History Channel Documentary Validates Chemtrails and Weather Warfare
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
There is a relatively modest of money and effort being invested in trying to lessen the effects of natural disasters with varying degrees of success. That includes cloud seeding to lessen the effects of drought.
It can also be used in warfare, global warfare. It can kill billions just as easily as it can save them. The people who can control the weather can control the world. You've seen how they screwed the global economy to get even more money and control, at least the informed readers have.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
I believe that abortion is a valid medical procedure.
Abortion is a form of eugenics.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
It can also be used in warfare, global warfare
In theory, I suppose it could.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
It can kill billions just as easily as it can save them.
It cannot easily kill OR save them. You'd never be able to match the devastation or degree of control offered by a nuclear bomb. I know you don't know what chaos theory is, but it goes a way explaining why making a thunderstorm in Afghanistan is an absurd idea.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Abortion is a form of eugenics.
Uh, no it isn't. It would need to be selective to be a form of Eugenics.
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
What do you mean?
Do you believe in his gospel that he spews all over the planet? He is the one who kick started the global warming fraud. He is or was the leader that the whole world recognizes as the global warming guy.
There's no doubt that humans are having an effect on global climate. The question is just what that effect ultimately will be.
-
There's no doubt that humans are having an effect on global climate. The question is just what that effect ultimately will be.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
There's no doubt that humans are having an effect on global climate.
I agree that pesticides and other toxic chemicals can wreck the environment, but carbon is part of the natural life cycle. They go after life by controlling and taxing it (Cap & Trade) is an good example of the tyranny that results from the fraudulent science. One organism's emissions is another organism's life source, which its emissions are our and other animal's life source. The sun has far more impact. If you don't already know, the sun's output level is not a constant. The sun is the source of all our weather.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
It can also be used in warfare, global warfare
In theory, I suppose it could.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
It can kill billions just as easily as it can save them.
It cannot easily kill OR save them. You'd never be able to match the devastation or degree of control offered by a nuclear bomb. I know you don't know what chaos theory is, but it goes a way explaining why making a thunderstorm in Afghanistan is an absurd idea.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Abortion is a form of eugenics.
Uh, no it isn't. It would need to be selective to be a form of Eugenics.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
You'd never be able to match the devastation or degree of control offered by a nuclear bomb.
Well, think of it this way. You have a large ant colony in your lab, you want to irradiate eradicate them. Well if you beat up their colony they will attack you, but if you freeze them they will die uneventful and you will have their colony and its undamaged infrastructure to yourself.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
It would need to be selective to be a form of Eugenics.
What groups of people women get the most abortions? Hint: Only 1% are performed because of rape or incest.
Fine words from a gentleman.[^]
modified on Saturday, July 25, 2009 1:01 PM
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
You'd never be able to match the devastation or degree of control offered by a nuclear bomb.
Well, think of it this way. You have a large ant colony in your lab, you want to irradiate eradicate them. Well if you beat up their colony they will attack you, but if you freeze them they will die uneventful and you will have their colony and its undamaged infrastructure to yourself.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
It would need to be selective to be a form of Eugenics.
What groups of people women get the most abortions? Hint: Only 1% are performed because of rape or incest.
Fine words from a gentleman.[^]
modified on Saturday, July 25, 2009 1:01 PM
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Well, think of it this way. You have a large ant colony in your lab, you want to irradiate them. Well if you beat up their colony they will attack you, but if you freeze them they will die uneventful and you will have their colony and its undamaged infrastructure to yourself.
Do you even know what 'irradiate' means? If I wanted to irradiate them, I'd use radiation. And what makes you think tornadoes, tropical cyclones, earthquakes, or tsunami will leave your enemy's infrastructure 'undamaged'?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
What groups of people get the most abortions? Hint: Only 1% are performed because of rape or incest.
Uhh...women?
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Well, think of it this way. You have a large ant colony in your lab, you want to irradiate them. Well if you beat up their colony they will attack you, but if you freeze them they will die uneventful and you will have their colony and its undamaged infrastructure to yourself.
Do you even know what 'irradiate' means? If I wanted to irradiate them, I'd use radiation. And what makes you think tornadoes, tropical cyclones, earthquakes, or tsunami will leave your enemy's infrastructure 'undamaged'?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
What groups of people get the most abortions? Hint: Only 1% are performed because of rape or incest.
Uhh...women?
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Do you even know what 'irradiate' means
I meant eradicate.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Uhh...women?
Ok smart ass, dig down a little further into the statistics.
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Do you even know what 'irradiate' means
I meant eradicate.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Uhh...women?
Ok smart ass, dig down a little further into the statistics.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
dig down a little further into the statistics.
Why don't you do it. I'm not going to expend effort trying to prove your arguments for you.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Well, think of it this way. You have a large ant colony in your lab, you want to irradiate them. Well if you beat up their colony they will attack you, but if you freeze them they will die uneventful and you will have their colony and its undamaged infrastructure to yourself.
Do you even know what 'irradiate' means? If I wanted to irradiate them, I'd use radiation. And what makes you think tornadoes, tropical cyclones, earthquakes, or tsunami will leave your enemy's infrastructure 'undamaged'?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
What groups of people get the most abortions? Hint: Only 1% are performed because of rape or incest.
Uhh...women?
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Uhh...women?
:laugh: He walked right into that one.
Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit The men said to them, "Why do you seek the living One among the dead? He is not here, but He has risen." Me blog, You read
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
dig down a little further into the statistics.
Why don't you do it. I'm not going to expend effort trying to prove your arguments for you.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Why don't you do it. I'm not going to expend effort trying to prove your arguments for you.
I already have, you need to do it yourself. I will tell you that the groups that receive the most abortions in the world are what eugenicist call "undesirables".
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Why don't you do it. I'm not going to expend effort trying to prove your arguments for you.
I already have, you need to do it yourself. I will tell you that the groups that receive the most abortions in the world are what eugenicist call "undesirables".
It doesn't surprise me that you don't understand the fundamentals of debating. You have to collect evidence to support your arguments, and then present your evidence, and then defend its veracity. I'm going to bed, and I expect some reliable demographics that authenticates your thus far farcical ramblings when I wake up.
-
It doesn't surprise me that you don't understand the fundamentals of debating. You have to collect evidence to support your arguments, and then present your evidence, and then defend its veracity. I'm going to bed, and I expect some reliable demographics that authenticates your thus far farcical ramblings when I wake up.
Well, first I want your honest opinion on what groups of women you think receive the largest percentage of abortions.
-
I believe in, and have experienced, secret mind control. OK, it was only secret until my mind was controlled, but my point is that it is very real. I just don't believe the one world government is doing it on a global scale.
Brady Kelly wrote:
I believe in, and have experienced, secret mind control. OK, it was only secret until my mind was controlled, but my point is that it is very real.
I'd like to know more about your experience.
-
Brady Kelly wrote:
I believe in, and have experienced, secret mind control. OK, it was only secret until my mind was controlled, but my point is that it is very real.
I'd like to know more about your experience.
When I started practising ceremonial magic, I became aware of influences far above Earth. When your commit controlling your own mind[1], you quickly and dangerously discover how easy it is to control. From that realisation the mental hospital is only a threat for the first two years.
-
When I started practising ceremonial magic, I became aware of influences far above Earth. When your commit controlling your own mind[1], you quickly and dangerously discover how easy it is to control. From that realisation the mental hospital is only a threat for the first two years.
That seems a bit far out to me. :~ I was thinking about mind control along the lines of propaganda (though media and educational institutions), financial manipulation, nutrition and pharmaceutical intake, and social influences.
-
That seems a bit far out to me. :~ I was thinking about mind control along the lines of propaganda (though media and educational institutions), financial manipulation, nutrition and pharmaceutical intake, and social influences.
Hence one should only attempt higher ceremonial magic after a full year of practicing the Banishing Ritual of the Pentagram[^].
-
A ten minute clip of a History Channel Documentary validating chemtrails and weather warfare. Its time that the sheep like Ravel and Graus wake up out of their deep slumber of denial and delusion. Though they are socialist eugenicists, so they may love chemtrails.[^] I could see the governments using weather warfare to make global warming real. Sabotaging the planets atmosphere so they can prove Al Gore is right and we all need to be enslaved and disposed of to save the planet. As power madmen always do, they create a problem in disguise, then offer a solution so they can be the saviors. For you stupid fucking piece of shit jackasses who want to squeal out "tin-foil" like you were just shafted up the ass with Al Gore's foot, here is more proof from USA Today that Bill Gates has a plan and the money to build a system to control hurricanes.[^] PS: Number One from Star Trek TNG is hosting it.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Its time that the sheep like Ravel and Graus wake up out of their deep slumber of denial and delusion. Though they are socialist eugenicists, so they may love chemtrails.[^]
Why is it that you have to insult me by name, every time, even though when I engage you, you ignore every point I raise in discussion, and then run crying like a baby when the pressure of being proven wrong and clueless proves too much ? Last time you disappeared for over 24 hours, why invite that sort of public shaming on yourself again ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
He wants to stop hurricanes from killing so many people? The bastard!
Ok, so Bill Gates applied for patents for his hurricane manipulation system which is all over the news, and you still deny weather control. The documentary clip also mentioned cloud seeding using chemtrails of silver iodide.[^]
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
I find it rather entertaining that you would call me a 'eugenicist' - any proof that I am?
You said you believe in abortion and population control. Also you are a proponent of socialized healthcare, which involves rationing by deciding who is more valuable in society, but that is for another thread.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
New World Order
Aside from all that other gibberish you mixed in with that to debase it, the New World Order is out in the open now. Bilderburg attendies are actually saying to questioners that Yes, I am part of Builderburg, world leaders get together and cooperate to make decisions that have influence around the world.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Also you are a proponent of socialized healthcare, which involves rationing by deciding who is more valuable in society, but that is for another thread.
You are such an idiot. What amuses me, is that people like you, people who are worthless to society, are exactly the people most likely to benefit from socialised health care.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Well, first I want your honest opinion on what groups of women you think receive the largest percentage of abortions.
Here's a thought, moron. Is it the lower levels of the socio-economic system that have more abortions ? Probably. Because it's people like you who are too dumb to use a condom ( well, people as smart as you, but who are able to attract a mate ). So what ? It's only what you claim it is, if they are being forced.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Here's a thought, moron. Is it the lower levels of the socio-economic system that have more abortions ? Probably. Because it's people like you who are too dumb to use a condom ( well, people as smart as you, but who are able to attract a mate ). So what ? It's only what you claim it is, if they are being forced.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Christian Graus wrote:
It's only what you claim it is, if they are being forced.
No, that is not true Eugene. From Wikipedia: There are three main ways by which the methods of eugenics can be applied. One is mandatory eugenics or authoritarian eugenics, in which the government mandates a eugenics program. Policies and/or legislation is often seen as being coercive and restrictive. Another is promotional voluntary eugenics, in which eugenics is voluntarily practiced and promoted to the general population, but not officially mandated. This is a form of non-state enforced eugenics, using a liberal or democratic approach, which can mostly be seen in the 1900s. The third is private eugenics, which is practiced voluntarily by individuals and groups, but not promoted to the general population.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Its time that the sheep like Ravel and Graus wake up out of their deep slumber of denial and delusion. Though they are socialist eugenicists, so they may love chemtrails.[^]
Why is it that you have to insult me by name, every time, even though when I engage you, you ignore every point I raise in discussion, and then run crying like a baby when the pressure of being proven wrong and clueless proves too much ? Last time you disappeared for over 24 hours, why invite that sort of public shaming on yourself again ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Christian Graus wrote:
you ignore every point I raise in discussion
Such as, people should give up their liberties for freedom, less is more, and weakness is strength. You may not like such simplifications but those are the points you raise and they are absurd. I'm sure you will respond by saying that I don't have rights because I am of no value as a resource and that I need to be sterilized and medicated to keep me complacent, compliant, and mostly deactivated.