Fall of the Republic
-
Fall of the Republic is a true documentary covering the fall of the republic. It is not a conspiracy film, I repeat, it is not a conspiracy film. Check out these two new trailers, the very first one is in my sig. This is truly hard-hitting. To get the widest possible audience, it will be available on youtube so this is not an advertisement. Two[^] Three[^][This one is the best]
modified on Thursday, October 8, 2009 2:04 PM
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Three[^][This one is the best]
Most people, still they think most entertainment to do with movies, drama, is for nothing more than their entertainment. It never was that case. And some will see meanings that the author never intended. Throughout our history, social engineers have refined techniques designed to control large populations. Not working well, are they? Given the reaction to Obama. Bringing entertainment to thousands of people, right in the comfort of our own home. You are actually in alpha states being completely downloaded with new ideas. As you are when engrossed in a book. A cult of personality can be manufactured to influence the masses. Reagan was the closest to a cult of personality. Hint: He had one. Obama? Surely they jest. (Liked the little green lines, trying to make him look as if he were computer generated - some time in the 80s) Nobody will question what he's doing, they will be too pre-occupied with where he is, and what he's wearing. Yes, noticed that. :rolleyes: The idea of making him into a celebrity. Making? Doesn't being #1 in the USA qualify as celebrity any more? Perhaps the Nobel Peace Prize for 'most promising newcomer' will help. Eventually, he said, they will expect the media to do all their thinking and reasoning for them, and that's happened today. Really? Well, Uncle Alex's social engineering appears to be effective in this respect. You are a shining example. The scientific dictatorship understands what makes people tick, and they're using it against us. Cue scary 'scientific' voice: "These cells are scanned by a stream of electrons, completing 30 pictures per second." :laugh: I cannot comment on the USA, but I just don't see a lot of difference in the behaviour of successive generations, except that the young now watch less television. It's hard for people 'like that' to take a serious interest in what their elected officials are doing, they've been programmed. 'Like that'! Well, I like that, and Obama is called elitist. It's Obama's role to front for the international banking syndicate. If you say so. How far back does all this go? Was Ike a puppet too? Barack Obama is a puppet of the New World Order. Now here you have a problem discriminating between 'new world order' which is merely descriptive of a major change in th
-
Bob Emmett wrote:
I'm retired, at home, and it's lunchtime.
Sorry, I'm confused surely
retired+lunchtime = pub? When I was unemployed resting, lunch often took four or five hours.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
Nagy Vilmos wrote:
retired+lunchtime = pub
I have to bus to anywhere decent, and it's chilly, I'd be sober by the time I got back. So, it's in house supping for me today.
Nagy Vilmos wrote:
When I was unemployed resting, lunch often took four or five hours.
Unemployment Resting benefit good in your neck of the woods? :)
Bob Emmett I solemnly declare that I do not wish the USA to be more like Britain, Canada, or Oz.
-
Nagy Vilmos wrote:
retired+lunchtime = pub
I have to bus to anywhere decent, and it's chilly, I'd be sober by the time I got back. So, it's in house supping for me today.
Nagy Vilmos wrote:
When I was unemployed resting, lunch often took four or five hours.
Unemployment Resting benefit good in your neck of the woods? :)
Bob Emmett I solemnly declare that I do not wish the USA to be more like Britain, Canada, or Oz.
Bob Emmett wrote:
Resting benefit good in your neck of the woods?
It was along time ago, I was living at home [low cost life] and I was given a lot of money to f-off quickly, so I did. Then I spent six months deciing what to do next. And having lunch.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
-
Christian Graus wrote:
The big trouble with conspiracy theorists is your
I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I only take what is documented fact.
Christian Graus wrote:
Yes, television is bad for people. Yes, it's used to deliver propaganda and advertising.
Yes, indeed it is.
Christian Graus wrote:
It works the same as the internet.
Not quite, the internet is more like a library. On the internet, people have absolute control over what information that they pull up.
Christian Graus wrote:
Because things are presented as fact, you assume they are.
Nonsense. This is simply an outlandishly inadequate claim. I don't assume facts, I actually look at the source and compare my findings with the information presented. The information presented is fully capable of withstanding an thorough investigation.
Christian Graus wrote:
you then assume that the presumptions these people bolt onto these facts
I am fully capable of identifying and understanding extrapolations, as well as forming my own.
Christian Graus wrote:
The best way to tell a lie, is to attach it to some truth and then parade the true part as proof that everything you said was accurate.
This is exactly what climate change is. I suggest you reexamine Fall of the Republic because you are terribly mistaken in judgment of the documentary.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
I only take what is documented fact.
So you don't accept the video that you requested I watch a few months ago, anymore ? Or you were kidding then ?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Not quite, the internet is more like a library. On the internet, people have absolute control over what information that they pull up.
Exactly my point. Instead of choosing programs that agree with your bias broadly, you have fine grained control over rejecting anything that challenges your worldview.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
I don't assume facts, I actually look at the source and compare my findings with the information presented. The information presented is fully capable of withstanding an thorough investigation.
And yet, when you had me watch that video, it's producers AND you could do nothing to prove it's claims. You just told me to 'do the research'. Which works for people who are already convinced, but does nothing to prove your case.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
This is exactly what climate change is.
So what ? How does changing the subject support your cause ?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
I suggest you reexamine Fall of the Republic because you are terribly mistaken in judgment of the documentary.
So, it's actually well made and factual, not anything like the videos created to promote it ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
I only take what is documented fact.
So you don't accept the video that you requested I watch a few months ago, anymore ? Or you were kidding then ?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Not quite, the internet is more like a library. On the internet, people have absolute control over what information that they pull up.
Exactly my point. Instead of choosing programs that agree with your bias broadly, you have fine grained control over rejecting anything that challenges your worldview.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
I don't assume facts, I actually look at the source and compare my findings with the information presented. The information presented is fully capable of withstanding an thorough investigation.
And yet, when you had me watch that video, it's producers AND you could do nothing to prove it's claims. You just told me to 'do the research'. Which works for people who are already convinced, but does nothing to prove your case.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
This is exactly what climate change is.
So what ? How does changing the subject support your cause ?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
I suggest you reexamine Fall of the Republic because you are terribly mistaken in judgment of the documentary.
So, it's actually well made and factual, not anything like the videos created to promote it ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Christian Graus wrote:
the video that you requested I watch a few months ago
Christian Graus wrote:
it's producers AND you could do nothing to prove it's claims.
At the end of the documentary all of their sources are presented. You can also go here[^] and look through the bibliography. The handful of links that go to their site must be followed through as more links to its sources will be presented. You just didn't try to look up anything.
Christian Graus wrote:
So, it's actually well made and factual
Exactly.
-
Fall of the Republic is a true documentary covering the fall of the republic. It is not a conspiracy film, I repeat, it is not a conspiracy film. Check out these two new trailers, the very first one is in my sig. This is truly hard-hitting. To get the widest possible audience, it will be available on youtube so this is not an advertisement. Two[^] Three[^][This one is the best]
modified on Thursday, October 8, 2009 2:04 PM