A sane question
-
Tim Craig wrote:
And how is it that you prove people are liars? :suss:
Come now! You *know* that I provide evidence ... and the kiddies of "the community" (when they were able to do so) delete it. In the case of Graus, I've provided the evidence on so many occasions that there is no longer any need to explicitly do so yet again.
Ilíon wrote:
In the case of Graus, I've provided the evidence on so many occasions that there is no longer any need to explicitly do so yet again.
You are so intellectually dishonest.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Yes, I was in Australia when Martin Bryant went nuts in Tassie. While I personally thought the terms of the gun buy back were onerous in some contexts and it was by no means handled properly by the Police (in NSW at least), It is without doubt that it made a huge change to crime rates. Unfortunately, Sydney and Melbourne are awash with hand guns, mostly being brandished by young 'wanna-be' 'merican gangstas. (But too gutless to shoot each other :laugh: ) What I find disturbing is that the US shooting today was 15% of Australias total annual gunshot deaths, and the victim count was relatively light compared to others.
I don't speak Idiot - please talk slowly and clearly 'This space for rent' Driven to the arms of Heineken by the wife
Andy_L_J wrote:
What I find disturbing is that the US shooting today was 15% of Australias total annual gunshot deaths, and the victim count was relatively light compared to others.
Yeah, no matter how you slice it, these mass shootings do away with the 'per capita' comparisons, on the basis that we don't have them at all, since the buy back, and we had them so rarely before ( some of those 13 have to have been gang wars, I don't see how else the number could get that high ), and in one fell swoop, then kill a significant percentage of all the deaths we have in a year.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Tim Craig wrote:
And how is it that you prove people are liars? :suss:
Come now! You *know* that I provide evidence ... and the kiddies of "the community" (when they were able to do so) delete it. In the case of Graus, I've provided the evidence on so many occasions that there is no longer any need to explicitly do so yet again.
Ilíon wrote:
Come now! You *know* that I provide evidence
Now that's the funniest thing you've ever said. :laugh: Demented and false, but funny.
You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
-
Andy_L_J wrote:
What I find disturbing is that the US shooting today was 15% of Australias total annual gunshot deaths, and the victim count was relatively light compared to others.
Yeah, no matter how you slice it, these mass shootings do away with the 'per capita' comparisons, on the basis that we don't have them at all, since the buy back, and we had them so rarely before ( some of those 13 have to have been gang wars, I don't see how else the number could get that high ), and in one fell swoop, then kill a significant percentage of all the deaths we have in a year.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Unfortunately, if they banned guns in the US a significant number of F___wits wouldn't get shot.
I don't speak Idiot - please talk slowly and clearly 'This space for rent' Driven to the arms of Heineken by the wife
ROTFL !!!
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Ilíon wrote:
Come now! You *know* that I provide evidence
Now that's the funniest thing you've ever said. :laugh: Demented and false, but funny.
You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
Tim Craig wrote:
Demented and false
I believe the preferred terminology is 'intellectually dishonest'.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Tim Craig wrote:
Demented and false
I believe the preferred terminology is 'intellectually dishonest'.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Christian Graus wrote:
I'm sorry, I was not talking to you. I was talking to intelligent people.
Ah. But, these hypothetical intelligent people ignore you to an even greater degree than I do, do they not? And I ignore you almost completely.
You do not ignore him you daft twat. You carry on with you c#ntish assertations and never answer his valid points. Like above. So go on then you dickless twat, answer him fully with a reasoned argument.
------------------------------------ No Good Deed Goes Unpunished Clare Boothe Luce
-
If the people claiming that gun buybacks cause crime and gun deaths can be shown to be liars, if the people claiming that airport scanners are taking full body nude pictures are proven to have known they are lying, then what sort of moron would continue to believe these sort of conspiracy theories ?
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Someone who's not been able to get on in life in the way they thought so rather than fixing it or accepting that they have their limits, comes up with other explanations as to why they are unable to achieve their goals. Acceptance is usually the harder option but sometimes you just have to accept that you cannot build a Cold Fusion Powered Rocket Pack Propelled Iron Man suit in your garage because you're not Tony Stark.
-
Someone who's not been able to get on in life in the way they thought so rather than fixing it or accepting that they have their limits, comes up with other explanations as to why they are unable to achieve their goals. Acceptance is usually the harder option but sometimes you just have to accept that you cannot build a Cold Fusion Powered Rocket Pack Propelled Iron Man suit in your garage because you're not Tony Stark.
JHizzle wrote:
Cold Fusion Powered Rocket Pack Propelled Iron Man suit
Pah! Old technology. I have a Zero Point Energy Pack wired to a Stargate Device in my toilet. I'd show you it if you like but you better give it ten minutes.
------------------------------------ No Good Deed Goes Unpunished Clare Boothe Luce
-
Someone who's not been able to get on in life in the way they thought so rather than fixing it or accepting that they have their limits, comes up with other explanations as to why they are unable to achieve their goals. Acceptance is usually the harder option but sometimes you just have to accept that you cannot build a Cold Fusion Powered Rocket Pack Propelled Iron Man suit in your garage because you're not Tony Stark.
JHizzle wrote:
sometimes you just have to accept that you cannot build a Cold Fusion Powered Rocket Pack Propelled Iron Man suit in your garage because you're not Tony Stark.
That is definitely sig worthy.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
JHizzle wrote:
Cold Fusion Powered Rocket Pack Propelled Iron Man suit
Pah! Old technology. I have a Zero Point Energy Pack wired to a Stargate Device in my toilet. I'd show you it if you like but you better give it ten minutes.
------------------------------------ No Good Deed Goes Unpunished Clare Boothe Luce
-
You throw (i.e. "argue") like a girl. And, we've all seen how you "prove" that someone is a liar -- you assert it, and that settles it. But then, since you are yourself intellectually dishonest, I guess it stands to reason that that method works for you.
-
Tim Craig wrote:
And how is it that you prove people are liars? :suss:
Come now! You *know* that I provide evidence ... and the kiddies of "the community" (when they were able to do so) delete it. In the case of Graus, I've provided the evidence on so many occasions that there is no longer any need to explicitly do so yet again.
Ilíon wrote:
and the kiddies of "the community" (when they were able to do so) delete[d] it.
Still rankles, eh? Perhaps if you had not constantly resorted to 'Silly child', 'kiddies', 'intellectual dishonesty', and asterisks, and actually argued rationally, you would not have been considered a gnat that needed swatting.
Ilíon wrote:
In the case of Graus, I've provided the evidence on so many occasions that there is no longer any need to explicitly do so yet again.
Of course not. The inspiring discussions of the Back Room are, of course, engraved in the tablets of our memory. Your every word being especially cherished. :rolleyes:
Bob Emmett @ Ynys Thanatos
-
JHizzle wrote:
sometimes you just have to accept that you cannot build a Cold Fusion Powered Rocket Pack Propelled Iron Man suit in your garage because you're not Tony Stark.
That is definitely sig worthy.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Christian Graus wrote:
JHizzle wrote: sometimes you just have to accept that you cannot build a Cold Fusion Powered Rocket Pack Propelled Iron Man suit in your garage because you're not Tony Stark. That is definitely sig worthy.
That's really funny. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: