Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C#
  4. PropertyGrid fails to group a property marked as being in Category Behavior.

PropertyGrid fails to group a property marked as being in Category Behavior.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C#
algorithmsquestion
12 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    Paw Jershauge wrote:

    Try display this in the PropertyGrid.

    I've tried using your code, and it seems to work;

    public partial class MainForm : Form
    {
    PropertyGrid grid = new PropertyGrid();
    Demo myDemo = new Demo();

    public MainForm()
    {
        InitializeComponent();
    	
        grid.Dock = DockStyle.Fill;
        grid.SelectedObject = myDemo;
        Controls.Add(grid);			
    }
    

    }
    public class Demo
    {
    [Category("Behavior")]
    public int Total
    {
    get;
    set;
    }
    }

    Are you inheriting from Object, as the snippet suggests?

    I are Troll :suss:

    P Offline
    P Offline
    Paw Jershauge
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    What kind of OS er you using ??? also Windows 7 64bit ??? I have made a screendump. take a look here ScreenDump

    With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid...:-\ :-\

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P Paw Jershauge

      What kind of OS er you using ??? also Windows 7 64bit ??? I have made a screendump. take a look here ScreenDump

      With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid...:-\ :-\

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Paw Jershauge wrote:

      What kind of OS er you using ??? also Windows 7 64bit ???

      Windows XP, 32 bit. I'm getting a category-heading as expected, both with .NET 3.5 as with 4.0. Is it only reproducable on 64-bit Weven?

      I are Troll :suss:

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Paw Jershauge wrote:

        What kind of OS er you using ??? also Windows 7 64bit ???

        Windows XP, 32 bit. I'm getting a category-heading as expected, both with .NET 3.5 as with 4.0. Is it only reproducable on 64-bit Weven?

        I are Troll :suss:

        P Offline
        P Offline
        Paw Jershauge
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        Dont know, will look into it tomorrow on work... but its kind of funny dont you think ? ;) I think i will try different kinds of OS's and 32 & 64 bit versions to see if i can get the fault. But still i dont know why... i have asked microsoft, but still no answer...

        With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid...:-\ :-\

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P Paw Jershauge

          Dont know, will look into it tomorrow on work... but its kind of funny dont you think ? ;) I think i will try different kinds of OS's and 32 & 64 bit versions to see if i can get the fault. But still i dont know why... i have asked microsoft, but still no answer...

          With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid...:-\ :-\

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          Paw Jershauge wrote:

          Dont know, will look into it tomorrow on work... but its kind of funny dont you think ?

          That it is - I'm curious what caused it.

          Paw Jershauge wrote:

          i have asked microsoft, but still no answer...

          Over Microsoft Connect?

          P 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            Paw Jershauge wrote:

            Dont know, will look into it tomorrow on work... but its kind of funny dont you think ?

            That it is - I'm curious what caused it.

            Paw Jershauge wrote:

            i have asked microsoft, but still no answer...

            Over Microsoft Connect?

            P Offline
            P Offline
            Paw Jershauge
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Yes over Connect... the reason I posted it here, was to see if others had the same experience. When i get the answer i will post it here.

            With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid...:-\ :-\

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Paw Jershauge wrote:

              Dont know, will look into it tomorrow on work... but its kind of funny dont you think ?

              That it is - I'm curious what caused it.

              Paw Jershauge wrote:

              i have asked microsoft, but still no answer...

              Over Microsoft Connect?

              P Offline
              P Offline
              Paw Jershauge
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Just a short follow up: The same happens on a Vista 64 bit. So the error/bug is now confirmed on the following OS: - Windows 7 (64 bit) - Vista (64 bit) Its running correctly on (No bug): - Windows 7 (32 bit) - Vista (32 bit) - Xp (32 bit)

              With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid...:-\ :-\

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Paw Jershauge

                Just a short follow up: The same happens on a Vista 64 bit. So the error/bug is now confirmed on the following OS: - Windows 7 (64 bit) - Vista (64 bit) Its running correctly on (No bug): - Windows 7 (32 bit) - Vista (32 bit) - Xp (32 bit)

                With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid...:-\ :-\

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Thanks, good to have a future reference :)

                I are Troll :suss:

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  Thanks, good to have a future reference :)

                  I are Troll :suss:

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  Paw Jershauge
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  Ok so heres the real bug, although its not really a bug, its more a culture thing. When running the propertygrid in the danish language, the following CategoryAttribute will be translated: Category("Appearance") = Udseende Category("Behavior") = Type (the correct word for this would be "adfærd" or "opførsel" and NOT Type) Category("Data") = Data Category("Font") = Skrifttype Category("List") = Oversigt (the correct word for this would be "List" or "Liste" and NOT Oversigt) Category("Misc") = Diverse Category("Position") = Placering Category("Scale") = Skalering Category("Text") = Tekst I didnt consider the culture thing because translating Behavior to danish is not Type I've posted the information on my blog here: C# and I[^]

                  With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid...:-\ :-\

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P Paw Jershauge

                    Ok so heres the real bug, although its not really a bug, its more a culture thing. When running the propertygrid in the danish language, the following CategoryAttribute will be translated: Category("Appearance") = Udseende Category("Behavior") = Type (the correct word for this would be "adfærd" or "opførsel" and NOT Type) Category("Data") = Data Category("Font") = Skrifttype Category("List") = Oversigt (the correct word for this would be "List" or "Liste" and NOT Oversigt) Category("Misc") = Diverse Category("Position") = Placering Category("Scale") = Skalering Category("Text") = Tekst I didnt consider the culture thing because translating Behavior to danish is not Type I've posted the information on my blog here: C# and I[^]

                    With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid...:-\ :-\

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    Cool, good to have it logged. Let's hope it'll be rectified in the next update :)

                    I are Troll :suss:

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Cool, good to have it logged. Let's hope it'll be rectified in the next update :)

                      I are Troll :suss:

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Paw Jershauge
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Well I found since I just downloaded the VS 2010 RTM, that its corrected in the framework 4.0, but having thats said, I dont know if danish version will be corrected... hehe lets see when that come out.

                      With great code, comes great complexity, so keep it simple stupid...:-\ :-\

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups