Gardasil Researcher Drops A Bombshell
-
Dr. Diane Harper, lead researcher in the development of two human papilloma virus vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix, said the controversial drugs will do little to reduce cervical cancer rates and, even though they’re being recommended for girls as young as nine, there have been no efficacy trials in children under the age of 15. Dr. Harper, director of the Gynecologic Cancer Prevention Research Group at the University of Missouri, made these remarks during an address at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2-4. Although her talk was intended to promote the vaccine, participants said they came away convinced the vaccine should not be received. “I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn’t help but question why we need the vaccine at all,” said Joan Robinson, Assistant Editor at the Population Research Institute. http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/10/25/top_stories/doc4ae4b76d07e16766677720.txt[^]
-
Dr. Diane Harper, lead researcher in the development of two human papilloma virus vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix, said the controversial drugs will do little to reduce cervical cancer rates and, even though they’re being recommended for girls as young as nine, there have been no efficacy trials in children under the age of 15. Dr. Harper, director of the Gynecologic Cancer Prevention Research Group at the University of Missouri, made these remarks during an address at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2-4. Although her talk was intended to promote the vaccine, participants said they came away convinced the vaccine should not be received. “I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn’t help but question why we need the vaccine at all,” said Joan Robinson, Assistant Editor at the Population Research Institute. http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/10/25/top_stories/doc4ae4b76d07e16766677720.txt[^]
This lady doctor - sounds like she is somewhat disillusioned with her research job and might now be batting for the other team, but it certainly is an interesting way of putting your own job at risk by putting yourself under the spotlight of dubious colour. The UK death reported (in your reference) as attributed to the HPV vaccine, that is misreporting the facts. Immediately after the young girl's death, the batch of the vaccine as used was withdrawn from use and dispatched for full testing. The reason was to establish any probabilities of faulty manufacture or contamination. The fact that no other person who received a jab from the same batch had any unexpected side effects suggests that something other than the vaccine was as fault. Unfortunately, the girl died from other causes established by the Post Morten as reported at her inquest as shown here Cancer Vaccine Girl Died Of Malignant Chest Tumor[^]. So let's not use this sad death as an excuse to further this conspiracy. My references from the other day are extant. Why don't you try and read them *FIRST* without condemning them out of hand. You might learn something new.
-
This lady doctor - sounds like she is somewhat disillusioned with her research job and might now be batting for the other team, but it certainly is an interesting way of putting your own job at risk by putting yourself under the spotlight of dubious colour. The UK death reported (in your reference) as attributed to the HPV vaccine, that is misreporting the facts. Immediately after the young girl's death, the batch of the vaccine as used was withdrawn from use and dispatched for full testing. The reason was to establish any probabilities of faulty manufacture or contamination. The fact that no other person who received a jab from the same batch had any unexpected side effects suggests that something other than the vaccine was as fault. Unfortunately, the girl died from other causes established by the Post Morten as reported at her inquest as shown here Cancer Vaccine Girl Died Of Malignant Chest Tumor[^]. So let's not use this sad death as an excuse to further this conspiracy. My references from the other day are extant. Why don't you try and read them *FIRST* without condemning them out of hand. You might learn something new.
Richard A. Abbott wrote:
Why don't you try and read them *FIRST* without condemning them out of hand. You might learn something new.
You just answered your own question.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.