Domesticated, compartmentalized, ignorant, ninnies...
-
Are you serious ? I just tested, and three is all you need ( I googled 'sex' ).
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
damn, didn't even try that. I was looking for a specific body part...
-
damn, didn't even try that. I was looking for a specific body part...
-
josda1000 wrote:
Like that millimeter thing... I don't even get that really.
When you go to the airport, and also now many courthouses and possibly any government building such as the DMV, you will be required to go through the naked body scanner, which has the ability to save and transmit your biometric naked image. It works somewhat similar as X-rays, except that milimeter waves are less penetrating, the purpose is to look under your clothing. There are even mobile units that are to be deployed onto the streets. Its called being a humiliated, dehumanized slave. I suggest you do your research, you are in front of the computer right now.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
No, see he was talking about not understanding HOW YOU COULD BE SO FREAKING WRONG ABOUT THE TECH!!!! Bob explained what it does. You said it was not inferred scanners(hilarious, btw, when you meant infra-red) and you link to an article that refutes you. The images it shows can in no way be contrived to be full color or even good biometric data, and the privacy concerns paragraph directly contradicts your claims. The paragraph detailing the technical details has a link to millimeter wave info. This info is pretty much exactly what he said. The purpose of these machines is not to "look under your clothing" it is to check to see if you have anything metallic hidden on your person. This is a subtle but important difference. They don't care how big (or small) your wang is, they care if you have what might be a bomb on you. Most of security in airports is theater. Make it look good and hope no terrorists figure out how laughably easy it is to circumvent while making the common moron happy because they feel safer. If you folks would concentrate on that aspect, the utter pathetic worthlessness of half these measure, that would be a much better way to convince people of the stupidity of this. Instead you drum up a fake image, make ludicrous claims, and when called on it deny the facts. Seriously, quit being ridiculous and try being logical. And look up black propaganda while you are at it.
-
I hate my brain, there's most likely a two letter combination that'd get you those hits. Begins with a B...
See, I am not looking for male parts. Though DD might do it...
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
I suggest you do some very basic research before you spew out blatantly ignorant bullsh*t like that.
I did, I read the papers published during the scanner development, and the fact sheets of several scanners on the market. And you read?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
These are millimeter wave scanners
That's right. As I said:
Bob Emmett wrote:
And the scanner operates between Infra-Red and Microwave (non-visible).
Millimetre waves occupy the region of the electromagnetic spectrum bewteen microwaves and the infra-red[^] i.e., a non-visible part of the spectrum.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
not inferred scanners.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: No, certainly not inferred scanners.
Bob Emmett @ Ynys Thanatos
-
No, see he was talking about not understanding HOW YOU COULD BE SO FREAKING WRONG ABOUT THE TECH!!!! Bob explained what it does. You said it was not inferred scanners(hilarious, btw, when you meant infra-red) and you link to an article that refutes you. The images it shows can in no way be contrived to be full color or even good biometric data, and the privacy concerns paragraph directly contradicts your claims. The paragraph detailing the technical details has a link to millimeter wave info. This info is pretty much exactly what he said. The purpose of these machines is not to "look under your clothing" it is to check to see if you have anything metallic hidden on your person. This is a subtle but important difference. They don't care how big (or small) your wang is, they care if you have what might be a bomb on you. Most of security in airports is theater. Make it look good and hope no terrorists figure out how laughably easy it is to circumvent while making the common moron happy because they feel safer. If you folks would concentrate on that aspect, the utter pathetic worthlessness of half these measure, that would be a much better way to convince people of the stupidity of this. Instead you drum up a fake image, make ludicrous claims, and when called on it deny the facts. Seriously, quit being ridiculous and try being logical. And look up black propaganda while you are at it.
ragnaroknrol wrote:
Bob explained what it does.
Bob doesn't have a goddamn clue what it is. It is not a heat camera. It works similarly to an X-ray device except that the wavelength the scanners use are less penetrating than x-rays.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
They are not heat cameras.
No, they are not heat cameras, they are millimetre wave (MMW) scanners. Here is another puzzle for you: MMW scanners require a source of 'illumination' which isn't a light. :wtf: It is a MMW beam, and thus not visible. The MMW scanner detects the reflected 'illumination', which is processed to provide a temperature map of the scanned body. Objects are detected by the difference in temperature. A ceramic knife would be colder, and thus darker in the image. I didn't invent the terminology, it is used in the documentation. Read more, post less.
Bob Emmett @ Ynys Thanatos
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
They are not heat cameras.
No, they are not heat cameras, they are millimetre wave (MMW) scanners. Here is another puzzle for you: MMW scanners require a source of 'illumination' which isn't a light. :wtf: It is a MMW beam, and thus not visible. The MMW scanner detects the reflected 'illumination', which is processed to provide a temperature map of the scanned body. Objects are detected by the difference in temperature. A ceramic knife would be colder, and thus darker in the image. I didn't invent the terminology, it is used in the documentation. Read more, post less.
Bob Emmett @ Ynys Thanatos
It has nothing to do with temperature, it doesn't read the bodies temperature.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
It has nothing to do with temperature, it doesn't read the bodies temperature.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
It has nothing to do with temperature, it doesn't read the bodies body's (FTFY) temperature.
Quite right, it doesn't. It calculates a temperature map from the reflected MMW 'illumination'. That's what "The MMW scanner detects the reflected 'illumination', which is processed to provide a temperature map of the scanned body." means. If you have problems with the terms 'illumination' and 'temperature', go talk to the scientists who designed these machines. You might also ask them why they use the terms 'current' and 'flow', when electricity is not a liquid. Read more, post less.
Bob Emmett @ Ynys Thanatos
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
I suggest you do some very basic research before you spew out blatantly ignorant bullsh*t like that.
I did, I read the papers published during the scanner development, and the fact sheets of several scanners on the market. And you read?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
These are millimeter wave scanners
That's right. As I said:
Bob Emmett wrote:
And the scanner operates between Infra-Red and Microwave (non-visible).
Millimetre waves occupy the region of the electromagnetic spectrum bewteen microwaves and the infra-red[^] i.e., a non-visible part of the spectrum.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
not inferred scanners.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: No, certainly not inferred scanners.
Bob Emmett @ Ynys Thanatos
-
Bob Emmett wrote:
No, certainly not inferred scanners.
CSS's inferrer is busted anyhow. :laugh:
You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
-
ragnaroknrol wrote:
Bob explained what it does.
Bob doesn't have a goddamn clue what it is. It is not a heat camera. It works similarly to an X-ray device except that the wavelength the scanners use are less penetrating than x-rays.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Bob doesn't have a goddamn clue what it is.
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: From the genius who was suckered into believing that x-rays and millimetre waves could return 'living colour' images. :rolleyes:
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
It is not a heat camera.
Quite right. It is not a heat camera, it is a millimetre wave (MMW) scanner. The body is illuminated by the MMW, which is reflected by the body beneath the clothing (which is transparent at this wavelength). The MMW scanner detects the reflected illumination, which is processed to provide a temperature map of the scanned body. Objects are detected by the difference in temperature. A ceramic knife would be colder, and thus darker in the image. Read more, post less.
Bob Emmett @ Ynys Thanatos