
Because the only possible reason we would not immediately shut down the border with a neighboring country in the early stages of a possible pandemic without hesitation is because it would violate the tenants of humanism. It would be intolerant, prejudicial, bigoted. If we could shut the border down for that reason, we could shut it down for any other reason that might be to our own advantage and to their disadvantage. We should all share in the diseases equally because we are all the same. It is simple social justice.
Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.
Stan Shannon wrote:
Because the only possible reason we would not immediately shut down the border with a neighboring country in the early stages of a possible pandemic without hesitation is because it would violate the tenants of humanism.
Yeah, all that humanistic crap about the good Samaritan and "What ye do to the least of these, ye do unto me." Thank God, Christianity doesn't spew that kind of doggerel.
Stan Shannon wrote:
It would be intolerant, prejudicial, bigoted.
So you are saying these are the Christian virtues? "Blessed are the bigoted because God only loves white guys?"
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
WHO is concerned and attempting to formulate a plan. CDC says "nothing we can do". When did the "we can do" agency, the agency that "saved ET" is powerless. DHS, can't protect the border. What a bunch of sad-sacks-of-sh**. I am looking for a responsible country to say "we've closed are borders" to the US and Mexico.
kmg365 wrote:
DHS, can't protect the border.
We've got 50 kids in New York, back from a highschool trip to Mexico, down with the "flu-like symptoms." I wish to hell that we were patrolling the border with armed soldiers and doing everything in out power to arrest and punish people who come across our border illegally. They are turning some of our cities into hellholes and pigstyes. But never, ever, has a pandemic been prevented by "closing" a border. Today's technology makes it less likely.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
kmg365 wrote:
DHS, can't protect the border.
We've got 50 kids in New York, back from a highschool trip to Mexico, down with the "flu-like symptoms." I wish to hell that we were patrolling the border with armed soldiers and doing everything in out power to arrest and punish people who come across our border illegally. They are turning some of our cities into hellholes and pigstyes. But never, ever, has a pandemic been prevented by "closing" a border. Today's technology makes it less likely.
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin
-
Gringo flu?[^] CDC officials described the virus as having a unique combination of gene segments not seen before in people or pigs. The bug contains human virus, avian virus from North America and pig viruses from North America, Europe and Asia.
Bob Emmett
-
Oakman wrote:
But never, ever, has a pandemic been prevented by "closing" a border. Today's technology makes it less likely.
I wonder if the Jews of ghettos of medieval Europe would agree.
-
This is why I never have a problem with the money good plumbers make.
Sovereign ingredient for a happy marriage: Pay cash or do without. Interest charges not only eat up a household budget; awareness of debt eats up domestic felicity. --Lazarus Long Avoid the crowd. Do your own thinking independently. Be the chess player, not the chess piece. --Ralph Charell
-
Oakman wrote:
But never, ever, has a pandemic been prevented by "closing" a border. Today's technology makes it less likely.
I wonder if the Jews of ghettos of medieval Europe would agree.
kmg365 wrote:
I wonder if the Jews of ghettos of medieval Europe would agree.
Since Typhus is spread by lice, what difference would it make? Or are you thinking of something else?
Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin