SA vs India - getting tight!
-
Whoohoo, now this is getting too tense. We had it, and 3 overs later we are fighting for it. O yes , I'm talking about the cricket. I must say the catch that got Rhodes out was excellent, best I have seen in a long time. Its just a pity about the bowler. Does every nation in the subcontinent have a "thrower" in there team nowadays? May the best team win! Ya right! GO SOUTH AFRICA!!!:laugh: Give them a chance! Do it for the kittens, dear God, the kittens!
-
Whoohoo, now this is getting too tense. We had it, and 3 overs later we are fighting for it. O yes , I'm talking about the cricket. I must say the catch that got Rhodes out was excellent, best I have seen in a long time. Its just a pity about the bowler. Does every nation in the subcontinent have a "thrower" in there team nowadays? May the best team win! Ya right! GO SOUTH AFRICA!!!:laugh: Give them a chance! Do it for the kittens, dear God, the kittens!
Ditto!!! :cool: The following statement about your geekness is true.
The previous statement about your geekness is false. -
Whoohoo, now this is getting too tense. We had it, and 3 overs later we are fighting for it. O yes , I'm talking about the cricket. I must say the catch that got Rhodes out was excellent, best I have seen in a long time. Its just a pity about the bowler. Does every nation in the subcontinent have a "thrower" in there team nowadays? May the best team win! Ya right! GO SOUTH AFRICA!!!:laugh: Give them a chance! Do it for the kittens, dear God, the kittens!
leppie wrote: Its just a pity about the bowler. Does every nation in the subcontinent have a "thrower" in there team nowadays? Just curious, how do you define a good bowler or a bowler who is not a 'thrower'. I feel this is something subjective 'cause different people have different opinions. Anyway now we know the end result ..... :-D Kannan
-
leppie wrote: Its just a pity about the bowler. Does every nation in the subcontinent have a "thrower" in there team nowadays? Just curious, how do you define a good bowler or a bowler who is not a 'thrower'. I feel this is something subjective 'cause different people have different opinions. Anyway now we know the end result ..... :-D Kannan
Kannan Kalyanaraman wrote: Just curious, how do you define a good bowler or a bowler who is not a 'thrower'. I feel this is something subjective 'cause different people have different opinions. Just look at Mulirathalin (ok I dont know how to spell it), he "claims" to have an arm that cannot medically straiten. Now a thrower is some one that bowls with a non-strait arm, as that one bowler (with the stocking over his head). You can clearly see his arm bends during the bowling action. That is considered throwing! And not allowed! On the other hand, my TV's picture mite be warped, but I doubt it:laugh: In the end no loss, us SA'cans are used to losing. At least it wasnt against Aus! Give them a chance! Do it for the kittens, dear God, the kittens! As seen on MS File Transfer: Please enter an integer between 1 and 2.