Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. The Eugenicists [modified]

The Eugenicists [modified]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
javadatabaseagentic-ailoungelearning
23 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I Ian Shlasko

    Hold on a second... CSS... I've been trying to give you the benefit of the doubt... But are you seriously in favor of punishing people for their THOUGHTS? That's just over the edge. I don't care if someone's thinking about the most vile, depraved, genocidal acts ever pondered by a human being... As long as they don't ACT on it, it's not a crime.

    Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)

    C Offline
    C Offline
    CaptainSeeSharp
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    Ian Shlasko wrote:

    But are you seriously in favor of punishing people for their THOUGHTS?

    Not through the legal system.

    Fall of the Republic[^]

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C CaptainSeeSharp

      Hitlarians and their henchmen lust to victimize the entire planet and exterminate millions billions in his quest for depopulation where only the desirables have the right to exist under a totalitarian regime. Eugenics was the pseudoscience aimed at "improving" the human race. In its extreme, racist form, this meant wiping away all human beings deemed "unfit," preserving only those who conform to a neo-modern globalist steriotype. Elements of the philosophy were enshrined as national policy by forced sterilization and segregation laws, as well as marriage restrictions, enacted in 27 states. In 1909, California became the third state to adopt such laws. Ultimately, eugenics practitioners coercively sterilized some 60,000 Americans, barred the marriage of thousands, forcibly segregated thousands in "colonies," and persecuted untold numbers in ways we are just learning. Before World War II, nearly half of coercive sterilizations were done in California, and even after the war, the state accounted for a third of all such surgeries. Eugenics would have been so much bizarre parlor talk had it not been for extensive financing by corporate philanthropies, specifically the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman railroad fortune. They were all in league with some of America's most respected scientists from such prestigious universities as Stanford, Yale, Harvard and Princeton. These academicians espoused race theory and race science, and then faked and twisted data and used counterfeit Christians to serve eugenics' racist aims. In 1904, the Carnegie Institution established a laboratory complex at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island that stockpiled millions of index cards on ordinary Americans, as researchers carefully plotted the removal of families, bloodlines and whole peoples. From Cold Spring Harbor, eugenics advocates agitated in the legislatures of America, as well as the nation's social service agencies and associations. The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz. Much of the spiritual guidance and political agitation for the American eugenics movement came from California's quasi-autonomous eugenic societies, such as Pasadena's Human Betterment Foundation and the California branch of the American Eugenics Society, which coordinated much of their activity with the Eugenics Research Society in Long Island. These organizations -- which functioned as part

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Christian Graus
      wrote on last edited by
      #11

      Of course he can't discuss it, he doesn't even understand it. What does 'neo modern mean ? How was Nazism 'globalist' ? It wasn't. Of course it was bad, but the point is, this is ignorant drivel, copied and pasted off the web. http://hnn.us/articles/1796.html[^]

      CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

      Ahh yes, all your eugenicist out there, make yourselves public. You will be brought to justice.

      You can tell when he actually wrote something, because the spelling and grammar get bad. What is always forgotten is that eugenics was considered good science at the time. Of course, it's not, but it's not hard to find people who are wealthy and give their money to science. It doesn't prove any sort of agenda. And while some of what is being said here is undoubtedly true ( Hitler was a racist, looking to give his views a veneer of science ), none of it actually relates to what CSS claims is eugenics today. He's simply incapable of understanding what eugenics means, just like he's incapable of understanding that the planet has a finite size and finite resources.

      Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

      L I 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • C Christian Graus

        Of course he can't discuss it, he doesn't even understand it. What does 'neo modern mean ? How was Nazism 'globalist' ? It wasn't. Of course it was bad, but the point is, this is ignorant drivel, copied and pasted off the web. http://hnn.us/articles/1796.html[^]

        CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

        Ahh yes, all your eugenicist out there, make yourselves public. You will be brought to justice.

        You can tell when he actually wrote something, because the spelling and grammar get bad. What is always forgotten is that eugenics was considered good science at the time. Of course, it's not, but it's not hard to find people who are wealthy and give their money to science. It doesn't prove any sort of agenda. And while some of what is being said here is undoubtedly true ( Hitler was a racist, looking to give his views a veneer of science ), none of it actually relates to what CSS claims is eugenics today. He's simply incapable of understanding what eugenics means, just like he's incapable of understanding that the planet has a finite size and finite resources.

        Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        Christian Graus wrote:

        copied and pasted off the web

        You don't mean "not an original piece of CSS work". Not even an original CSS opinion about it. That can't be a first, can it ? :laugh: :laugh:

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          Christian Graus wrote:

          copied and pasted off the web

          You don't mean "not an original piece of CSS work". Not even an original CSS opinion about it. That can't be a first, can it ? :laugh: :laugh:

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Christian Graus
          wrote on last edited by
          #13

          Richard A. Abbott wrote:

          Not even an original CSS opinion about it

          No, that's what he does, he copies other people's words then refuses to discuss, because he doesn't actually understand.

          Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Christian Graus

            Richard A. Abbott wrote:

            Not even an original CSS opinion about it

            No, that's what he does, he copies other people's words then refuses to discuss, because he doesn't actually understand.

            Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #14

            Oops I forgot the joke icon. :( OT I notice the Tasmanian Police used a rather interesting method for the convicting of a criminal using retrieved DNA from the criminal from a leech. [^] edited with web reference.

            modified on Tuesday, October 20, 2009 5:15 PM

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Oops I forgot the joke icon. :( OT I notice the Tasmanian Police used a rather interesting method for the convicting of a criminal using retrieved DNA from the criminal from a leech. [^] edited with web reference.

              modified on Tuesday, October 20, 2009 5:15 PM

              C Offline
              C Offline
              Christian Graus
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              yeah, I saw that. I haven't read the story, but I noticed it in the paper.

              Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Christian Graus

                Of course he can't discuss it, he doesn't even understand it. What does 'neo modern mean ? How was Nazism 'globalist' ? It wasn't. Of course it was bad, but the point is, this is ignorant drivel, copied and pasted off the web. http://hnn.us/articles/1796.html[^]

                CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                Ahh yes, all your eugenicist out there, make yourselves public. You will be brought to justice.

                You can tell when he actually wrote something, because the spelling and grammar get bad. What is always forgotten is that eugenics was considered good science at the time. Of course, it's not, but it's not hard to find people who are wealthy and give their money to science. It doesn't prove any sort of agenda. And while some of what is being said here is undoubtedly true ( Hitler was a racist, looking to give his views a veneer of science ), none of it actually relates to what CSS claims is eugenics today. He's simply incapable of understanding what eugenics means, just like he's incapable of understanding that the planet has a finite size and finite resources.

                Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

                I Offline
                I Offline
                Ian Shlasko
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                Christian Graus wrote:

                the planet has a finite size and finite resources.

                Not so! I was going to wait until the next development conference, but my company and I will soon be rolling out Earth 2.0 (tm)! It's kind of like Web 2.0, but without Ajax. One of the selling points of Earth 2.0 (tm) is that we completely revisit the architecture of the human species, moving instead to a policy of system-wide miniaturization. Obviously we'll support standard-sized humans for backwards compatibility, but all new humans will automatically be GZipped to no more than three inches tall. That way, their resource consumption will be exponentially reduced, yielding a new paradigm of environmental equilibrium. Companies will of course wish to license this product right away, so as not to be left behind in this technological and biological revolution. Our introductory package will cost only US$11,394 per human per year!

                Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)

                D L 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • C CaptainSeeSharp

                  Eugenics is of human evolution, not dogs. A eugenicist treats his fellow species as cattle.

                  Fall of the Republic[^]

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Dalek Dave
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                  Eugenics is of human evolution, not dogs.

                  You really are a retard. Eugenics is derived from Eu meaning good and Gene meaning born. It has nothing to do with the bollocks you spout. Pre-natal care of mothers is classed as eugeneics, so I suppose you would supress antenatal classes you tosspot. All selective breeding is leading to an idealised version, and if by selectively breeding humans to eradicate congenital genetic defects then why is that a bad thing? In fact it is nature. The weak go to the wall and the species improves. By allowing brainless wankers like you to breed the human race takes a step backwards. Fortunately there is little chance of you breeding as any woman who is willing to breed would like a man not a moron. No go sharpen your crayons.

                  ------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • I Ian Shlasko

                    Christian Graus wrote:

                    the planet has a finite size and finite resources.

                    Not so! I was going to wait until the next development conference, but my company and I will soon be rolling out Earth 2.0 (tm)! It's kind of like Web 2.0, but without Ajax. One of the selling points of Earth 2.0 (tm) is that we completely revisit the architecture of the human species, moving instead to a policy of system-wide miniaturization. Obviously we'll support standard-sized humans for backwards compatibility, but all new humans will automatically be GZipped to no more than three inches tall. That way, their resource consumption will be exponentially reduced, yielding a new paradigm of environmental equilibrium. Companies will of course wish to license this product right away, so as not to be left behind in this technological and biological revolution. Our introductory package will cost only US$11,394 per human per year!

                    Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Dalek Dave
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #18

                    why dont we hollow out the planet and live on the inside surface?

                    ------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925

                    I 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Dalek Dave

                      why dont we hollow out the planet and live on the inside surface?

                      ------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925

                      I Offline
                      I Offline
                      Ian Shlasko
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      Dyson Sphere?[^] Just gotta figure out a way to stick a sun in there.

                      Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • I Ian Shlasko

                        Christian Graus wrote:

                        the planet has a finite size and finite resources.

                        Not so! I was going to wait until the next development conference, but my company and I will soon be rolling out Earth 2.0 (tm)! It's kind of like Web 2.0, but without Ajax. One of the selling points of Earth 2.0 (tm) is that we completely revisit the architecture of the human species, moving instead to a policy of system-wide miniaturization. Obviously we'll support standard-sized humans for backwards compatibility, but all new humans will automatically be GZipped to no more than three inches tall. That way, their resource consumption will be exponentially reduced, yielding a new paradigm of environmental equilibrium. Companies will of course wish to license this product right away, so as not to be left behind in this technological and biological revolution. Our introductory package will cost only US$11,394 per human per year!

                        Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #20

                        Hmmmm.... Ian Schlasko... Slartibartfast... Ian Schlasko... Slartibartfast..... hmmmmmm. I suppose it's possible... :-D

                        I 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Hmmmm.... Ian Schlasko... Slartibartfast... Ian Schlasko... Slartibartfast..... hmmmmmm. I suppose it's possible... :-D

                          I Offline
                          I Offline
                          Ian Shlasko
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #21

                          Oh come on... My name is right there... And ya added a "c" twice :P

                          Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • I Ian Shlasko

                            Oh come on... My name is right there... And ya added a "c" twice :P

                            Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #22

                            So I did... well, hey. I was looking down at the keyboard. Besides, I was having enough trouble with Slartibartfast. :doh: [edit] The sun was in my eyes. The bat was too small. The pitchers mound was too high... [/edit] :laugh:

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C CaptainSeeSharp

                              Ian Shlasko wrote:

                              But are you seriously in favor of punishing people for their THOUGHTS?

                              Not through the legal system.

                              Fall of the Republic[^]

                              D Offline
                              D Offline
                              Distind
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #23

                              Then how exactly?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups