quick syntax question
-
Google is NOT your friend :-) http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&FamilyID=dfbf523c-f98c-4804-afbd-459e846b268e[^] But I haven't got the impression that it's different from 3.0 regarding the ternary operator.
Thanks Michel. I have been expecting Bing to become better at finding MS stuff. They wouldn't dare putting in some meta tags to fool other search engines, would they?
Michel Godfroid wrote:
Google is NOT your friend
Yes he is, he is my best mate; he knows almost everything I don't know (and that is a lot). Can't do without him. :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
Prolific encyclopedia fixture proof-reader browser patron addict?
We all depend on the beast below.
-
The second meaning is also what's used by the compiler, so it's probably that :) But I can't really find any good "C# 4 language specification" documents, do you know one? Google didn't seem in the mood to give me useful results.. I found some drafts, but well, they're drafts.. or does that mean that the C# 4 specs aren't "official" yet?
modified on Monday, April 26, 2010 5:31 PM
The sentence "The expressions of an argument list are always evaluated in the order they are written" is still present in the 4.0 document Michel provided a link for. And it now has an example with named parameters. Great. :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
Prolific encyclopedia fixture proof-reader browser patron addict?
We all depend on the beast below.