Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Water vapour, the unknown factor, till now. [moved]

Water vapour, the unknown factor, till now. [moved]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
combeta-testinghelpannouncementcode-review
47 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J josda1000

    CSS?

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Jeremy Falcon
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    HTML?

    Jeremy Falcon

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Rama Krishna Vavilala

      :suss: fat_boy?

      Click here to get a Google Wave Invite.

      J Offline
      J Offline
      josda1000
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      CSS?

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Jeremy Falcon

        HTML?

        Jeremy Falcon

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Rama Krishna Vavilala
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        JavaScript?

        Click here to get a Google Wave Invite.

        J 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Rama Krishna Vavilala

          JavaScript?

          Click here to get a Google Wave Invite.

          J Offline
          J Offline
          josda1000
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          C++, obviously.

          R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Abhinav S

            nick stern wrote:

            It looks like the issue of water vapour, always discounted by the GCMs, is being explored more completely.

            And we've blamed petrol for global warming all these years. :omg:

            Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest.
            Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Corporal Agarn
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            Water is bad for you :laugh: drink beer!

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N nick stern

              Water Vapor Largely Responsible for Global Warming..."What I will say, is that this shows there are climate scientists round the world who are trying very hard to understand and to explain to people openly and honestly what has happened over the last decade." ...The research, facilitated by a state-of-the-art NASA satellite codenamed AIRS, suggests that water vapor is responsible for twice the global warming effect of carbon dioxide, both man-made and naturally occurring. While this theory was has been carried by climate change skeptics for some time, global warming advocates dismissed them, saying that water vapor in the atmosphere was only a feedback effect caused by human emissions. NASA scientist Eric Fetzer say that the new study created models much more accurate to past events than those previously used by climate change advocates, and proves that "water vapor is the big player in the atmosphere as far as climate is concerned." [^] It looks like the issue of water vapour, always discounted by the GCMs, is being explored more completely. Lets hope with the current fiasco taking pace at the IPCC, and CRU that we might see some more mature science, and prognostications, in the future.

              moved on Wednesday, February 3, 2010 5:16 PM

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              About time! After all, the IPCC reduced CO2 forcing from 2.4 to 1.7 for the 4th AR. There is no reason it cant be reduced further now that more research is being done into previously mis-understood factors. Next solar. and coamic rays and CO2 can be put way at the back.

              Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J josda1000

                C++, obviously.

                R Offline
                R Offline
                ragnaroknrol
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                XML?

                N 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Corporal Agarn

                  Water is bad for you :laugh: drink beer!

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  djj55 wrote:

                  drink beer!

                  Heretic! Beer production produces vast amounts of CO2! And bread! They must be banned immediately! :)

                  Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R ragnaroknrol

                    XML?

                    N Offline
                    N Offline
                    nick stern
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    ADA?

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      djj55 wrote:

                      drink beer!

                      Heretic! Beer production produces vast amounts of CO2! And bread! They must be banned immediately! :)

                      Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Corporal Agarn
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      You need to drink up then. :laugh: By the way I am a teetotaler, just thought the comment needed made.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Rama Krishna Vavilala

                        :suss: fat_boy?

                        Click here to get a Google Wave Invite.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        Nope, I am over here.

                        Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N nick stern

                          ADA?

                          P Offline
                          P Offline
                          Pete OHanlon
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          Lovelace?

                          "WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith

                          As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.

                          My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • P Pete OHanlon

                            Lovelace?

                            "WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith

                            As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.

                            My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            Yep, the first programmer! Disnt her sister write Frankenstein or some such?

                            Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                            C P 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              Yep, the first programmer! Disnt her sister write Frankenstein or some such?

                              Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              Corporal Agarn
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #17

                              Youngster!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                Yep, the first programmer! Disnt her sister write Frankenstein or some such?

                                Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                                P Offline
                                P Offline
                                Pete OHanlon
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #18

                                She was Byron's daughter - Mary Shelley befriended her father.

                                "WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith

                                As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.

                                My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • N nick stern

                                  Water Vapor Largely Responsible for Global Warming..."What I will say, is that this shows there are climate scientists round the world who are trying very hard to understand and to explain to people openly and honestly what has happened over the last decade." ...The research, facilitated by a state-of-the-art NASA satellite codenamed AIRS, suggests that water vapor is responsible for twice the global warming effect of carbon dioxide, both man-made and naturally occurring. While this theory was has been carried by climate change skeptics for some time, global warming advocates dismissed them, saying that water vapor in the atmosphere was only a feedback effect caused by human emissions. NASA scientist Eric Fetzer say that the new study created models much more accurate to past events than those previously used by climate change advocates, and proves that "water vapor is the big player in the atmosphere as far as climate is concerned." [^] It looks like the issue of water vapour, always discounted by the GCMs, is being explored more completely. Lets hope with the current fiasco taking pace at the IPCC, and CRU that we might see some more mature science, and prognostications, in the future.

                                  moved on Wednesday, February 3, 2010 5:16 PM

                                  S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  Shog9 0
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #19

                                  http://www.ecofactory.com/news/noaa-nasa-water-vapor-largely-responsible-global-warming-012910[^]:

                                  The research, facilitated by a state-of-the-art NASA satellite codenamed AIRS, suggests that water vapor is responsible for twice the global warming effect of carbon dioxide, both man-made and naturally occurring.

                                  Pay close attention to the bit in bold...

                                  http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/vapor_warming.html[^]

                                  Andrew Dessler and colleagues from Texas A&M University in College Station confirmed that the heat-amplifying effect of water vapor is potent enough to double the climate warming caused by increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

                                  ...and again, the bit in bold. The second article, used as a source by the first, implies that water vapor acts as an amplifier on warming caused by CO2, not a separate and doubly-effective factor in warming. A small change in wording, but a rather large difference in meaning! Nate Kharrl needs to go back to grade school.

                                  C J L 3 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Shog9 0

                                    http://www.ecofactory.com/news/noaa-nasa-water-vapor-largely-responsible-global-warming-012910[^]:

                                    The research, facilitated by a state-of-the-art NASA satellite codenamed AIRS, suggests that water vapor is responsible for twice the global warming effect of carbon dioxide, both man-made and naturally occurring.

                                    Pay close attention to the bit in bold...

                                    http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/vapor_warming.html[^]

                                    Andrew Dessler and colleagues from Texas A&M University in College Station confirmed that the heat-amplifying effect of water vapor is potent enough to double the climate warming caused by increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

                                    ...and again, the bit in bold. The second article, used as a source by the first, implies that water vapor acts as an amplifier on warming caused by CO2, not a separate and doubly-effective factor in warming. A small change in wording, but a rather large difference in meaning! Nate Kharrl needs to go back to grade school.

                                    C Offline
                                    C Offline
                                    Chris Losinger
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #20

                                    pshaw. don't you know that some things are just too exciting to get right ?

                                    image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                                    S L 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R Rama Krishna Vavilala

                                      :suss: fat_boy?

                                      Click here to get a Google Wave Invite.

                                      S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Shog9 0
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #21

                                      Heh, don't be silly. I'm sure "nick" joined the site last Friday for the scintillating discussions that frequently pop up here... and just hasn't quite had time to participate in any of them yet... :rolleyes:

                                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C Chris Losinger

                                        pshaw. don't you know that some things are just too exciting to get right ?

                                        image processing toolkits | batch image processing

                                        S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        Shog9 0
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #22

                                        Chris Losinger wrote:

                                        don't you know that some things are just too exciting to get right ?

                                        Mmm, yes of course... I suppose if he'd been in a more calm state of mind he would have remembered to omit the link to the source. :-\

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Shog9 0

                                          http://www.ecofactory.com/news/noaa-nasa-water-vapor-largely-responsible-global-warming-012910[^]:

                                          The research, facilitated by a state-of-the-art NASA satellite codenamed AIRS, suggests that water vapor is responsible for twice the global warming effect of carbon dioxide, both man-made and naturally occurring.

                                          Pay close attention to the bit in bold...

                                          http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/vapor_warming.html[^]

                                          Andrew Dessler and colleagues from Texas A&M University in College Station confirmed that the heat-amplifying effect of water vapor is potent enough to double the climate warming caused by increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

                                          ...and again, the bit in bold. The second article, used as a source by the first, implies that water vapor acts as an amplifier on warming caused by CO2, not a separate and doubly-effective factor in warming. A small change in wording, but a rather large difference in meaning! Nate Kharrl needs to go back to grade school.

                                          J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          Jorgen Sigvardsson
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #23

                                          No, no, no, no. You are supposed to read the text like a 100% dyslectic, claim that you have read it all and understood it all. Then you google for information that supports your claim, no matter what the source is, and exlaim QED. It'll take you a while though, because remember, you are 100% dyslectic. When people dismiss you as being a real spamming pain in the ass, you will start whining about it, just like 5 year olds do. You will then come to the conclusion that you are the martyr victim, and everybody else is actively out to get you. What were you thinking?

                                          -- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit

                                          L 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups