Digital STRIP SEARCH - Inverted Airport Body Scanner Image Shows NAKED Bodies In Full Living COLOR!
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNi-n7jk8FU[^] CNN - Body scanners can STORE, send IMAGES, group says http://www.cnn.com/2010/TRAVEL/01/11/body.scanners/index.html[^] The TSA specified in 2008 documents that the machines must have image storage and sending abilities, the Washington-based Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) said. In the documents, obtained by the privacy group and provided to CNN, the TSA specifies that the body scanners it purchases must have the ability to store and send images when in "test mode." ---------------------------------------- ----- A quick look at what is/will be available for the airport screeners to view...in the name of safety, of course. http://www.infowars.com/inverted-body-scanner-image-shows-naked-body-in-full-living-color/[^] The full body scanners that President Obama last night authorized to be rolled out in airports across the country at a cost of over $1 billion dollars not only produce detailed pictures of your genitals, but once inverted some of those images also display YOUR NAKED BODY in full living COLOR. And you dont need to be a graphics wizard using a $600 software suite like Photoshop to pull off the trick inverting a photo is a simple process that takes one click and is an option available even in the most BASIC image editing software. We were sent examples of the process by readers and then tested it for ourselves to confirm that simply inverting some of the pictures produced by the body scanners creates a near-perfect replica of a naked body in full color. It is important to stress that this is a low resolution image. Airport screeners will have access to huge HIGH DEFINATION images that, once inverted, will allow them to see every minute detail of your body. The inversion trick doesn't work for all the sample images produced by body scanners, but with or without its application, every image will still show details of your sexual organs. Even without
JustGetUsThere had the phoney photo sussed on January 8th[^]. InfoWars posted the blown story on January 10th[^]. What is worse is that he was told that the image was a fake on the Alex Jones Show, as this comment on the above story shows: know the truth January 11th, 2010 at 9:08 pm I called the show Sunday and as soon as I said to Alex the photo was a stock image, he couldn't get me off the air fast enough. He cut my mic and wouldn't let me speak. Then one of his crew said "Turn your radio down", it wasnt even on. They want to promote this disinformation and later, when it come[s] out that it's a fake, Alex will say he didnt produce, he was just reporting what everyone else was. What a joke. I thought he was on our side, I'm not sure now where he stands. (My emphasis, and edited for punctuation.) As I advised you: Think "Hardin", and check the facts.
Bob Emmett @ Ynys Thanatos
-
I guess in your mind only news organizations that present the fact are tabloid, and the ones that parrot the government politispeak are "fact".
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
Neither one. I'd rather take my chances with the terrorist. Even with the "terrorist" flying is still far safer than driving, but it seems that is not the case anymore with perverts, pedophiles, and power-tripping TSA ex burger flippers commanding their will on passengers. Also adding the fact that the government routinly stages an event to push and agenda and increase sales of a particular technology or pharmaceutical for one of their revolving door buddies. *Cough* Micheal Chirdoff “They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security.” -Benjamin Franklin
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
JustGetUsThere had the phoney photo sussed on January 8th[^]. InfoWars posted the blown story on January 10th[^]. What is worse is that he was told that the image was a fake on the Alex Jones Show, as this comment on the above story shows: know the truth January 11th, 2010 at 9:08 pm I called the show Sunday and as soon as I said to Alex the photo was a stock image, he couldn't get me off the air fast enough. He cut my mic and wouldn't let me speak. Then one of his crew said "Turn your radio down", it wasnt even on. They want to promote this disinformation and later, when it come[s] out that it's a fake, Alex will say he didnt produce, he was just reporting what everyone else was. What a joke. I thought he was on our side, I'm not sure now where he stands. (My emphasis, and edited for punctuation.) As I advised you: Think "Hardin", and check the facts.
Bob Emmett @ Ynys Thanatos
Proof that they are fake? I submitted my proof that they are real, detailed, and high resolution. Now submit your proof that they are fake.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
Proof that they are fake? I submitted my proof that they are real, detailed, and high resolution. Now submit your proof that they are fake.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
Did you follow the JustGetUsThere link? Of course you didn't, you might just arrive at the truth, which would confuse you. Try this then Body in 360°[^]. Recognise any'body'?
Bob Emmett @ Ynys Thanatos
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/jan/04/new-scanners-child-porn-laws[^] Reassurances that airport screeners wont be able to save the images will provide little comfort to parents who know that the crystal clear image of their naked son or daughter being ogled by a TSA thug can merely be snapped with a handheld camera for their enjoyment later. Apologists for the scanners have routinely described the images they produce as ghostly or skeletal in an effort to downplay the intrusion of privacy they really represent. As we reported yesterday, claims that the body scanners did not provide details of genitals were DISPROVEN after a London Guardian journalist who was present at a trial for the machines earlier this week reported that the devices produce an image which make genitals eerily visible. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jan/07/full-body-scan-uk-airport[^]
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/jan/04/new-scanners-child-porn-laws[^] Reassurances that airport screeners wont be able to save the images will provide little comfort to parents who know that the crystal clear image of their naked son or daughter being ogled by a TSA thug can merely be snapped with a handheld camera for their enjoyment later. Apologists for the scanners have routinely described the images they produce as ghostly or skeletal in an effort to downplay the intrusion of privacy they really represent. As we reported yesterday, claims that the body scanners did not provide details of genitals were DISPROVEN after a London Guardian journalist who was present at a trial for the machines earlier this week reported that the devices produce an image which make genitals eerily visible. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jan/07/full-body-scan-uk-airport[^]
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Reassurances that airport screeners wont be able to save the images will provide little comfort to parents who know that the crystal clear image of their naked son or daughter being ogled by a TSA thug can merely be snapped with a handheld camera for their enjoyment later. Apologists for the scanners have routinely described the images they produce as ghostly or skeletal in an effort to downplay the intrusion of privacy they really represent. As we reported yesterday, claims that the body scanners did not provide details of genitals were DISPROVEN after a London Guardian journalist who was present at a trial for the machines earlier this week reported that the devices produce an image which make genitals eerily visible.
Irrelevant to the subject - Uncle Alex knew all along that the Scanner Image was phoney. ============================================= Now, what about the stock images published by InfoWars on January 10th (days after they were proven to be fake), even after Uncle Alex had been informed that they were fake, live, on the Alex Jones Show on Sunday January 10th?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
A quick look at what is/will be available for the airport screeners to view...in the name of safety, of course. http://www.infowars.com/inverted-body-scanner-image-shows-naked-body-in-full-living-color/\[^\] The full body scanners that President Obama last night authorized to be rolled out in airports across the country at a cost of over $1 billion dollars not only produce detailed pictures of your genitals, but once inverted some of those images also display YOUR NAKED BODY in full living COLOR. And you dont need to be a graphics wizard using a $600 software suite like Photoshop to pull off the trick inverting a photo is a simple process that takes one click and is an option available even in the most BASIC image editing software. We were sent examples of the process by readers and then tested it for ourselves to confirm that simply inverting some of the pictures produced by the body scanners creates a near-perfect replica of a naked body in full color. It is important to stress that this is a low resolution image. Airport screeners will have access to huge HIGH DEFINATION images that, once inverted, will allow them to see every minute detail of your body. The inversion trick doesn't work for all the sample images produced by body scanners, but with or with
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNi-n7jk8FU[^] CNN - Body scanners can STORE, send IMAGES, group says http://www.cnn.com/2010/TRAVEL/01/11/body.scanners/index.html[^] The TSA specified in 2008 documents that the machines must have image storage and sending abilities, the Washington-based Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) said. In the documents, obtained by the privacy group and provided to CNN, the TSA specifies that the body scanners it purchases must have the ability to store and send images when in "test mode." ---------------------------------------- ----- A quick look at what is/will be available for the airport screeners to view...in the name of safety, of course. http://www.infowars.com/inverted-body-scanner-image-shows-naked-body-in-full-living-color/[^] The full body scanners that President Obama last night authorized to be rolled out in airports across the country at a cost of over $1 billion dollars not only produce detailed pictures of your genitals, but once inverted some of those images also display YOUR NAKED BODY in full living COLOR. And you dont need to be a graphics wizard using a $600 software suite like Photoshop to pull off the trick inverting a photo is a simple process that takes one click and is an option available even in the most BASIC image editing software. We were sent examples of the process by readers and then tested it for ourselves to confirm that simply inverting some of the pictures produced by the body scanners creates a near-perfect replica of a naked body in full color. It is important to stress that this is a low resolution image. Airport screeners will have access to huge HIGH DEFINATION images that, once inverted, will allow them to see every minute detail of your body. The inversion trick doesn't work for all the sample images produced by body scanners, but with or without its application, every image will still show details of your sexual organs. Even without
Good god dude: 0) This is really old freaking news 1) So basically, if you ever had children, you'd never take them to a doctor for fear of the doctor ogling their naked body during an exam. 2) You're more than happy for someone to be able to sneak aboard a ceramic material weapon instead then?
-
Neither one. I'd rather take my chances with the terrorist. Even with the "terrorist" flying is still far safer than driving, but it seems that is not the case anymore with perverts, pedophiles, and power-tripping TSA ex burger flippers commanding their will on passengers. Also adding the fact that the government routinly stages an event to push and agenda and increase sales of a particular technology or pharmaceutical for one of their revolving door buddies. *Cough* Micheal Chirdoff “They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security.” -Benjamin Franklin
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
Do you regularly drive with a car full of "perverts, pedophiles, and power-tripping TSA ex burger flippers"? Or is this your family? Who mentioned any of these? Your 'argument' was that people could see me or my family nude if we wish to fly in the future. This in my opinion is vastly preferable to the massive loss of life if terrorist action destroyed a plane full of people over a school. The car / plane safety statistics are well known, and take no account of terrorist action: partly because it is a relatively new development; partly because since it became obvious air travel was a target steps have been taken which have prevented the destruction; and partly because terrorists are not going to target individual cars.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNi-n7jk8FU[^] CNN - Body scanners can STORE, send IMAGES, group says http://www.cnn.com/2010/TRAVEL/01/11/body.scanners/index.html[^] The TSA specified in 2008 documents that the machines must have image storage and sending abilities, the Washington-based Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) said. In the documents, obtained by the privacy group and provided to CNN, the TSA specifies that the body scanners it purchases must have the ability to store and send images when in "test mode." ---------------------------------------- ----- A quick look at what is/will be available for the airport screeners to view...in the name of safety, of course. http://www.infowars.com/inverted-body-scanner-image-shows-naked-body-in-full-living-color/[^] The full body scanners that President Obama last night authorized to be rolled out in airports across the country at a cost of over $1 billion dollars not only produce detailed pictures of your genitals, but once inverted some of those images also display YOUR NAKED BODY in full living COLOR. And you dont need to be a graphics wizard using a $600 software suite like Photoshop to pull off the trick inverting a photo is a simple process that takes one click and is an option available even in the most BASIC image editing software. We were sent examples of the process by readers and then tested it for ourselves to confirm that simply inverting some of the pictures produced by the body scanners creates a near-perfect replica of a naked body in full color. It is important to stress that this is a low resolution image. Airport screeners will have access to huge HIGH DEFINATION images that, once inverted, will allow them to see every minute detail of your body. The inversion trick doesn't work for all the sample images produced by body scanners, but with or without its application, every image will still show details of your sexual organs. Even without
-
I can't help but feel sorry for the operators of these things. Assuming they do exist and work as given here, do you know what 5 days a week of looking at the average American in the buff would do to the human psyche?
