The Eugenicists [modified]
-
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Not even an original CSS opinion about it
No, that's what he does, he copies other people's words then refuses to discuss, because he doesn't actually understand.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Oops I forgot the joke icon. :( OT I notice the Tasmanian Police used a rather interesting method for the convicting of a criminal using retrieved DNA from the criminal from a leech. [^] edited with web reference.
modified on Tuesday, October 20, 2009 5:15 PM
-
Oops I forgot the joke icon. :( OT I notice the Tasmanian Police used a rather interesting method for the convicting of a criminal using retrieved DNA from the criminal from a leech. [^] edited with web reference.
modified on Tuesday, October 20, 2009 5:15 PM
yeah, I saw that. I haven't read the story, but I noticed it in the paper.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Of course he can't discuss it, he doesn't even understand it. What does 'neo modern mean ? How was Nazism 'globalist' ? It wasn't. Of course it was bad, but the point is, this is ignorant drivel, copied and pasted off the web. http://hnn.us/articles/1796.html[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Ahh yes, all your eugenicist out there, make yourselves public. You will be brought to justice.
You can tell when he actually wrote something, because the spelling and grammar get bad. What is always forgotten is that eugenics was considered good science at the time. Of course, it's not, but it's not hard to find people who are wealthy and give their money to science. It doesn't prove any sort of agenda. And while some of what is being said here is undoubtedly true ( Hitler was a racist, looking to give his views a veneer of science ), none of it actually relates to what CSS claims is eugenics today. He's simply incapable of understanding what eugenics means, just like he's incapable of understanding that the planet has a finite size and finite resources.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Christian Graus wrote:
the planet has a finite size and finite resources.
Not so! I was going to wait until the next development conference, but my company and I will soon be rolling out Earth 2.0 (tm)! It's kind of like Web 2.0, but without Ajax. One of the selling points of Earth 2.0 (tm) is that we completely revisit the architecture of the human species, moving instead to a policy of system-wide miniaturization. Obviously we'll support standard-sized humans for backwards compatibility, but all new humans will automatically be GZipped to no more than three inches tall. That way, their resource consumption will be exponentially reduced, yielding a new paradigm of environmental equilibrium. Companies will of course wish to license this product right away, so as not to be left behind in this technological and biological revolution. Our introductory package will cost only US$11,394 per human per year!
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)
-
Eugenics is of human evolution, not dogs. A eugenicist treats his fellow species as cattle.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Eugenics is of human evolution, not dogs.
You really are a retard. Eugenics is derived from Eu meaning good and Gene meaning born. It has nothing to do with the bollocks you spout. Pre-natal care of mothers is classed as eugeneics, so I suppose you would supress antenatal classes you tosspot. All selective breeding is leading to an idealised version, and if by selectively breeding humans to eradicate congenital genetic defects then why is that a bad thing? In fact it is nature. The weak go to the wall and the species improves. By allowing brainless wankers like you to breed the human race takes a step backwards. Fortunately there is little chance of you breeding as any woman who is willing to breed would like a man not a moron. No go sharpen your crayons.
------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925
-
Christian Graus wrote:
the planet has a finite size and finite resources.
Not so! I was going to wait until the next development conference, but my company and I will soon be rolling out Earth 2.0 (tm)! It's kind of like Web 2.0, but without Ajax. One of the selling points of Earth 2.0 (tm) is that we completely revisit the architecture of the human species, moving instead to a policy of system-wide miniaturization. Obviously we'll support standard-sized humans for backwards compatibility, but all new humans will automatically be GZipped to no more than three inches tall. That way, their resource consumption will be exponentially reduced, yielding a new paradigm of environmental equilibrium. Companies will of course wish to license this product right away, so as not to be left behind in this technological and biological revolution. Our introductory package will cost only US$11,394 per human per year!
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)
why dont we hollow out the planet and live on the inside surface?
------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925
-
why dont we hollow out the planet and live on the inside surface?
------------------------------------ To eat well in England, you should have a breakfast three times a day. W. Somerset Maugham 1925
Dyson Sphere?[^] Just gotta figure out a way to stick a sun in there.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)
-
Christian Graus wrote:
the planet has a finite size and finite resources.
Not so! I was going to wait until the next development conference, but my company and I will soon be rolling out Earth 2.0 (tm)! It's kind of like Web 2.0, but without Ajax. One of the selling points of Earth 2.0 (tm) is that we completely revisit the architecture of the human species, moving instead to a policy of system-wide miniaturization. Obviously we'll support standard-sized humans for backwards compatibility, but all new humans will automatically be GZipped to no more than three inches tall. That way, their resource consumption will be exponentially reduced, yielding a new paradigm of environmental equilibrium. Companies will of course wish to license this product right away, so as not to be left behind in this technological and biological revolution. Our introductory package will cost only US$11,394 per human per year!
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)
-
Hmmmm.... Ian Schlasko... Slartibartfast... Ian Schlasko... Slartibartfast..... hmmmmmm. I suppose it's possible... :-D
Oh come on... My name is right there... And ya added a "c" twice :P
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)
-
Oh come on... My name is right there... And ya added a "c" twice :P
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)
-
Ian Shlasko wrote:
But are you seriously in favor of punishing people for their THOUGHTS?
Not through the legal system.