Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. New Bill Gives Obama ‘Kill Switch’ To Shut Down The Internet

New Bill Gives Obama ‘Kill Switch’ To Shut Down The Internet

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
databasecomsecurityquestion
81 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Christian Graus

    You are stupid. Obama can shut down the whole internet ? OR do you just not realise that Obama has no power over the rest of the world ? Or even what the 'rest of the world' is ?

    Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

    I Offline
    I Offline
    Ian Shlasko
    wrote on last edited by
    #72

    Technically the Internet could be severely crippled from within the US, simply because the vast majority of the backbones are routed through the US. The Internet would adapt and stay online, albeit without the US-based servers/sites/users, but there would be a non-trivial degradation of performance. Of course, "Obama can shut down the Internet" is a completely false statement, even assuming that this ridiculous piece of legislation makes it past the first committee, gets voted on, passes, gets sent to the House, passes there, and doesn't get vetoed, all of this without being watered down... So this is all irrelevant.

    Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
    Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C Christian Graus

      josda1000 wrote:

      But the reasons as to why you can be arrested for such abuses:

      Ah, so I am free to say it, but not free to not be arrested ? Well, that's what I believe, too. I think, for example, that neo Nazis should be given the light of day, so they can be openly mocked, in the dark, their views fester. But, some people think free speech means being able to say whatever you like, with no consequences.

      josda1000 wrote:

      To suggest that all people of a particular race should be killed is ok, but actually doing it is murder, and you must be prosecuted.

      So you can say it, so long as you don't mean it ? I disagree, here. My freedom should never impinge on the freedom of others. That's really the simple concept. I am free to not be interfered with, but so are you.

      josda1000 wrote:

      Again, if you're going to defend freedom, you really have to defend it. Just because something's not PC doesn't mean that it's completely wrong.

      That much is true. But, there are things that it is unreasonable for anyone to suggest are not wrong.

      Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

      R Offline
      R Offline
      RichardM1
      wrote on last edited by
      #73

      Christian Graus wrote:

      there are things that it is unreasonable for anyone to suggest are not wrong.

      You mean, things like Christianity? I'm OK if yo are willing to let someone decide what those things are, as long as I am the one. If anyone else wants to decide, screw 'em.

      Opacity, the new Transparency.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J josda1000

        CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

        I think the presedent will shutdown the internet during a revolution.

        Now that's a good point. But, with that in mind, there's no reason to believe it would happen. Unless, this violence escalates, which I doubt because it seems that the tea parties are already having an impact, which would hurt that cause and maybe shut them up. So I still think you're taking it way too far, even for me.

        Josh Davis
        Always looking for blackjack. Or maybe White Frank. One of the two.

        C Offline
        C Offline
        CaptainSeeSharp
        wrote on last edited by
        #74

        josda1000 wrote:

        So I still think you're taking it way too far, even for me.

        It isn't me that is taking it too far, its the government. The bill is not a conspiracy theory.

        Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C CaptainSeeSharp

          I didn't say Obama will actually use the power, but he will have the power, and so will the presidents after him. You can say it will cause a revolution, but will it really? I think the presedent will shutdown the internet during a revolution.

          Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #75

          CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

          I think the presedent will shutdown the internet during a revolution.

          I can see the cause of your concern. While all the real activists are out changing their country, you will be sat at home with no internet.

          Bob Emmett New Eugenicist - The weekly magazine for intelligent parenting. Published by the New World Order Press.

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C CaptainSeeSharp

            josda1000 wrote:

            So I still think you're taking it way too far, even for me.

            It isn't me that is taking it too far, its the government. The bill is not a conspiracy theory.

            Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Christian Graus
            wrote on last edited by
            #76

            CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

            The bill is not a conspiracy theory.

            The multiple levels of illiteracy in that statement will keep me amused for days. No, the bill is not. Your theory about the bill, is.

            Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

              I think the presedent will shutdown the internet during a revolution.

              I can see the cause of your concern. While all the real activists are out changing their country, you will be sat at home with no internet.

              Bob Emmett New Eugenicist - The weekly magazine for intelligent parenting. Published by the New World Order Press.

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stephen Hewitt
              wrote on last edited by
              #77

              If there's a revolution perhaps you'll have more pressing concerns.

              Steve

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R RichardM1

                Nagy Vilmos wrote:

                flying monkey gonnad

                Bill, is that the gonad of a flying monkey, or did someone throw the gonad of a non-flight qualified monkey?

                Opacity, the new Transparency.

                J Offline
                J Offline
                JHizzle
                wrote on last edited by
                #78

                Either way you've put some hideous images in my brain. Where's the damn bleach?!?

                R 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Christian Graus

                  Free speech has to have limits. I'm not saying I agree with where they are (although I can't think of any example I disagree with too strongly), but it's still true, there have to be limits, it's not some great mantra that must always be obeyed.

                  Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #79

                  Christian Graus wrote:

                  Free speech has to have limits

                  Why? If the listener is of a reasonable mind then he will ignore any free speach he considers ranting lunacy. If not, then he is already sufficiently disturbed and free speach wil do nothing but affirm his mental illness.

                  Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J JHizzle

                    Either way you've put some hideous images in my brain. Where's the damn bleach?!?

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    RichardM1
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #80

                    [tipping hat] Glad I could be of assistance! :laugh: :-O I think the zombies in Washington outlawed brain bleach. Something about changing the flavor too much.

                    Opacity, the new Transparency.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Stephen Hewitt

                      If there's a revolution perhaps you'll have more pressing concerns.

                      Steve

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #81

                      Stephen Hewitt wrote:

                      If there's a revolution perhaps you'll have more pressing concerns.

                      Not Captain SeeVee, he exists only as a comment on a forum.

                      Bob Emmett New Eugenicist - The weekly magazine for intelligent parenting. Published by the New World Order Press.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups