Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. "I am a most unhappy man..." - Quote by Woodrow Wilson

"I am a most unhappy man..." - Quote by Woodrow Wilson

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comquestion
37 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C CaptainSeeSharp

    Stan Shannon wrote:

    you want drug addicts protected, cared for, given health care,

    No i dont' What I want is people to stop controlling other people because they think they know whats better for them. If I want to smoke a joint, then goddammit I will smoke a joint, regardless of the law.

    Wake Up Call[^]

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Stan Shannon
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

    No i dont' What I want is people to stop controlling other people because they think they know whats better for them. If I want to smoke a joint, then goddammit I will smoke a joint, regardless of the law.

    No, its because I know whats better for me and my community. And limiting drug abuse is pretty much at the top of the list.

    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

    O 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Stan Shannon

      Oakman wrote:

      Most of us don't like dictatorships enforcing shari'a law. .

      Yes, you've made that point many times - the United States was historically indistinquishable from fundamentalist muslim nations.

      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

      O Offline
      O Offline
      Oakman
      wrote on last edited by
      #29

      Stan Shannon wrote:

      the United States was historically indistinquishable from fundamentalist muslim nations.

      Stop hiding behind lady liberty's skirts. Your fantasies of what the U.S. was like 200 years ago aside, it is clear you want a dictatorship of the majority - just so long as you get to pick the majority. Why pretend you espouse personal freedom when you have proved over and over again that you don't? Your list of what will be forbidden and what will be compulsory, once you and yours take over, grows daily.

      Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Stan Shannon

        CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

        No i dont' What I want is people to stop controlling other people because they think they know whats better for them. If I want to smoke a joint, then goddammit I will smoke a joint, regardless of the law.

        No, its because I know whats better for me and my community. And limiting drug abuse is pretty much at the top of the list.

        Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

        O Offline
        O Offline
        Oakman
        wrote on last edited by
        #30

        Stan Shannon wrote:

        And limiting drug abuse is pretty much at the top of the list.

        I thought you were okay with Limbaugh?

        Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • O Oakman

          Stan Shannon wrote:

          the United States was historically indistinquishable from fundamentalist muslim nations.

          Stop hiding behind lady liberty's skirts. Your fantasies of what the U.S. was like 200 years ago aside, it is clear you want a dictatorship of the majority - just so long as you get to pick the majority. Why pretend you espouse personal freedom when you have proved over and over again that you don't? Your list of what will be forbidden and what will be compulsory, once you and yours take over, grows daily.

          Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Stan Shannon
          wrote on last edited by
          #31

          Oakman wrote:

          Your fantasies of what the U.S. was like 200 years ago aside, it is clear you want a dictatorship of the majority - just so long as you get to pick the majority. Why pretend you espouse personal freedom when you have proved over and over again that you don't? Your list of what will be forbidden and what will be compulsory, once you and yours take over, grows daily.

          I've never even remotely expressed any such beliefs. You simply cannot deal with the reality of this nation's history and how it was intentionally designed to work. Like all libertarians, you want a society capable of enforcing your beliefs from the top down. I believe that what ever principles define a civilizatoin should rise from the bottom up. You are simply afraid of the common people haveing the kind of power the constitution originally provided them with.

          Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

          O 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Stan Shannon

            Oakman wrote:

            Your fantasies of what the U.S. was like 200 years ago aside, it is clear you want a dictatorship of the majority - just so long as you get to pick the majority. Why pretend you espouse personal freedom when you have proved over and over again that you don't? Your list of what will be forbidden and what will be compulsory, once you and yours take over, grows daily.

            I've never even remotely expressed any such beliefs. You simply cannot deal with the reality of this nation's history and how it was intentionally designed to work. Like all libertarians, you want a society capable of enforcing your beliefs from the top down. I believe that what ever principles define a civilizatoin should rise from the bottom up. You are simply afraid of the common people haveing the kind of power the constitution originally provided them with.

            Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

            O Offline
            O Offline
            Oakman
            wrote on last edited by
            #32

            G'bye, Stan. It's been fun sometimes, but you've gone off the deep end and I am sick of your bullshit. You've been plonked.

            Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

            S 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O Oakman

              Stan Shannon wrote:

              And limiting drug abuse is pretty much at the top of the list.

              I thought you were okay with Limbaugh?

              Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stan Shannon
              wrote on last edited by
              #33

              Oakman wrote:

              I thought you were okay with Limbaugh?

              I'm perfectly ok with Limbaugh. Why do you ask?

              Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • O Oakman

                G'bye, Stan. It's been fun sometimes, but you've gone off the deep end and I am sick of your bullshit. You've been plonked.

                Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

                S Offline
                S Offline
                Stan Shannon
                wrote on last edited by
                #34

                Oakman wrote:

                G'bye, Stan. It's been fun sometimes, but you've gone off the deep end and I am sick of your bullsh*t. You've been plonked.

                I'll accept that as an admission of defeat.

                Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O Oakman

                  Mustafa Ismail Mustafa wrote:

                  I thought you'd know (or at least guess) I had an interest in a zillion things

                  In a sense I did, but so much of our conversation has been a debate over one issue, it's easy to forget the whole man. Although there's no similarity except in the name, have you read Huxley's The Devils of Loudon? I played a small backstage role in the B-way production of the adaptation. Of course, the play was called simply, "The Devils." No use scaring people off thinking they'd have to know something about France.

                  Mustafa Ismail Mustafa wrote:

                  has a serious passion for the Elizabethan era.

                  I've directed or acted in about 2/3rds of the Shakespeare Canon, and think I've read most of his contmporaries's works, as well.

                  Mustafa Ismail Mustafa wrote:

                  What saddens me is that all the "leaders" are so selfish that they'd happily stand on the bodies of their people rather than pave the way for them.

                  That certainly doesn't hold true just for the Arabic world. The number of 'statesmen' 'reverends' and talk-show 'hosts' who favorite topic is "Let's you and him fight" is legion.

                  Jon Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface Both democrats and republicans are playing for the same team and it's not us. - Chris Austin

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mustafa Ismail Mustafa
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #35

                  Oakman wrote:

                  it's easy to forget the whole man.

                  Quite true and many times have I fallen for that!

                  Oakman wrote:

                  have you read Huxley's The Devils of Loudon?

                  No I haven't, but I'll see if the mediocre (at best) literary collection provided by the local bookstores in Amman has him. My library is looking for new members :)

                  Oakman wrote:

                  I played a small backstage role in the B-way production of the adaptation.

                  I used to do acting before 3rd year Undergrad work got in the way. I liked acting, and I was supposedly good at it.

                  Oakman wrote:

                  I've directed or acted in about 2/3rds of the Shakespeare Canon, and think I've read most of his contmporaries's works, as well.

                  I'm impressed. I'm not too interested in Shakespeare, though A midsummer night's dream, Hamlet, Macbeth, The Tempest and Othello (I was Iago) and his sonnets will hold a special place forever as both loved and hated (took them in school) I'm not too keen on that literary time, Cervantes being an exception.

                  Oakman wrote:

                  That certainly doesn't hold true just for the Arabic world. The number of 'statesmen' 'reverends' and talk-show 'hosts' who favorite topic is "Let's you and him fight" is legion.

                  Yeah, I know, but its the single biggest hurdle that needs to be surmounted these days. That and the bleating like sheep mentality along with the "its not our fault!" ideology that seems to permeate (again, not just in the Arab world).

                  If the post was helpful, please vote! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Stan Shannon

                    Oakman wrote:

                    I thought you were okay with Limbaugh?

                    I'm perfectly ok with Limbaugh. Why do you ask?

                    Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Synaptrik
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #36

                    *cough* because he's a drug addict *cough*

                    This statement is false

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Synaptrik

                      *cough* because he's a drug addict *cough*

                      This statement is false

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Stan Shannon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #37

                      Synaptrik wrote:

                      *cough* because he's a drug addict *cough*

                      No, actually, he isn't.

                      Chaining ourselves to the moral high ground does not make us good guys. Aside from making us easy targets, it merely makes us idiotic prisoners of our own self loathing.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups