Again with BP
-
Gary Kirkham wrote:
What I don't believe is that you have met a sufficient number of people who believe that way to paint the entire group of millions with that same brush.
That's the beauty of belief. You can belief anything you want with some or no facts what so ever. That's called faith. While I haven't met all of them or even most of them, just about every one of them has said things like this to me in one form or another. Usually its pretty predictable that if they think something like Obama is a socialist, than it follows that he wasn't born in the US or something else similar to that. Some people behaved similarly to Bush/Chaney, but the difference I saw was no one was looking for a birth certificate or calling the other side traitors, fascist, or unamerican. When people start throwing around terms like that I stop listening to them because the conversation has turned into a kind of hyperbole throw up that has no purpose, logic or reason in solving any problem or based in any reality I'm a part of.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
Whew, your head is far up your ass if you believe obama isn't a socialist. You have been drinking too much kool-aid. Grape flavor no doubt.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
Whew, your head is far up your ass if you believe obama isn't a socialist. You have been drinking too much kool-aid. Grape flavor no doubt.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
Disagreed. I'm with Ron Paul on this, he's a corporatist. Fascist.
Josh Davis
Always looking for blackjack. Or maybe White Frank. One of the two.josda1000 wrote:
Disagreed. I'm with Ron Paul on this, he's a corporatist. Fascist.
Well, the welfare state is socialist, progressive income tax is socialist, public education is socialist, public health is socialist. I prefer to refer to Obama as a socialist, but he could be referred to as a corporatist. Corporatist, socialist, communist, facist, its all tyranny. The most accurate label for Obama would be tyrant.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
josda1000 wrote:
Disagreed. I'm with Ron Paul on this, he's a corporatist. Fascist.
Well, the welfare state is socialist, progressive income tax is socialist, public education is socialist, public health is socialist. I prefer to refer to Obama as a socialist, but he could be referred to as a corporatist. Corporatist, socialist, communist, facist, its all tyranny. The most accurate label for Obama would be tyrant.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
Well, as they said in The Patriot: "Would you tell me please, Mr. Howard, why should I trade one tyrant three thousand miles away for three thousand tyrants one mile away? An elected legislature can trample a man's rights as easily as a king can." The Congress is of two houses. One house is of 100 tyrants, the other of 435. Then there's the Chief tyrant, called Mr. President. Still more lie in the SCOTUS. 9 of them.
Josh Davis
Always looking for blackjack. Or maybe White Frank. One of the two. -
josda1000 wrote:
Disagreed. I'm with Ron Paul on this, he's a corporatist. Fascist.
Well, the welfare state is socialist, progressive income tax is socialist, public education is socialist, public health is socialist. I prefer to refer to Obama as a socialist, but he could be referred to as a corporatist. Corporatist, socialist, communist, facist, its all tyranny. The most accurate label for Obama would be tyrant.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
The most accurate label for Obama would be tyrant.
Which is exactly why you have the freedom to say so. Retard.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
The most accurate label for Obama would be tyrant.
Which is exactly why you have the freedom to say so. Retard.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Christian Graus wrote:
Which is exactly why you have the freedom to say so.
So in your little head just because I can say Obama is a tyrant in a backroom message board that means Obama isn't a tyrant?
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
Gary Kirkham wrote:
What I don't believe is that you have met a sufficient number of people who believe that way to paint the entire group of millions with that same brush.
That's the beauty of belief. You can belief anything you want with some or no facts what so ever. That's called faith. While I haven't met all of them or even most of them, just about every one of them has said things like this to me in one form or another. Usually its pretty predictable that if they think something like Obama is a socialist, than it follows that he wasn't born in the US or something else similar to that. Some people behaved similarly to Bush/Chaney, but the difference I saw was no one was looking for a birth certificate or calling the other side traitors, fascist, or unamerican. When people start throwing around terms like that I stop listening to them because the conversation has turned into a kind of hyperbole throw up that has no purpose, logic or reason in solving any problem or based in any reality I'm a part of.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
Come back when you have a clue.
Gary Kirkham Forever Forgiven and Alive in the Spirit It's against my relationship to have a religion. Me blog, You read
-
Christian Graus wrote:
Which is exactly why you have the freedom to say so.
So in your little head just because I can say Obama is a tyrant in a backroom message board that means Obama isn't a tyrant?
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
So in your little head just because I can say Obama is a tyrant in a backroom message board that means Obama isn't a tyrant?
No, because you can go to the white house and say so in front of his fence says you do. You can go to public gatherings and say so means you are free. You can call him that on the phone or online and not have someone come "re-educate" you.. You can even join a militia full of whack jobs and not worry as long as no one breaks a law.
If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.
-
Christian Graus wrote:
Which is exactly why you have the freedom to say so.
So in your little head just because I can say Obama is a tyrant in a backroom message board that means Obama isn't a tyrant?
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
Despite this being called the backroom, it's still very much a public forum open to whatever spy software "they" feel like using, and you know it. So, given the already established fact that you are a coward, the fact that you feel you can say Obama (dear firefox spell check: No, I don't mean Obadiah) is a tyrant openly is proof enough that you don't "really" believe it.
-
Despite this being called the backroom, it's still very much a public forum open to whatever spy software "they" feel like using, and you know it. So, given the already established fact that you are a coward, the fact that you feel you can say Obama (dear firefox spell check: No, I don't mean Obadiah) is a tyrant openly is proof enough that you don't "really" believe it.
James L. Thomson wrote:
given the already established fact that you are a coward, the fact that you feel you can say Obama (dear firefox spell check: No, I don't mean Obadiah) is a tyrant openly is proof enough that you don't "really" believe it.
go post in the lounge so I can give you a 5. :)
If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.
-
Christian Graus wrote:
Which is exactly why you have the freedom to say so.
So in your little head just because I can say Obama is a tyrant in a backroom message board that means Obama isn't a tyrant?
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
It's the start of the mountain of evidence that shows you're an idiot, and that at a MINIMUM, anything you say is grossly exaggerated.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.