No, really CaptainSeeSharp
-
josda1000 used rational logic and cited non-youtube, reputable sources which meant rational discourse and some credability came about. CSS came back to destroy that.
Fuck josda. He agreed with you all when it was convenient, and kissed your asses. That is not rational logic.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
Fuck josda. He agreed with you all when it was convenient, and kissed your asses. That is not rational logic.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
Not really, he spanked you because you wouldn't know logic if I clubbed you with it, and you are a walking example of everything wrong with some of the views he espouses. But really, do you know enough physics to know why we can't have a picture of someone under their clothes? Anything about electromagnetic spectrum and the interaction with human senses? The slightest damn clue how full of crap you have to be to think inverting colors on an image suddenly gives you the ability to see through clothes?
-
Fuck josda. He agreed with you all when it was convenient, and kissed your asses. That is not rational logic.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
So why are you here? I thought you had better things to do.
-
So why are you here? I thought you had better things to do.
-
Fuck josda. He agreed with you all when it was convenient, and kissed your asses. That is not rational logic.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
He agreed with you all when it was convenient
No, I agree with them only for the fact that you can't argue a point without calling people names, and with no backing of your own. Argue in your own words, AND with citation, without namecalling. Then, and ONLY then, you'll get some respect. I respect you for thinking outside the NORMAL box. But you've built yourself a box. I didn't kiss anyone's ass. I argue with them logically. Notice that's precisely what I'md doing right now. I'm not calling you a name, while you do it to me. And I'm on your "team" if you will. Nice job at discrediting yourself.
-
:laugh:
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
He agreed with you all when it was convenient
No, I agree with them only for the fact that you can't argue a point without calling people names, and with no backing of your own. Argue in your own words, AND with citation, without namecalling. Then, and ONLY then, you'll get some respect. I respect you for thinking outside the NORMAL box. But you've built yourself a box. I didn't kiss anyone's ass. I argue with them logically. Notice that's precisely what I'md doing right now. I'm not calling you a name, while you do it to me. And I'm on your "team" if you will. Nice job at discrediting yourself.
I've cited loads of documents, whitepapers, lines and page numbers of bills, mainstream news articles, documentaries, and direct CSPAN video of bernake and paulson being questioned so many times its ridiculous. Now tell me what you have cited.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
I've cited loads of documents, whitepapers, lines and page numbers of bills, mainstream news articles, documentaries, and direct CSPAN video of bernake and paulson being questioned so many times its ridiculous. Now tell me what you have cited.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
Why are you putting ME on the defensive?! My answer to you anyway: The United States Constitution (the most important part) United States Code Code of Federal Regulations Newspieces (on both sides of the argument). But my argument here is that, when you cite something, all you do is say, "Hey look! You guys are ignorant and stupid! Can't you see something in your face?!" So what I'm saying is, instead of just posting a link, write something of your own opinion and words, and don't make it sound like something out of Area 51 or outer space. Make a logical point and conclusion. My problem with Alex Jones is that, while the vaccinations were detrimental to the ones that took it, he thought we were going to death camps if we didn't take them. Notice we're still here. We're ok. Life goes on. Yes we may be debt slaves still, but we aren't in prison or anything. He goes too far. As do you. You have no backing, really. Rex 84 didn't happen. FEMA camps didn't happen. Y2K didn't happen. Life goes on. Put some logic into the arguments. Thanks for playing.
-
Why are you putting ME on the defensive?! My answer to you anyway: The United States Constitution (the most important part) United States Code Code of Federal Regulations Newspieces (on both sides of the argument). But my argument here is that, when you cite something, all you do is say, "Hey look! You guys are ignorant and stupid! Can't you see something in your face?!" So what I'm saying is, instead of just posting a link, write something of your own opinion and words, and don't make it sound like something out of Area 51 or outer space. Make a logical point and conclusion. My problem with Alex Jones is that, while the vaccinations were detrimental to the ones that took it, he thought we were going to death camps if we didn't take them. Notice we're still here. We're ok. Life goes on. Yes we may be debt slaves still, but we aren't in prison or anything. He goes too far. As do you. You have no backing, really. Rex 84 didn't happen. FEMA camps didn't happen. Y2K didn't happen. Life goes on. Put some logic into the arguments. Thanks for playing.
-
josda1000 wrote:
Y2K didn't happen.
Because action was taken to ensure that it didn't happen.
Bob Emmett @ Ynys Thanatos
Well that's kinda what I mean though. People (because humans are smart) found a way to not let it happen. Do you really think that people would just line up for the FEMA camps?! come on. Yes, I realize that's kinda what happened with the holocaust, but only because they were pitting race vs race. Most people nowadays are enlightened to not do so, even though there are still racists in the country. It wouldn't have happened. I think you see my point. You just need to look at the greater picture.
-
Well that's kinda what I mean though. People (because humans are smart) found a way to not let it happen. Do you really think that people would just line up for the FEMA camps?! come on. Yes, I realize that's kinda what happened with the holocaust, but only because they were pitting race vs race. Most people nowadays are enlightened to not do so, even though there are still racists in the country. It wouldn't have happened. I think you see my point. You just need to look at the greater picture.
-
Why are you putting ME on the defensive?! My answer to you anyway: The United States Constitution (the most important part) United States Code Code of Federal Regulations Newspieces (on both sides of the argument). But my argument here is that, when you cite something, all you do is say, "Hey look! You guys are ignorant and stupid! Can't you see something in your face?!" So what I'm saying is, instead of just posting a link, write something of your own opinion and words, and don't make it sound like something out of Area 51 or outer space. Make a logical point and conclusion. My problem with Alex Jones is that, while the vaccinations were detrimental to the ones that took it, he thought we were going to death camps if we didn't take them. Notice we're still here. We're ok. Life goes on. Yes we may be debt slaves still, but we aren't in prison or anything. He goes too far. As do you. You have no backing, really. Rex 84 didn't happen. FEMA camps didn't happen. Y2K didn't happen. Life goes on. Put some logic into the arguments. Thanks for playing.
josda1000 wrote:
he thought we were going to death camps
No he didn't. He said there are laws and regulation in place for quarantine of those who refuse the shots. Particularly in Massachusetts.
josda1000 wrote:
but we aren't in prison or anything
Phh, until you find out that your constitutional rights have been usurped. :rolleyes:
josda1000 wrote:
FEMA camps didn't happen.
Oh so the Japanese weren't rounded up and forced to live and work in camps. Oh...that could NEVER happen.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
josda1000 wrote:
he thought we were going to death camps
No he didn't. He said there are laws and regulation in place for quarantine of those who refuse the shots. Particularly in Massachusetts.
josda1000 wrote:
but we aren't in prison or anything
Phh, until you find out that your constitutional rights have been usurped. :rolleyes:
josda1000 wrote:
FEMA camps didn't happen.
Oh so the Japanese weren't rounded up and forced to live and work in camps. Oh...that could NEVER happen.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
No he didn't. He said there are laws and regulation in place for quarantine of those who refuse the shots. Particularly in Massachusetts.
Keep making those excuses. Don't you recall the youtube video you posted about the 'prison' that was not used, and was going to be a death camp ? All your claims about mercury causing autism ? All my posts explaining that autism is not a disease, and you can't catch it ?
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Oh so the Japanese weren't rounded up and forced to live and work in camps. Oh...that could NEVER happen.
Just because it did happen, in specific circumstances, doesn't prove it's going to happen in completely different ones.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
josda1000 wrote:
he thought we were going to death camps
No he didn't. He said there are laws and regulation in place for quarantine of those who refuse the shots. Particularly in Massachusetts.
josda1000 wrote:
but we aren't in prison or anything
Phh, until you find out that your constitutional rights have been usurped. :rolleyes:
josda1000 wrote:
FEMA camps didn't happen.
Oh so the Japanese weren't rounded up and forced to live and work in camps. Oh...that could NEVER happen.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
No he didn't. He said there are laws and regulation in place for quarantine of those who refuse the shots. Particularly in Massachusetts.
Incorrect. Do your research. S2028 is still in the Massachusetts House of Representatives, and it has been watered down quite a bit. BELIEVE ME... I live in Lowell MA, I had to look it up. Do your research.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
until you find out that your constitutional rights have been usurped.
As if I didn't know that. Why would I do a show with my kind of content, if I didn't already know this? Most of the first ten amendments have been trampled over. Duh.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Oh so the Japanese weren't rounded up and forced to live and work in camps.
Yes, I realize this. But that's when we had major racists in the country. If they were to ever go after the whole populous, you'd have a war on your hands. People in military would not just go along with that. Sorry. Class dismissed.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
No he didn't. He said there are laws and regulation in place for quarantine of those who refuse the shots. Particularly in Massachusetts.
Incorrect. Do your research. S2028 is still in the Massachusetts House of Representatives, and it has been watered down quite a bit. BELIEVE ME... I live in Lowell MA, I had to look it up. Do your research.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
until you find out that your constitutional rights have been usurped.
As if I didn't know that. Why would I do a show with my kind of content, if I didn't already know this? Most of the first ten amendments have been trampled over. Duh.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Oh so the Japanese weren't rounded up and forced to live and work in camps.
Yes, I realize this. But that's when we had major racists in the country. If they were to ever go after the whole populous, you'd have a war on your hands. People in military would not just go along with that. Sorry. Class dismissed.
josda1000 wrote:
People in military would not just go along with that.
That's the other major flaw with the 'we need guns to protect us from the government' theory. The military refusing to attack the civilians they swore to protect, is a far greater reason that will never happen, than the ownership of a few pop guns.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
josda1000 wrote:
People in military would not just go along with that.
That's the other major flaw with the 'we need guns to protect us from the government' theory. The military refusing to attack the civilians they swore to protect, is a far greater reason that will never happen, than the ownership of a few pop guns.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Well, don't take it out of context. It did happen in Germany, and even here, like CSS said, with the Japanese. But if you're talking about imprisoning the whole of the people, that will just NOT happen. If there's an actual revolt/revolution though, the military would be against us, definitely. So yes, you do need the second amendment. BUT the government would not take a first step in that direction toward total imprisonment. They would lose, definitely.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
No he didn't. He said there are laws and regulation in place for quarantine of those who refuse the shots. Particularly in Massachusetts.
Incorrect. Do your research. S2028 is still in the Massachusetts House of Representatives, and it has been watered down quite a bit. BELIEVE ME... I live in Lowell MA, I had to look it up. Do your research.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
until you find out that your constitutional rights have been usurped.
As if I didn't know that. Why would I do a show with my kind of content, if I didn't already know this? Most of the first ten amendments have been trampled over. Duh.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Oh so the Japanese weren't rounded up and forced to live and work in camps.
Yes, I realize this. But that's when we had major racists in the country. If they were to ever go after the whole populous, you'd have a war on your hands. People in military would not just go along with that. Sorry. Class dismissed.
We live in different times, but the same thing goes on. War on Terror, War on Drugs, War on Climate Change, it all leads to absolute tyranny in the end unless people stand up and take action, denial will only progress tyranny.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
-
Why did you come back? You said where not worth it, you said you had better shit to do. You said we cannot be educated and that we where not worth your time. Why the hell did you come back here?
Check out the CodeProject forum Guidelines[^] The original soapbox 1.0 is back![^]
I note he did not answer you.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
We live in different times, but the same thing goes on. War on Terror, War on Drugs, War on Climate Change, it all leads to absolute tyranny in the end unless people stand up and take action, denial will only progress tyranny.
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]
This is one of those meaningless, unqualified statements that impress you so when people make them on youtube, and you get so confused that they don't work in the real world.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Well, don't take it out of context. It did happen in Germany, and even here, like CSS said, with the Japanese. But if you're talking about imprisoning the whole of the people, that will just NOT happen. If there's an actual revolt/revolution though, the military would be against us, definitely. So yes, you do need the second amendment. BUT the government would not take a first step in that direction toward total imprisonment. They would lose, definitely.
josda1000 wrote:
But if you're talking about imprisoning the whole of the people, that will just NOT happen.
If everyone is completely dependent on the government for food, shelter, clothing, heat, and they are so indoctrinated and brainwashed, do you not think people will go into shelters if there is an economic collapse with terrorist and bio-threats all over the place and people just want to be safe and fed. The propaganda line would possibly be "Red Cross Center - People Helping People".
Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] Sons Of Liberty - Free Album (They sound very much like Metallica, great lyrics too)[^]