ADL Calls Alex Jones “Conspiracy King,” Insinuates He Should be Removed from Society
-
-
For those who don't want to visit the nutjob site, here's the real link after clicking through... http://www.adl.org/special_reports/rage-grows-in-America/default.asp[^] (Haven't read this yet... About to)
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)
Alex Jones is a wingnut. Listening to him is a form of entertainment, all be it a bad form. The article is very interesting in how in breaks up and almost chronicles the attitude going on in the country right now in politics. I've pretty much stopped watching TV because of people like Beck and the Fake News Channel. People like CSS and Illion want to feel special by telling us all this stuff that isn't true. The hero off to save us all. Don't kill the messenger they say. The only difference between the two of them that I see is Illion is quite as belligerent and extreme as CSS when it comes to conspiracy theories. TV was always best used for educational use. Discovery and History Channel are my favorites ;P .
-
Its hardly factual. Read the reply that I originally posted.
Did you even read the actual article? Your little AJ post basically boils down to, "These guys don't agree with us, and they're talking about us, so they must be part of the evil conspiracy!" The article states facts. It lists the beliefs of the AJists (And others), and theorizes that these movements MAY lead to violence. It then cites one incident that bordered on violence, and one that led to the deaths of several policemen. If you want to debate this article, why don't you quote from the actual article, instead of quoting your buddy Alex's spin on it. Here's that link again, in case you can't find it in my previous post: Main Article[^] Sub-Section on Alex Jones[^] Sub-Section on the Oath Keepers[^]
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)
-
Alex Jones is a wingnut. Listening to him is a form of entertainment, all be it a bad form. The article is very interesting in how in breaks up and almost chronicles the attitude going on in the country right now in politics. I've pretty much stopped watching TV because of people like Beck and the Fake News Channel. People like CSS and Illion want to feel special by telling us all this stuff that isn't true. The hero off to save us all. Don't kill the messenger they say. The only difference between the two of them that I see is Illion is quite as belligerent and extreme as CSS when it comes to conspiracy theories. TV was always best used for educational use. Discovery and History Channel are my favorites ;P .
Nah, I stick with HBO and Sci-Fi (Which inexplicably calls itself "SyFy" now)... The less realistic, the better. I get my news from the web, from as many different sources as possible.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)
-
Did you even read the actual article? Your little AJ post basically boils down to, "These guys don't agree with us, and they're talking about us, so they must be part of the evil conspiracy!" The article states facts. It lists the beliefs of the AJists (And others), and theorizes that these movements MAY lead to violence. It then cites one incident that bordered on violence, and one that led to the deaths of several policemen. If you want to debate this article, why don't you quote from the actual article, instead of quoting your buddy Alex's spin on it. Here's that link again, in case you can't find it in my previous post: Main Article[^] Sub-Section on Alex Jones[^] Sub-Section on the Oath Keepers[^]
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)
I read the article. It is a total smear campaign and nothing more. it attacks any American who doesn't like whats going on in this country by calling them dangerous, violent, racist, crazy, extreme, and delusional. Bullshit on that. Fuck you and your subversive buddies.
-
I read the article. It is a total smear campaign and nothing more. it attacks any American who doesn't like whats going on in this country by calling them dangerous, violent, racist, crazy, extreme, and delusional. Bullshit on that. Fuck you and your subversive buddies.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
it attacks any American who doesn't like whats going on in this country by calling them dangerous, violent, racist, crazy, extreme, and delusional.
violent, racist, crazy, extreme, and delusional.
Generally speaking, pick any two and you have someone referred to by the article.
-
Did you even read the actual article? Your little AJ post basically boils down to, "These guys don't agree with us, and they're talking about us, so they must be part of the evil conspiracy!" The article states facts. It lists the beliefs of the AJists (And others), and theorizes that these movements MAY lead to violence. It then cites one incident that bordered on violence, and one that led to the deaths of several policemen. If you want to debate this article, why don't you quote from the actual article, instead of quoting your buddy Alex's spin on it. Here's that link again, in case you can't find it in my previous post: Main Article[^] Sub-Section on Alex Jones[^] Sub-Section on the Oath Keepers[^]
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)
Ian Shlasko wrote:
theorizes that these movements MAY lead to violence.
This is what's got me concerned with the current bend in politics right now and media. JFK was killed rather easily by some wack job and Obama could just as easily. It only takes one wing nut to come loose to do it.
-
Ian Shlasko wrote:
theorizes that these movements MAY lead to violence.
This is what's got me concerned with the current bend in politics right now and media. JFK was killed rather easily by some wack job and Obama could just as easily. It only takes one wing nut to come loose to do it.
I'm for Obama being impeached and tried as a criminal, along with all of his walstreet buddies.
-
The ADL is doing the race baiting, along with the likes of you. Shame on you.
-
I'm for Obama being impeached and tried as a criminal, along with all of his walstreet buddies.
-
I read the article. It is a total smear campaign and nothing more. it attacks any American who doesn't like whats going on in this country by calling them dangerous, violent, racist, crazy, extreme, and delusional. Bullshit on that. Fuck you and your subversive buddies.
Really? Well, time for a simple text search, among the main article and all of the sub-articles...
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
dangerous
dangerous: 2 mentions, saying that Beck claims that Obama is "dangerous"
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
violent
violent: "...potential for a rise of violent anti-government acts..." "...these theories allege dark, violent designs..." "...increasing their willingness to take extreme, even violent, action..." "Violent imagery:" (Accompanying picture of a banner showing an M16) "...Open calls to violent action are rare..."
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
racist
"...including Nazi imagery, racist imagery..." "...were also racist signs and..." (Both quotes accompanied by images of protesters holding posters with racist slogans)
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
crazy
Zero occurrences. I could go on, but I think it's pretty clear that you haven't read the article at all, and are basing all of your assumptions on Alex's spin.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)
-
I'm for Obama being impeached and tried as a criminal, along with all of his walstreet buddies.
Those
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
walstreet buddies.
are the same ones Bush had.
-
Those
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
walstreet buddies.
are the same ones Bush had.
Yeah, they are criminals. They are the sames ones Clinton had, and Bush Sr. they are criminals. This stuff has been going on for many many decades and they have been getting away with it. Now its just out in the open in your face.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
it attacks any American who doesn't like whats going on in this country by calling them dangerous, violent, racist, crazy, extreme, and delusional.
violent, racist, crazy, extreme, and delusional.
Generally speaking, pick any two and you have someone referred to by the article.
Once you get to delusional, the others quickly fall into place. :) I think that was CSS's start point, well his tipping point anyhow. Being an uneducated lout was his starting point.
You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
-
I read the article. It is a total smear campaign and nothing more. it attacks any American who doesn't like whats going on in this country by calling them dangerous, violent, racist, crazy, extreme, and delusional. Bullshit on that. Fuck you and your subversive buddies.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
calling them dangerous, violent, racist, crazy, extreme, and delusional. bullsh*t on that. f*** you and your subversive buddies.
You don't sound like any of those things when you talk this way.....
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.