Population control in general
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
Nobody said that.
I am not so stupid as to fall for little mind games. When you spout out pure hatred towards your fellow man of all races and religions as you are saying that there needs to be population controls that only permit the "smart" people to breed through tyrannic totalitarian controls it becomes pretty evident whats going on inside that sick little head. Anyone who is a proponent of population controls declares himself to be the enemy of 95% of the rest of the world. They think they are better than everyone else and are the only ones who deserve to live normal lives, they are delusional.
You're putting words into people's mouths. Again. Hardly surprising.
-
You're putting words into people's mouths. Again. Hardly surprising.
If he is so concerned about the government taking his paychecks and giving it to the welfare people he should rail against that. Little does he realize that welfare's real purpose is to degenerate society and get stupid people like him to go along with extremism. Its like warfare, its them against him and he wants to fight back to lower their numbers. Population control has long been the goal of the elitists and the only way they can accomplish that goal is to get people to go along with it. If you pay someone to sit on his ass, he will gladly sit on his ass, pay him to produce something, he will produce something. It is as simple as that. The Great Global Warming Swindle[^] With the purposely imploded economy (economic terrorism) you have many good men and women out of work, should they be sterilized? Its all controlled, we can all live good lives if we stop letting the central bankers and corrupt politicians deceive everyone and degenerate society. If you fall into the trap they set for you then you loose. You really need to start getting with the program, because there is a lot more going on behind the scenes than you realize. Its not a conspiracy theory, its fact and there is plenty of real evidence to back it up. If you want to learn (which I'm sure you don't) start with the central banks like the federal reserve. Learn about how they work, they are the root of most of our problems. The Money Masters - How International Bankers Gained Control of America[^] Again, that is not a conspiracy film, its pure documented fact.
modified on Saturday, August 29, 2009 12:06 PM
-
If he is so concerned about the government taking his paychecks and giving it to the welfare people he should rail against that. Little does he realize that welfare's real purpose is to degenerate society and get stupid people like him to go along with extremism. Its like warfare, its them against him and he wants to fight back to lower their numbers. Population control has long been the goal of the elitists and the only way they can accomplish that goal is to get people to go along with it. If you pay someone to sit on his ass, he will gladly sit on his ass, pay him to produce something, he will produce something. It is as simple as that. The Great Global Warming Swindle[^] With the purposely imploded economy (economic terrorism) you have many good men and women out of work, should they be sterilized? Its all controlled, we can all live good lives if we stop letting the central bankers and corrupt politicians deceive everyone and degenerate society. If you fall into the trap they set for you then you loose. You really need to start getting with the program, because there is a lot more going on behind the scenes than you realize. Its not a conspiracy theory, its fact and there is plenty of real evidence to back it up. If you want to learn (which I'm sure you don't) start with the central banks like the federal reserve. Learn about how they work, they are the root of most of our problems. The Money Masters - How International Bankers Gained Control of America[^] Again, that is not a conspiracy film, its pure documented fact.
modified on Saturday, August 29, 2009 12:06 PM
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
If you want to learn (which I'm sure you don't)
You've got that right. Learn to format your writing properly. It gives me a headache.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
If you want to learn (which I'm sure you don't)
You've got that right. Learn to format your writing properly. It gives me a headache.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
You are not very smart.
Says you.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
You are not very smart.
Says you.
You need to gain a wider perspective. You look at the world through a little pinpoint, I look at the world through a giant hole.
-
You need to gain a wider perspective. You look at the world through a little pinpoint, I look at the world through a giant hole.
You look at the world through YouTube. That's more like an anal fissure than anything.
-
You look at the world through YouTube. That's more like an anal fissure than anything.
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
You look at the world through YouTube. That's more like an anal fissure than anything.
I get most of my information from the most comprehensive living library in the world, the internet.
-
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
You look at the world through YouTube. That's more like an anal fissure than anything.
I get most of my information from the most comprehensive living library in the world, the internet.
OK, I concede: YouTube and that Alex Jones idiot. Wow, I'm impressed.
-
LunaticFringe wrote:
And just what color is the sky in this little utopia of yours?
A bit cloudy and damp. Hoping it dries out a bit so I can roller blade this afternoon.
LunaticFringe wrote:
In just the last week there were stories in all major news outlets about drowning polar bears, disappearing amphibians, a plastic sludge patch inthe middle of the Pacific the size of Texas...
I have to confess to being a late adopter. I bought, for the first time a 4 gig MP3 player. Listen to my music, down load and listen to content I like. No time for the news, I suspect it doesn't really change much.
kmg365 wrote:
I have to confess to being a late adopter. I bought, for the first time a 4 gig MP3 player. Listen to my music, down load and listen to content I like....
:) Seriously, though, you mention birds around your house as a positive sign that the environment is generally healthy. Avian monocultures of sparrows or pigeons do not denote a healthy environment. In some areas of North America, 90% of certain songbird species have disappeared. If you're really unaware of this, I suggest you do a little research on the subject. You might find things are a little less pristine than you thought.
-
OK, I concede: YouTube and that Alex Jones idiot. Wow, I'm impressed.
Perhaps this will spark something inside you. This is about Monstanto. If this doesn't concern you then you are malfunctioning, because NO ONE should EVER have a total monopoly on the world's food supply. The GMO seeds actually crossbreed with the organic variants which destroys them and there is nothing that can stop it. That eventually forces everyone to buy seed every year which will kill off the small farmers who feed their families off of their own farms. [^]
-
Perhaps this will spark something inside you. This is about Monstanto. If this doesn't concern you then you are malfunctioning, because NO ONE should EVER have a total monopoly on the world's food supply. The GMO seeds actually crossbreed with the organic variants which destroys them and there is nothing that can stop it. That eventually forces everyone to buy seed every year which will kill off the small farmers who feed their families off of their own farms. [^]
Goodnight boring person.
-
kmg365 wrote:
I have to confess to being a late adopter. I bought, for the first time a 4 gig MP3 player. Listen to my music, down load and listen to content I like....
:) Seriously, though, you mention birds around your house as a positive sign that the environment is generally healthy. Avian monocultures of sparrows or pigeons do not denote a healthy environment. In some areas of North America, 90% of certain songbird species have disappeared. If you're really unaware of this, I suggest you do a little research on the subject. You might find things are a little less pristine than you thought.
-
Since some on this board have found it favorable to control the population I thought it worthy of it's own thread. To start off the discussion a few questions came to mind. What methods of population control are ethical? How do you motivate people to control their breeding? Who decides what is an acceptable method for population control? Who gets to decide the number of people there should be? What role does human rights play into it? My responses: I would prefer simply a cap without any exceptions, except natural. Not going to jail would be a good one. I would rather have a law that prohibited more babies than a tax, because taxes are a class war tactic or igniter. Taxes that make it easier for some to have more of something than others only benefits the rich or better off. Science should be able to tell us this. Human rights in this are very tricky. Basically you have people telling people they can't have kids or as many. I'm not thrilled with this, and I would prefer voluntary reduction most of all. If you can't have kids adopt. There's no reason to make more babies when there are plenty looking for good homes and parents to raise them. This is where I expect some to say kids aren't a right and others to say the opposite or at least imply it.
wolfbinary wrote:
What methods of population control are ethical?
Removing financial incentives for the poor having more kids, which we pay for. By accepting that every child has a cost to society and the earth, and thus giving people the right to one child for free, a right they can sell and that others need to buy, to have more than one. Enforcing this by removal of rights in society, and not by force, for example, no right to free education, or services, or any sort of government handout, and an increase in taxes, if more than one is had without following the overall scheme.
wolfbinary wrote:
How do you motivate people to control their breeding
The same way we motivate people to breed a lot now. Money.
wolfbinary wrote:
Who gets to decide the number of people there should be?
That number is pretty much known. Less then we have now, which is achieved through one child per couple.
wolfbinary wrote:
What role does human rights play into it?
Do you mean the 'right' of a person to have 10 kids on welfare, or the right of living humans today to live in a world that can sustain them ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
It doesn't matter how you want it or what your opinion is, its happening as it is outlined in the document below. I encourage you to take the 10 minutes needed to read it, it isn't that difficult.
nothing is happening. You are a moron. A ton of unrelated quotes is not a conspiracy, or even a plan.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
We don't need population control. On inspection everything is fine. Neighbors are fine. People at church are fine, even cow-orkers are cool. Lots of trees around, grass, birds, I have foxes and deer roaming the back yard... Now don't get me wrong there are lots of annoying people about, but they will always be there no matter what the population is.
Is that your head I see buried in the sand ? Or is where you live completely self sufficient, growing it's own food, making it's own good, generating it's own power ? Unless you are Amish, this is ridiculous position to take.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
kmg365 wrote:
We don't need population control. On inspection everything is fine...
And just what color is the sky in this little utopia of yours? In just the last week there were stories in all major news outlets about drowning polar bears, disappearing amphibians, a plastic sludge patch inthe middle of the Pacific the size of Texas... Oh, but absolutely. No way there are too many people. I encourage everyone to breed like rabbits. Especially the stupid. Nothing like mushrooming numbers paired with diminishing cumulative IQ.
LunaticFringe wrote:
a plastic sludge patch inthe middle of the Pacific the size of Texas...
That's been there for a long time. It's just on the news now ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
nothing is happening. You are a moron. A ton of unrelated quotes is not a conspiracy, or even a plan.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
The sky is green right?
-
Is that your head I see buried in the sand ? Or is where you live completely self sufficient, growing it's own food, making it's own good, generating it's own power ? Unless you are Amish, this is ridiculous position to take.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Christian Graus wrote:
Is that your head I see buried in the sand ?
No its yours.
-
LunaticFringe wrote:
The fact is that there are more people on the earth than it can support.
I don't see any supporting evidence. Also, I would rather die of natural causes than suffer and die at the hand of evil men.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
I don't see any supporting evidence.
Because you are an ignorant fool. How can you spend so long online and know so little ?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Also, I would rather die of natural causes than suffer and die at the hand of evil men.
It's true that extinction due to overuse of resources is natural. It was happening to the Incas when the Spanish showed up. I wonder if they were glad to die 'naturally', or would have preferred to live ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.