The new Swine flu vaccine linked to killer nerve disease
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
This is just speculation
Really ? I'd never have guessed. Perhaps you should say 'paranoid drug crazed speculation' ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
This is just speculation, but these injections could play a major role in population reduction, especially since it is a world-wide program and is the only way that there can be precision control over the deaths of hundreds of millions or billions.
I don't think They would be so non-selective of who dies in a mass population reduction. The want the poor and ignorant, the unemployed and illegal, people gone, not everyone.
mmm interesting thought, the ignorant are more likely to belives css's rubbish sand therefore rejecting the jab - so will be more vunreable than those that have it.... thats it!!! CSS is the govenment he is trying to convince the gulible to leave themselves open to the flu - oh what a cunning plan Mr O, let those with the worst healthcare be the most vunreable to the bug - 2 birds one stone - illiminate the poor/unhealthy and in the process create a wonderful case for health reform
Go away and research the subject, anaylse the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.
-
Josh Gray wrote:
In what time frame do you expect this to happen?
Quickly. Some people may get cancer at a later date. http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/bild-english/world-news/2009/08/07/swine-flu-health-expert-warning/does-virus-vaccine-increase-risk-of-cancer.html[^] Its a known fact that population reduction is a goal of the ruling elite, and the slaves have been conditioned to believe that there are too many people. This is something you have to take into consideration when you line up to take your shots. This is just speculation, but these injections could play a major role in population reduction, especially since it is a world-wide program and is the only way that there can be precision control over the deaths of hundreds of millions or billions. Again, it is possible, and we know that we are ruled by ruthless sociopathic thieves, why the hell would anyone trust these dirtbags when it comes to injections of their creation into us?
Josh Gray wrote:
What will you think if after this period of time if your predictions are not proven correct?
Well, I don't think that the vaccines are going to do any good, and I am sure that people are going to be adversely effected by it. You would have to be very simple minded to believe that this whole H1N1 thing is not going to be the new 9/11 or what have you.
ok take a few facts 1, the death rate from reaction to the jab (based on the 70s epidemic although with better healthcare/knowledge etc this number should be lower) was about 1 in 750,000 2, the current death rate due to swine flu is approx 1 in 450,000 although this is expected to rise durring the prime flu months (predictions vary between 1 in 5,000 to 1 in 200,000 or 1 in 1,500,000 with the jab) so you are happy to risk (and get others to risk) a higher chance of death by not having the jab - yes there is a risk (so is crossing the road) but its lower than not having the jab oh - and yes the death rate in the 70s was higher due to reaction to the jab than by the flu itself but how many would have died if they had not been vaccinated?
Go away and research the subject, anaylse the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.
-
mmm interesting thought, the ignorant are more likely to belives css's rubbish sand therefore rejecting the jab - so will be more vunreable than those that have it.... thats it!!! CSS is the govenment he is trying to convince the gulible to leave themselves open to the flu - oh what a cunning plan Mr O, let those with the worst healthcare be the most vunreable to the bug - 2 birds one stone - illiminate the poor/unhealthy and in the process create a wonderful case for health reform
Go away and research the subject, anaylse the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.
-
Josh Gray wrote:
In what time frame do you expect this to happen?
Quickly. Some people may get cancer at a later date. http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/bild-english/world-news/2009/08/07/swine-flu-health-expert-warning/does-virus-vaccine-increase-risk-of-cancer.html[^] Its a known fact that population reduction is a goal of the ruling elite, and the slaves have been conditioned to believe that there are too many people. This is something you have to take into consideration when you line up to take your shots. This is just speculation, but these injections could play a major role in population reduction, especially since it is a world-wide program and is the only way that there can be precision control over the deaths of hundreds of millions or billions. Again, it is possible, and we know that we are ruled by ruthless sociopathic thieves, why the hell would anyone trust these dirtbags when it comes to injections of their creation into us?
Josh Gray wrote:
What will you think if after this period of time if your predictions are not proven correct?
Well, I don't think that the vaccines are going to do any good, and I am sure that people are going to be adversely effected by it. You would have to be very simple minded to believe that this whole H1N1 thing is not going to be the new 9/11 or what have you.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
This is just speculation, but these injections could play a major role in population reduction, especially since it is a world-wide program and is the only way that there can be precision control over the deaths of hundreds of millions or billions. Again, it is possible, and we know that we are ruled by ruthless sociopathic thieves, why the hell would anyone trust these dirtbags when it comes to injections of their creation into us?
That would be a remarkably stupid way of administering population control. You are aware that vaccine use is positively correlated with wealth and education, correct? If anything it would make more sense to release a slow-acting poison into the general population and place the cure in vaccines. Thus eliminating not only the ultra-poor but also individuals who know the "Truth" such as yourself. *Now we watch as his little conspiracy theorist mind explodes*
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
This is just speculation, but these injections could play a major role in population reduction, especially since it is a world-wide program and is the only way that there can be precision control over the deaths of hundreds of millions or billions. Again, it is possible, and we know that we are ruled by ruthless sociopathic thieves, why the hell would anyone trust these dirtbags when it comes to injections of their creation into us?
That would be a remarkably stupid way of administering population control. You are aware that vaccine use is positively correlated with wealth and education, correct? If anything it would make more sense to release a slow-acting poison into the general population and place the cure in vaccines. Thus eliminating not only the ultra-poor but also individuals who know the "Truth" such as yourself. *Now we watch as his little conspiracy theorist mind explodes*
I think the most effective way of eliminating certain groups of people or to wipe out certain regions without using force is to make as many people as possible think that they desperately need injections. The flagged people, race, region, or political group would receive a special injection that would kill or permanently damage that person in a matter of time.
-
I think the most effective way of eliminating certain groups of people or to wipe out certain regions without using force is to make as many people as possible think that they desperately need injections. The flagged people, race, region, or political group would receive a special injection that would kill or permanently damage that person in a matter of time.
You your saying that the flu is a myth? You dont think that the govenment is more likely reacting to an actual infection by showing thats its not doing nothing? govenments lose power onthings like allowing large number of deaths without at least showing thet it did something to prevent them. would it not be more effective to allow the flu (or even release the thing) to get established and then give those "groups" you mention a plecebo after all you can then say "well we tried, but for some reason the vaccine was ineffective to these groups" and blame it on lifestyle - genetics - shampoo or anything you please.... afterall it is a "fact" that flu killed many more than did the two world wars
Go away and research the subject, anaylse the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.
-
You your saying that the flu is a myth? You dont think that the govenment is more likely reacting to an actual infection by showing thats its not doing nothing? govenments lose power onthings like allowing large number of deaths without at least showing thet it did something to prevent them. would it not be more effective to allow the flu (or even release the thing) to get established and then give those "groups" you mention a plecebo after all you can then say "well we tried, but for some reason the vaccine was ineffective to these groups" and blame it on lifestyle - genetics - shampoo or anything you please.... afterall it is a "fact" that flu killed many more than did the two world wars
Go away and research the subject, anaylse the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.
Alex hogarth wrote:
would it not be more effective to allow the flu (or even release the thing) to get established and then give those "groups" you mention a plecebo after all you can then say "well we tried, but for some reason the vaccine was ineffective to these groups" and blame it on lifestyle - genetics - shampoo or anything you please....
Well that is certainly possible, but I don't think that this new flu is going to be any more dangerous than the regular flu. Lets get back to the pure facts, the vaccine is dangerous and so are the greedy power-mad psychos that want to inject us.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
This is just speculation, but these injections could play a major role in population reduction, especially since it is a world-wide program and is the only way that there can be precision control over the deaths of hundreds of millions or billions. Again, it is possible, and we know that we are ruled by ruthless sociopathic thieves, why the hell would anyone trust these dirtbags when it comes to injections of their creation into us?
That would be a remarkably stupid way of administering population control. You are aware that vaccine use is positively correlated with wealth and education, correct? If anything it would make more sense to release a slow-acting poison into the general population and place the cure in vaccines. Thus eliminating not only the ultra-poor but also individuals who know the "Truth" such as yourself. *Now we watch as his little conspiracy theorist mind explodes*
Sorry missed your post and posted a very similar answer, but yours is even more effective as you can also target indivuals as well as groups etc I have had a word with our lizard overlords and they will consider this for the next cull. One way of making sure we get CSS is to coat the tinfoil he uses for protection from our survailance satelites (does he not realise that the lack of signal from his anal implant gives him away)
Go away and research the subject, anaylse the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.
-
Alex hogarth wrote:
would it not be more effective to allow the flu (or even release the thing) to get established and then give those "groups" you mention a plecebo after all you can then say "well we tried, but for some reason the vaccine was ineffective to these groups" and blame it on lifestyle - genetics - shampoo or anything you please....
Well that is certainly possible, but I don't think that this new flu is going to be any more dangerous than the regular flu. Lets get back to the pure facts, the vaccine is dangerous and so are the greedy power-mad psychos that want to inject us.
the facts are that the vaccine is less dangerous than the virus, and the greedy power mad psychos have far better things to be doing than worrying about the starving masses as these are irrelivant in the big picture, in fact the most succesful psychos actually find that these masses are a better bet for keeping power than an educated classes, and whats more you dont need any of the far fetched conspriancies you proport ps you think? you think its not going to be more dangerous????? you want the world to base its reaction to a flu epidemic based on what an ignoramous like you thinks - what if your wrong and 10% of the world population dies?
Go away and research the subject, anaylse the options for and against, understand the problem and them come back when you agree with me.