Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Congressional Hearings

Congressional Hearings

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
helpquestioncomjson
47 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R R Giskard Reventlov

    I'm listening to this live: at present each member of the committee is allotted time to make an opening statement (several minutes). So far one has yielded her time so as to give more time to the hearings, several others have stuck to the facts. The rest have all made political speeches. What a pack of blow-hards: what is the point: don't make speeches; get on with it. Yes, we know BP fucked up. We know they'll pay 'reparations'. We know they'll fix it. So instead of assigning blame (in a way that makes the politicians look like they could actually find their arse with both hands) how about getting on with fixing it?

    me, me, me "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program. And if we become extinct because we don't have a space program, it'll serve us right!" Larry Niven nils illegitimus carborundum

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    It's not like this is some recent phenomenon. There's a killer passage in Herodotus' History where a group of Persian noblemen debate the perfect form of government. Greek-style democracy is briefly considered and quickly eliminated from consideration; the conclusion was that democracy's fatal weakness was that a mob is too easily misled by a capable orator. It was seen as a weak form of government, less capable of dealing with crisis than, say, a dictatorship or oligarchy.

    L u n a t i c F r i n g e

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      It's not like this is some recent phenomenon. There's a killer passage in Herodotus' History where a group of Persian noblemen debate the perfect form of government. Greek-style democracy is briefly considered and quickly eliminated from consideration; the conclusion was that democracy's fatal weakness was that a mob is too easily misled by a capable orator. It was seen as a weak form of government, less capable of dealing with crisis than, say, a dictatorship or oligarchy.

      L u n a t i c F r i n g e

      R Offline
      R Offline
      ragnaroknrol
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      LunaticFringe wrote:

      It was seen as a weak form of government, less capable of dealing with crisis than, say, a dictatorship or oligarchy.

      The main problem with dictatorships is that people don't realize I should be in charge. ;)

      If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R ragnaroknrol

        LunaticFringe wrote:

        It was seen as a weak form of government, less capable of dealing with crisis than, say, a dictatorship or oligarchy.

        The main problem with dictatorships is that people don't realize I should be in charge. ;)

        If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        You're first in line behind me, dude. :-D

        L u n a t i c F r i n g e

        R 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          You're first in line behind me, dude. :-D

          L u n a t i c F r i n g e

          R Offline
          R Offline
          ragnaroknrol
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          How about we share. I want South America, Puerto Rico, Cuba, Spain, and France. You can have the rest. (Mostly I want France so I can have kids with slingshots threaten Paris and have it surrender once a week.)

          If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R R Giskard Reventlov

            I'm listening to this live: at present each member of the committee is allotted time to make an opening statement (several minutes). So far one has yielded her time so as to give more time to the hearings, several others have stuck to the facts. The rest have all made political speeches. What a pack of blow-hards: what is the point: don't make speeches; get on with it. Yes, we know BP fucked up. We know they'll pay 'reparations'. We know they'll fix it. So instead of assigning blame (in a way that makes the politicians look like they could actually find their arse with both hands) how about getting on with fixing it?

            me, me, me "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program. And if we become extinct because we don't have a space program, it'll serve us right!" Larry Niven nils illegitimus carborundum

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            The Associated Press has published this list of how much money members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee have received in political contributions from oil and gas interests since the beginning of 2009, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Contributions are from political action committees run by oil and gas companies and from individuals employed by those companies. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., none John Barrow, D-Ga., $31,500 Joe Barton, R-Texas, $100,470 Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., $33,500 Roy Blunt, R-Mo., $133,100 Mary Bono Mack, R-Calif., $5,750 Rick Boucher, D-Va., $36,000 Bruce Braley, D-Iowa, none Michael Burgess, R-Texas, $39,350 G.K. Butterfield, D-N.C., $19,500 Steve Buyer, R-Ind., $5,000 Lois Capps, D-Calif., none Kathy Castor, D-Fla., none Donna Christian-Christensen, D-Virgin Islands, $1,500 Nathan Deal, R-Ga., none Diana DeGette, D-Colo., $2,250 John D Dingell, D-Mich., $7,000 Mike Doyle, D-Pa., $8,000 Eliot L Engel, D-N.Y., none Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., none Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., $20,500 Charlie A Gonzalez, D-Texas, $30,000 Bart Gordon, D-Tenn., $13,500 Gene Green, D-Texas, $43,500 Ralph M Hall, R-Texas, $31,250 Jane Harman, D-Calif., $3,000 Baron Hill, D-Ind., $2,000 Jay Inslee, D-Wash., none Edward J Markey, D-Mass., $16,000 Jim Matheson, D-Utah, $47,750 Doris O Matsui, D-Calif., $7,500 Jerry McNerney, D-Calif., $3,000 Charles Melancon, D-La., $65,500 Chris Murphy, D-Conn., $6,800 Tim Murphy, R-Pa., $62,950 Sue Myrick, R-N.C., $11,500 Frank Pallone Jr., D-N.J., none Joe Pitts, R-Pa., $18,000 George Radanovich, R-Calif., $14,000 Mike Rogers, R-Mich., $20,400 Mike Ross, D-Ark., $76,950 Bobby L Rush, D-Ill., $1,000 John Sarbanes, D-Md., $3,300 Steve Scalise, R-La., $44,335 Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., none John Shadegg, R-Ariz., $13,400 John M Shimkus, R-Ill., $34,000 Zachary T Space, D-Ohio, $9,600 Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., $1,000 Bart Stupak, D-Mich., $12,000 John Sullivan, R-Okla., $65,250 Betty Sue Sutton, D-Ohio, $6,000 Lee Terry, R-Neb., $30,350 Fred Upton, R-Mich., $22,000 Greg Walden, R-Ore., $31,200 Henry A Waxman, D-Calif., $6,000 Anthony D Weiner, D-N.Y., none Peter Welch, D-Vt., $10,000 Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., $20,500

            L u n a t i c F r i n g e

            R L 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • R ragnaroknrol

              How about we share. I want South America, Puerto Rico, Cuba, Spain, and France. You can have the rest. (Mostly I want France so I can have kids with slingshots threaten Paris and have it surrender once a week.)

              If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              Trying to grab all the beaches? OK, I'll take the South Pacific and everything in it.

              L u n a t i c F r i n g e

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                The Associated Press has published this list of how much money members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee have received in political contributions from oil and gas interests since the beginning of 2009, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Contributions are from political action committees run by oil and gas companies and from individuals employed by those companies. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., none John Barrow, D-Ga., $31,500 Joe Barton, R-Texas, $100,470 Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., $33,500 Roy Blunt, R-Mo., $133,100 Mary Bono Mack, R-Calif., $5,750 Rick Boucher, D-Va., $36,000 Bruce Braley, D-Iowa, none Michael Burgess, R-Texas, $39,350 G.K. Butterfield, D-N.C., $19,500 Steve Buyer, R-Ind., $5,000 Lois Capps, D-Calif., none Kathy Castor, D-Fla., none Donna Christian-Christensen, D-Virgin Islands, $1,500 Nathan Deal, R-Ga., none Diana DeGette, D-Colo., $2,250 John D Dingell, D-Mich., $7,000 Mike Doyle, D-Pa., $8,000 Eliot L Engel, D-N.Y., none Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., none Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., $20,500 Charlie A Gonzalez, D-Texas, $30,000 Bart Gordon, D-Tenn., $13,500 Gene Green, D-Texas, $43,500 Ralph M Hall, R-Texas, $31,250 Jane Harman, D-Calif., $3,000 Baron Hill, D-Ind., $2,000 Jay Inslee, D-Wash., none Edward J Markey, D-Mass., $16,000 Jim Matheson, D-Utah, $47,750 Doris O Matsui, D-Calif., $7,500 Jerry McNerney, D-Calif., $3,000 Charles Melancon, D-La., $65,500 Chris Murphy, D-Conn., $6,800 Tim Murphy, R-Pa., $62,950 Sue Myrick, R-N.C., $11,500 Frank Pallone Jr., D-N.J., none Joe Pitts, R-Pa., $18,000 George Radanovich, R-Calif., $14,000 Mike Rogers, R-Mich., $20,400 Mike Ross, D-Ark., $76,950 Bobby L Rush, D-Ill., $1,000 John Sarbanes, D-Md., $3,300 Steve Scalise, R-La., $44,335 Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., none John Shadegg, R-Ariz., $13,400 John M Shimkus, R-Ill., $34,000 Zachary T Space, D-Ohio, $9,600 Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., $1,000 Bart Stupak, D-Mich., $12,000 John Sullivan, R-Okla., $65,250 Betty Sue Sutton, D-Ohio, $6,000 Lee Terry, R-Neb., $30,350 Fred Upton, R-Mich., $22,000 Greg Walden, R-Ore., $31,200 Henry A Waxman, D-Calif., $6,000 Anthony D Weiner, D-N.Y., none Peter Welch, D-Vt., $10,000 Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., $20,500

                L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                R Offline
                R Offline
                ragnaroknrol
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                Joe Barton, R-Texas, $100,470 Roy Blunt, R-Mo., $133,100 I need to talk to whoever ran these guys' campaigns and run for office.

                If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                L 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  Trying to grab all the beaches? OK, I'll take the South Pacific and everything in it.

                  L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  ragnaroknrol
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  No, just the pretty latina ladies, and Champaign. I have a plan. I may be on a restricted diet (ie married) but it doesn't mean I can't have the menu paraded out to be admired. The beaches and beautiful scenery is just icing on the cake.

                  If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R ragnaroknrol

                    Joe Barton, R-Texas, $100,470 Roy Blunt, R-Mo., $133,100 I need to talk to whoever ran these guys' campaigns and run for office.

                    If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    No shit, huh? So digital_man - was there anything noteworthy from any of these big benificiaries? Or were they among those making speeches and avoiding the real issues?

                    L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R ragnaroknrol

                      Joe Barton, R-Texas, $100,470 Roy Blunt, R-Mo., $133,100 I need to talk to whoever ran these guys' campaigns and run for office.

                      If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      Check it out, rags - I'll answer my own question. So Joe Barton was the single biggest benificiary, right? Here's a quote from the BBC story on the hearing: Congressman Joe Barton, the senior Republican on Mr Waxman's committee, said that while he agreed BP should explain its actions, he was "ashamed" to see the firm being made to set up the compensation fund. BP, he suggested, had been subjected to a "$20bn shakedown" by the Obama administration. Hey, BP gets the representation they pay for! How 'bout that, huh? X|

                      L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        Check it out, rags - I'll answer my own question. So Joe Barton was the single biggest benificiary, right? Here's a quote from the BBC story on the hearing: Congressman Joe Barton, the senior Republican on Mr Waxman's committee, said that while he agreed BP should explain its actions, he was "ashamed" to see the firm being made to set up the compensation fund. BP, he suggested, had been subjected to a "$20bn shakedown" by the Obama administration. Hey, BP gets the representation they pay for! How 'bout that, huh? X|

                        L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        ragnaroknrol
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        So all it takes for me to get a guy that will try to keep me from paying a few billion for a screw up I am ultimately responsible for is 130K? CHEAP! I need that good a return on my investment in my savings account.

                        If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R ragnaroknrol

                          US politicians are about as useful as nipples on a man.

                          If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          RichardM1
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          :-O if you don't think they are useful, search the internet a little. ;P

                          Opacity, the new Transparency.

                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R ragnaroknrol

                            So all it takes for me to get a guy that will try to keep me from paying a few billion for a screw up I am ultimately responsible for is 130K? CHEAP! I need that good a return on my investment in my savings account.

                            If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                            R Offline
                            R Offline
                            RichardM1
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #18

                            I agree with him. They should not be forced to do it without due process. Unreasonable search and seizure, if not from the company, from the stock holders.

                            Opacity, the new Transparency.

                            R 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R RichardM1

                              I agree with him. They should not be forced to do it without due process. Unreasonable search and seizure, if not from the company, from the stock holders.

                              Opacity, the new Transparency.

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              ragnaroknrol
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #19

                              Unreasonable Search and seizure? "Who is using the oil rig?" "Us" "Who is supposed to make sure regulations are followed so spills don't happen?" "Us" "Who screwed up?" "Us" "Well, investigation's done, pay up." The majority of the stock in the company is owned by the company, they like a lot of companies, bought back a huge amount of their stock when GW and the Reps owned Congress and gas prices were at all time highs. As for the other stock holders, tough. Sometimes you lose money when the company you invested in screws up.

                              If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                              R B 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • R RichardM1

                                :-O if you don't think they are useful, search the internet a little. ;P

                                Opacity, the new Transparency.

                                R Offline
                                R Offline
                                ragnaroknrol
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #20

                                So politicians are useful for screwing around with, mocking, attaching clamps to, and twisting violently to get a bit of gratification? I stand by my original comment. :cool:

                                If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                                R 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R R Giskard Reventlov

                                  I'm listening to this live: at present each member of the committee is allotted time to make an opening statement (several minutes). So far one has yielded her time so as to give more time to the hearings, several others have stuck to the facts. The rest have all made political speeches. What a pack of blow-hards: what is the point: don't make speeches; get on with it. Yes, we know BP fucked up. We know they'll pay 'reparations'. We know they'll fix it. So instead of assigning blame (in a way that makes the politicians look like they could actually find their arse with both hands) how about getting on with fixing it?

                                  me, me, me "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program. And if we become extinct because we don't have a space program, it'll serve us right!" Larry Niven nils illegitimus carborundum

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #21

                                  digital man wrote:

                                  (in a way that makes the politicians look like they could actually find their arse with both hands)

                                  As opposed to a mountain rescue team, six Humvees and four motorised search lights (which is what a lot of them need)?

                                  Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]

                                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R ragnaroknrol

                                    So politicians are useful for screwing around with, mocking, attaching clamps to, and twisting violently to get a bit of gratification? I stand by my original comment. :cool:

                                    If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                                    R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    RichardM1
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #22

                                    You are correct! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

                                    Opacity, the new Transparency.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R ragnaroknrol

                                      Unreasonable Search and seizure? "Who is using the oil rig?" "Us" "Who is supposed to make sure regulations are followed so spills don't happen?" "Us" "Who screwed up?" "Us" "Well, investigation's done, pay up." The majority of the stock in the company is owned by the company, they like a lot of companies, bought back a huge amount of their stock when GW and the Reps owned Congress and gas prices were at all time highs. As for the other stock holders, tough. Sometimes you lose money when the company you invested in screws up.

                                      If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                                      R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      RichardM1
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #23

                                      Who want to be judge jury and executioner? ragnaroknrol Who believes in unreasonable seizure? ragnaroknrol Who should we throw in jail for violating the constitution? ragnaroknrol Well, investigations done, go directly to jail. You may not like that it applies in this case, but unless you want me be the one who decides when due process doesn't apply, it applies all the time. And you don't want me to be the one, because due process will immediately be thrown out to put you in jail for un-American thought! :laugh: :laugh:

                                      Opacity, the new Transparency.

                                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L Lost User

                                        The Associated Press has published this list of how much money members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee have received in political contributions from oil and gas interests since the beginning of 2009, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Contributions are from political action committees run by oil and gas companies and from individuals employed by those companies. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., none John Barrow, D-Ga., $31,500 Joe Barton, R-Texas, $100,470 Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., $33,500 Roy Blunt, R-Mo., $133,100 Mary Bono Mack, R-Calif., $5,750 Rick Boucher, D-Va., $36,000 Bruce Braley, D-Iowa, none Michael Burgess, R-Texas, $39,350 G.K. Butterfield, D-N.C., $19,500 Steve Buyer, R-Ind., $5,000 Lois Capps, D-Calif., none Kathy Castor, D-Fla., none Donna Christian-Christensen, D-Virgin Islands, $1,500 Nathan Deal, R-Ga., none Diana DeGette, D-Colo., $2,250 John D Dingell, D-Mich., $7,000 Mike Doyle, D-Pa., $8,000 Eliot L Engel, D-N.Y., none Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., none Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., $20,500 Charlie A Gonzalez, D-Texas, $30,000 Bart Gordon, D-Tenn., $13,500 Gene Green, D-Texas, $43,500 Ralph M Hall, R-Texas, $31,250 Jane Harman, D-Calif., $3,000 Baron Hill, D-Ind., $2,000 Jay Inslee, D-Wash., none Edward J Markey, D-Mass., $16,000 Jim Matheson, D-Utah, $47,750 Doris O Matsui, D-Calif., $7,500 Jerry McNerney, D-Calif., $3,000 Charles Melancon, D-La., $65,500 Chris Murphy, D-Conn., $6,800 Tim Murphy, R-Pa., $62,950 Sue Myrick, R-N.C., $11,500 Frank Pallone Jr., D-N.J., none Joe Pitts, R-Pa., $18,000 George Radanovich, R-Calif., $14,000 Mike Rogers, R-Mich., $20,400 Mike Ross, D-Ark., $76,950 Bobby L Rush, D-Ill., $1,000 John Sarbanes, D-Md., $3,300 Steve Scalise, R-La., $44,335 Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., none John Shadegg, R-Ariz., $13,400 John M Shimkus, R-Ill., $34,000 Zachary T Space, D-Ohio, $9,600 Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., $1,000 Bart Stupak, D-Mich., $12,000 John Sullivan, R-Okla., $65,250 Betty Sue Sutton, D-Ohio, $6,000 Lee Terry, R-Neb., $30,350 Fred Upton, R-Mich., $22,000 Greg Walden, R-Ore., $31,200 Henry A Waxman, D-Calif., $6,000 Anthony D Weiner, D-N.Y., none Peter Welch, D-Vt., $10,000 Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., $20,500

                                        L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                                        L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        Lost User
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #24

                                        When you have a system where senators spend abotu a third of their time trying to get funds for the party business is going to control them.

                                        Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]

                                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R ragnaroknrol

                                          Unreasonable Search and seizure? "Who is using the oil rig?" "Us" "Who is supposed to make sure regulations are followed so spills don't happen?" "Us" "Who screwed up?" "Us" "Well, investigation's done, pay up." The majority of the stock in the company is owned by the company, they like a lot of companies, bought back a huge amount of their stock when GW and the Reps owned Congress and gas prices were at all time highs. As for the other stock holders, tough. Sometimes you lose money when the company you invested in screws up.

                                          If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                                          B Offline
                                          B Offline
                                          Bergholt Stuttley Johnson
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #25

                                          "Who is using the oil rig?" "well BP pay a US firm to drill and run the rig so day to day its not BP" "Who is supposed to make sure regulations are followed so spills don't happen?" "the US Govenment, the rig operators " "Who screwed up?" "Us - how about the safty device maker whose product failed all three backup systems, the rig operators, the Govenment inspectors" "Well, investigation's done, pay up." Yes BP is responsible as part owner of the well and admits that (more than the US partners have done) on one side we have BP being open and fair and on the other we have the US operator of the rig trying toget a court to limit thier fiscal liabilities to $27million (despite already get $400million+ paidout in insurance on the rig) its not that BP shouldnt pay its that they are getting the blame before it is known what exactly caused the spill, whilst the other companies involved are getting away scot free. a few points 1, BP had the same requipment fitted and had the same procedures in place regarding an incident of this type as did ALL the other Oil companies. 2, BP is a US based company (yes the HQ is in London but more BP employee's work in houston alone than work in the UK) and ownership is spilt fairely equally 40%Uk 39%US 3, the rig owners are responsible for 75% of all Gulf incidents eyt are regarded as the premiure deep water drillers 4, from prelimmary investigations (note thst tese are not yet complete) it would seem that BP have not done anything that is not regarded as SOP in gulf operations, even the alledged "short cuts" were accepted procedures withing the business (not saying its right just that its SOP) 5, compare this with Bhopal, BP have already paid out more in compensation than Union Carbine have and which would you say was the bigger diaster an oil spill and 11 lives or 15000 lives? I wouldnt like to be an american company abroad who has an accident, this has set a precident that is going to be well used against them (there is already talk of going back after the Exxon comapny for the Exxon valdez based on what is being done angaisnt BP (oh and piper alpha, the nigrian spill and a good few others where US companies used the law to avoid responsibility)

                                          You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start

                                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups