Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment
-
John P Holdren (Obama's Chief Science and Technology Adviser) coauthored the book Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment Here is some excerpts from that book. Page 837: Compulsory abortions would be legal “Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.” Page 786: Single mothers should have their babies taken away by the government; or they could be forced to have abortions “One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.” Page 787-8: Mass sterilization of humans though drugs in the water supply is OK as long as it doesn’t harm livestock “Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.” Page 786-7: The government could control women’s reproduction by either sterilizing them or implanting mandatory long-term birth control Involuntary fertility control “A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of
-
John P Holdren (Obama's Chief Science and Technology Adviser) coauthored the book Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment Here is some excerpts from that book. Page 837: Compulsory abortions would be legal “Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.” Page 786: Single mothers should have their babies taken away by the government; or they could be forced to have abortions “One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.” Page 787-8: Mass sterilization of humans though drugs in the water supply is OK as long as it doesn’t harm livestock “Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.” Page 786-7: The government could control women’s reproduction by either sterilizing them or implanting mandatory long-term birth control Involuntary fertility control “A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of
The issue is that not everyone who talks about some sort of population control, agrees with this guy.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
John P Holdren (Obama's Chief Science and Technology Adviser) coauthored the book Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment Here is some excerpts from that book. Page 837: Compulsory abortions would be legal “Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.” Page 786: Single mothers should have their babies taken away by the government; or they could be forced to have abortions “One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.” Page 787-8: Mass sterilization of humans though drugs in the water supply is OK as long as it doesn’t harm livestock “Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.” Page 786-7: The government could control women’s reproduction by either sterilizing them or implanting mandatory long-term birth control Involuntary fertility control “A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex
Well then, as long as we have both males and females in society, we're safe.
-
John P Holdren (Obama's Chief Science and Technology Adviser) coauthored the book Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment Here is some excerpts from that book. Page 837: Compulsory abortions would be legal “Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.” Page 786: Single mothers should have their babies taken away by the government; or they could be forced to have abortions “One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.” Page 787-8: Mass sterilization of humans though drugs in the water supply is OK as long as it doesn’t harm livestock “Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.” Page 786-7: The government could control women’s reproduction by either sterilizing them or implanting mandatory long-term birth control Involuntary fertility control “A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of
Did you finally find a copy of this book or did get these quotes from some where else?
-
Did you finally find a copy of this book or did get these quotes from some where else?
I have a scanned copy in PDF form. Its real and its even all over mainstream media. John P Holdren was even confronted about it. He said he wrote that a long time ago so people shouldn't judge him by what he wrote. You would have to be a fool to trust him, but there is an over abundance of fools these days.
-
I have a scanned copy in PDF form. Its real and its even all over mainstream media. John P Holdren was even confronted about it. He said he wrote that a long time ago so people shouldn't judge him by what he wrote. You would have to be a fool to trust him, but there is an over abundance of fools these days.