Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. From the Weird News desk: Israel renames 'unkosher' swine flu

From the Weird News desk: Israel renames 'unkosher' swine flu

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comquestionannouncement
35 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Nish Nishant

    Oakman wrote:

    Frankly, all I wanted to do was to let Vikram experience what it was like when his country was held up to ridicule because of the religious beliefs of some of its politicians.

    I don't think he was trying to ridicule Jewish beliefs. He was wondering why saying the word "swine" would go against their religious beliefs. The equivalent would be an Indian politician banning the use of the word "beef" in India. (There are some people in India crazy enough to do that too). Anyway, even assuming some nut politician in India did just that, why should that automatically mean that no Indian should ridicule non-Indian cultural stupidity? I think people here should have the freedom to publicly criticize both their home cultures as well as foreign cultures.

    Regards, Nish


    Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
    My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link

    O Offline
    O Offline
    Oakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

    I think people here should have the freedom to publicly criticize both their home cultures as well as foreign cultures.

    In which case you have no beef with me - or pork either. Unless of course, you think that India is untouchable and it wouldn't be kosher to criticise it.

    Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • O Oakman

      Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

      I think people here should have the freedom to publicly criticize both their home cultures as well as foreign cultures.

      In which case you have no beef with me - or pork either. Unless of course, you think that India is untouchable and it wouldn't be kosher to criticise it.

      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

      N Offline
      N Offline
      Nish Nishant
      wrote on last edited by
      #27

      Oakman wrote:

      Unless of course, you think that India is untouchable and it wouldn't be kosher to criticise it.

      I have absolutely no problem in you or anyone else criticizing India :-) I just don't understand the reasoning behind your insinuation that Vikram cannot criticize Israel because he comes from a less-than-perfect country himself. That's almost like Adnan replying to every thread where someone mentions Islamic terrorism with an off-topic retort about christian, jewish, or hindu attacks.

      Regards, Nish


      Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
      My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link

      O 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Nish Nishant

        Oakman wrote:

        Unless of course, you think that India is untouchable and it wouldn't be kosher to criticise it.

        I have absolutely no problem in you or anyone else criticizing India :-) I just don't understand the reasoning behind your insinuation that Vikram cannot criticize Israel because he comes from a less-than-perfect country himself. That's almost like Adnan replying to every thread where someone mentions Islamic terrorism with an off-topic retort about christian, jewish, or hindu attacks.

        Regards, Nish


        Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
        My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link

        O Offline
        O Offline
        Oakman
        wrote on last edited by
        #28

        Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

        I just don't understand the reasoning behind your insinuation that Vikram cannot criticize Israel because he comes from a less-than-perfect country himself.

        Don't try to figure out what I might or might not be insinuating - if you're confused about what I mean, ask me. Had Vikram said "What is wrong with that woman?" I would not have said "Boo." Had he said, "What is wrong with ultra-conservative Jews?" I wouldn't have thought twice. But "What is wrong with these people?" is too broad a brush to paint with, for me not to see if he can take it as well as he can hand it out. Had I dredged up the news story that came out a little while ago about the chairman of a commission funded by your majority party saying that rubbing cow dung over one's body would protect from nuclear attack, and used words that implied this was S.O.P. in your country of origin, something tells me that the response would not have been positive. My much milder (and bang-on-accurate) comment already drew far more reaction than it needed to.

        Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

        That's almost like Adnan replying

        Now that you bring him up, what is the difference between Vikram's post and Adnan's gratuitous OP attacks on India and/or the US for the actions or words of a few of its citizens?

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

        N 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Nish Nishant

          Vikram A Punathambekar wrote:

          Erm, most Hindus I know consider eating beef taboo but they will proudly* show off their leather shoes or car seat covers.

          Vikram A Punathambekar wrote:

          * I consider that a bad thing, but that's a whole other kettle of fish. They are by and large hypocrites.

          Why do you think they are hypocrites? Vegetarianism is culturally part of Hinduism, and kids grow up as vegetarians or at least as chicken-vegetarians (no red meat). How would using leather contradict with their vegetarian habits? What about milk then? Cattle are kept under domestic captivity to get milk - doesn't sound a lot better than skinning them for leather. (minus the whole having to kill them thing of course) :-) As a Hindu* who'd rather be dead** than have to live without beef/pork food products do note that I am seriously interested in your view as an agnostic Hindu vegetarian who's non-vegan. * admittedly an atheist ** half kidding there, but I do love pork and beef :-)

          Regards, Nish


          Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
          My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link

          modified on Tuesday, April 28, 2009 9:41 PM

          V Offline
          V Offline
          Vikram A Punathambekar
          wrote on last edited by
          #29

          Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

          Why do you think they are hypocrites?

          Because it isn't so much about killing them for food as it is about killing them. I mean, "You can't kill them and eat them, but you can kill them and wear them" sounds extremely hollow to me.

          Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

          Vegetarianism is culturally part of Hinduism

          Ahimsa is culturally part of Hinduism, and vegetarianism follows from that. Of course, that's just my opinion.

          Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

          Cattle are kept under domestic captivity to get milk - doesn't sound a lot better than skinning them for leather.

          :wtf: Milking a cow is a far way from killing it. Calling me an "agnostic Hindu" is a bit of an oxymoron. I am at best culturally Hindu (whatever that may mean ;) ); I privately despise many practices of Hinduism.

          Cheers, Vikram.

          Current activities: Films: Sense and Sensibility TV series: Friends, season 2 Books: Longitude, by Dava Sobel.


          Carpe Diem.

          N 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • V Vikram A Punathambekar

            Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

            Why do you think they are hypocrites?

            Because it isn't so much about killing them for food as it is about killing them. I mean, "You can't kill them and eat them, but you can kill them and wear them" sounds extremely hollow to me.

            Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

            Vegetarianism is culturally part of Hinduism

            Ahimsa is culturally part of Hinduism, and vegetarianism follows from that. Of course, that's just my opinion.

            Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

            Cattle are kept under domestic captivity to get milk - doesn't sound a lot better than skinning them for leather.

            :wtf: Milking a cow is a far way from killing it. Calling me an "agnostic Hindu" is a bit of an oxymoron. I am at best culturally Hindu (whatever that may mean ;) ); I privately despise many practices of Hinduism.

            Cheers, Vikram.

            Current activities: Films: Sense and Sensibility TV series: Friends, season 2 Books: Longitude, by Dava Sobel.


            Carpe Diem.

            N Offline
            N Offline
            Nish Nishant
            wrote on last edited by
            #30

            Vikram A Punathambekar wrote:

            I mean, "You can't kill them and eat them, but you can kill them and wear them" sounds extremely hollow to me.

            Good point, but at least in my family there are a few vegetarians who don't really do it for ahimsa. It's just a habit they had from childhood. [very unusual for mallus to be vegetarians, so having these folks visit is a hassle as you need to prepare extra dishes just for them] :-)

            Vikram A Punathambekar wrote:

            Calling me an "agnostic Hindu" is a bit of an oxymoron. I am at best culturally Hindu (whatever that may mean Wink ); I privately despise many practices of Hinduism.

            I meant Hindu in the cultural sense. I am an atheist yet in some ways people would probably call me a Hindu (though I myself can't think of one single reason to do that).

            Regards, Nish


            Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
            My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O Oakman

              Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

              I just don't understand the reasoning behind your insinuation that Vikram cannot criticize Israel because he comes from a less-than-perfect country himself.

              Don't try to figure out what I might or might not be insinuating - if you're confused about what I mean, ask me. Had Vikram said "What is wrong with that woman?" I would not have said "Boo." Had he said, "What is wrong with ultra-conservative Jews?" I wouldn't have thought twice. But "What is wrong with these people?" is too broad a brush to paint with, for me not to see if he can take it as well as he can hand it out. Had I dredged up the news story that came out a little while ago about the chairman of a commission funded by your majority party saying that rubbing cow dung over one's body would protect from nuclear attack, and used words that implied this was S.O.P. in your country of origin, something tells me that the response would not have been positive. My much milder (and bang-on-accurate) comment already drew far more reaction than it needed to.

              Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

              That's almost like Adnan replying

              Now that you bring him up, what is the difference between Vikram's post and Adnan's gratuitous OP attacks on India and/or the US for the actions or words of a few of its citizens?

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

              N Offline
              N Offline
              Nish Nishant
              wrote on last edited by
              #31

              Oakman wrote:

              But "What is wrong with these people?" is too broad a brush to paint with, for me not to see if he can take it as well as he can hand it out.

              Uhm, I didn't see it that way. I'd be very surprised if he meant every Israeli by "these people". I believe he meant the religiously fanatic among them. Kinda like how when you see some news article on say the octo-mum incident and you say, "what the hell is wrong with these people" - you don't really mean every person from that state (or country). Of course neither of us can say for sure what exactly Vikram meant, so at this point we are both theorizing here :-)

              Regards, Nish


              Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
              My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Nish Nishant

                Oakman wrote:

                But "What is wrong with these people?" is too broad a brush to paint with, for me not to see if he can take it as well as he can hand it out.

                Uhm, I didn't see it that way. I'd be very surprised if he meant every Israeli by "these people". I believe he meant the religiously fanatic among them. Kinda like how when you see some news article on say the octo-mum incident and you say, "what the hell is wrong with these people" - you don't really mean every person from that state (or country). Of course neither of us can say for sure what exactly Vikram meant, so at this point we are both theorizing here :-)

                Regards, Nish


                Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
                My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link

                S Offline
                S Offline
                Synaptrik
                wrote on last edited by
                #32

                There is no reasoning with a person bent on fomenting argument.

                This statement is false

                N 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Synaptrik

                  There is no reasoning with a person bent on fomenting argument.

                  This statement is false

                  N Offline
                  N Offline
                  Nish Nishant
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #33

                  Synaptrik wrote:

                  There is no reasoning with a person bent on fomenting argument.

                  Uhm do you mean me, or Oakman, or both of us?

                  Regards, Nish


                  Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
                  My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Nish Nishant

                    Synaptrik wrote:

                    There is no reasoning with a person bent on fomenting argument.

                    Uhm do you mean me, or Oakman, or both of us?

                    Regards, Nish


                    Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
                    My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Synaptrik
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #34

                    Oak. He seems to be a bit pedantic and attacking persons instead of issues of late. But, I'm free to post since he's used Diego's script to block me. :laugh:

                    This statement is false

                    N 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Synaptrik

                      Oak. He seems to be a bit pedantic and attacking persons instead of issues of late. But, I'm free to post since he's used Diego's script to block me. :laugh:

                      This statement is false

                      N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Nish Nishant
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #35

                      Synaptrik wrote:

                      Oak. He seems to be a bit pedantic and attacking persons instead of issues of late. But, I'm free to post since he's used Diego's script to block me.

                      Ah ok, thanks for the clarification.

                      Regards, Nish


                      Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
                      My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups