Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Congressional Hearings

Congressional Hearings

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
helpquestioncomjson
47 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    R Giskard Reventlov
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I'm listening to this live: at present each member of the committee is allotted time to make an opening statement (several minutes). So far one has yielded her time so as to give more time to the hearings, several others have stuck to the facts. The rest have all made political speeches. What a pack of blow-hards: what is the point: don't make speeches; get on with it. Yes, we know BP fucked up. We know they'll pay 'reparations'. We know they'll fix it. So instead of assigning blame (in a way that makes the politicians look like they could actually find their arse with both hands) how about getting on with fixing it?

    me, me, me "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program. And if we become extinct because we don't have a space program, it'll serve us right!" Larry Niven nils illegitimus carborundum

    L J 5 Replies Last reply
    0
    • R R Giskard Reventlov

      I'm listening to this live: at present each member of the committee is allotted time to make an opening statement (several minutes). So far one has yielded her time so as to give more time to the hearings, several others have stuck to the facts. The rest have all made political speeches. What a pack of blow-hards: what is the point: don't make speeches; get on with it. Yes, we know BP fucked up. We know they'll pay 'reparations'. We know they'll fix it. So instead of assigning blame (in a way that makes the politicians look like they could actually find their arse with both hands) how about getting on with fixing it?

      me, me, me "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program. And if we become extinct because we don't have a space program, it'll serve us right!" Larry Niven nils illegitimus carborundum

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      digital man wrote:

      don't make speeches; get on with it.

      Why do you think they became politicians?

      It's time for a new signature.

      R R 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        digital man wrote:

        don't make speeches; get on with it.

        Why do you think they became politicians?

        It's time for a new signature.

        R Offline
        R Offline
        R Giskard Reventlov
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Richard MacCutchan wrote:

        Why do you think they became politicians?

        Sigh: yes, I know.

        me, me, me "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program. And if we become extinct because we don't have a space program, it'll serve us right!" Larry Niven nils illegitimus carborundum

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          digital man wrote:

          don't make speeches; get on with it.

          Why do you think they became politicians?

          It's time for a new signature.

          R Offline
          R Offline
          ragnaroknrol
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          US politicians are about as useful as nipples on a man.

          If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

          R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R R Giskard Reventlov

            I'm listening to this live: at present each member of the committee is allotted time to make an opening statement (several minutes). So far one has yielded her time so as to give more time to the hearings, several others have stuck to the facts. The rest have all made political speeches. What a pack of blow-hards: what is the point: don't make speeches; get on with it. Yes, we know BP fucked up. We know they'll pay 'reparations'. We know they'll fix it. So instead of assigning blame (in a way that makes the politicians look like they could actually find their arse with both hands) how about getting on with fixing it?

            me, me, me "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program. And if we become extinct because we don't have a space program, it'll serve us right!" Larry Niven nils illegitimus carborundum

            J Offline
            J Offline
            josda1000
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Hear hear! Totally agreed.

            Josh Davis
            Always looking for blackjack. Or maybe White Frank. One of the two.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R R Giskard Reventlov

              I'm listening to this live: at present each member of the committee is allotted time to make an opening statement (several minutes). So far one has yielded her time so as to give more time to the hearings, several others have stuck to the facts. The rest have all made political speeches. What a pack of blow-hards: what is the point: don't make speeches; get on with it. Yes, we know BP fucked up. We know they'll pay 'reparations'. We know they'll fix it. So instead of assigning blame (in a way that makes the politicians look like they could actually find their arse with both hands) how about getting on with fixing it?

              me, me, me "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program. And if we become extinct because we don't have a space program, it'll serve us right!" Larry Niven nils illegitimus carborundum

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              It's not like this is some recent phenomenon. There's a killer passage in Herodotus' History where a group of Persian noblemen debate the perfect form of government. Greek-style democracy is briefly considered and quickly eliminated from consideration; the conclusion was that democracy's fatal weakness was that a mob is too easily misled by a capable orator. It was seen as a weak form of government, less capable of dealing with crisis than, say, a dictatorship or oligarchy.

              L u n a t i c F r i n g e

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                It's not like this is some recent phenomenon. There's a killer passage in Herodotus' History where a group of Persian noblemen debate the perfect form of government. Greek-style democracy is briefly considered and quickly eliminated from consideration; the conclusion was that democracy's fatal weakness was that a mob is too easily misled by a capable orator. It was seen as a weak form of government, less capable of dealing with crisis than, say, a dictatorship or oligarchy.

                L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                R Offline
                R Offline
                ragnaroknrol
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                LunaticFringe wrote:

                It was seen as a weak form of government, less capable of dealing with crisis than, say, a dictatorship or oligarchy.

                The main problem with dictatorships is that people don't realize I should be in charge. ;)

                If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R ragnaroknrol

                  LunaticFringe wrote:

                  It was seen as a weak form of government, less capable of dealing with crisis than, say, a dictatorship or oligarchy.

                  The main problem with dictatorships is that people don't realize I should be in charge. ;)

                  If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  You're first in line behind me, dude. :-D

                  L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    You're first in line behind me, dude. :-D

                    L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    ragnaroknrol
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    How about we share. I want South America, Puerto Rico, Cuba, Spain, and France. You can have the rest. (Mostly I want France so I can have kids with slingshots threaten Paris and have it surrender once a week.)

                    If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R R Giskard Reventlov

                      I'm listening to this live: at present each member of the committee is allotted time to make an opening statement (several minutes). So far one has yielded her time so as to give more time to the hearings, several others have stuck to the facts. The rest have all made political speeches. What a pack of blow-hards: what is the point: don't make speeches; get on with it. Yes, we know BP fucked up. We know they'll pay 'reparations'. We know they'll fix it. So instead of assigning blame (in a way that makes the politicians look like they could actually find their arse with both hands) how about getting on with fixing it?

                      me, me, me "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program. And if we become extinct because we don't have a space program, it'll serve us right!" Larry Niven nils illegitimus carborundum

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      The Associated Press has published this list of how much money members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee have received in political contributions from oil and gas interests since the beginning of 2009, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Contributions are from political action committees run by oil and gas companies and from individuals employed by those companies. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., none John Barrow, D-Ga., $31,500 Joe Barton, R-Texas, $100,470 Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., $33,500 Roy Blunt, R-Mo., $133,100 Mary Bono Mack, R-Calif., $5,750 Rick Boucher, D-Va., $36,000 Bruce Braley, D-Iowa, none Michael Burgess, R-Texas, $39,350 G.K. Butterfield, D-N.C., $19,500 Steve Buyer, R-Ind., $5,000 Lois Capps, D-Calif., none Kathy Castor, D-Fla., none Donna Christian-Christensen, D-Virgin Islands, $1,500 Nathan Deal, R-Ga., none Diana DeGette, D-Colo., $2,250 John D Dingell, D-Mich., $7,000 Mike Doyle, D-Pa., $8,000 Eliot L Engel, D-N.Y., none Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., none Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., $20,500 Charlie A Gonzalez, D-Texas, $30,000 Bart Gordon, D-Tenn., $13,500 Gene Green, D-Texas, $43,500 Ralph M Hall, R-Texas, $31,250 Jane Harman, D-Calif., $3,000 Baron Hill, D-Ind., $2,000 Jay Inslee, D-Wash., none Edward J Markey, D-Mass., $16,000 Jim Matheson, D-Utah, $47,750 Doris O Matsui, D-Calif., $7,500 Jerry McNerney, D-Calif., $3,000 Charles Melancon, D-La., $65,500 Chris Murphy, D-Conn., $6,800 Tim Murphy, R-Pa., $62,950 Sue Myrick, R-N.C., $11,500 Frank Pallone Jr., D-N.J., none Joe Pitts, R-Pa., $18,000 George Radanovich, R-Calif., $14,000 Mike Rogers, R-Mich., $20,400 Mike Ross, D-Ark., $76,950 Bobby L Rush, D-Ill., $1,000 John Sarbanes, D-Md., $3,300 Steve Scalise, R-La., $44,335 Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., none John Shadegg, R-Ariz., $13,400 John M Shimkus, R-Ill., $34,000 Zachary T Space, D-Ohio, $9,600 Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., $1,000 Bart Stupak, D-Mich., $12,000 John Sullivan, R-Okla., $65,250 Betty Sue Sutton, D-Ohio, $6,000 Lee Terry, R-Neb., $30,350 Fred Upton, R-Mich., $22,000 Greg Walden, R-Ore., $31,200 Henry A Waxman, D-Calif., $6,000 Anthony D Weiner, D-N.Y., none Peter Welch, D-Vt., $10,000 Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., $20,500

                      L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                      R L 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • R ragnaroknrol

                        How about we share. I want South America, Puerto Rico, Cuba, Spain, and France. You can have the rest. (Mostly I want France so I can have kids with slingshots threaten Paris and have it surrender once a week.)

                        If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Trying to grab all the beaches? OK, I'll take the South Pacific and everything in it.

                        L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          The Associated Press has published this list of how much money members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee have received in political contributions from oil and gas interests since the beginning of 2009, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Contributions are from political action committees run by oil and gas companies and from individuals employed by those companies. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., none John Barrow, D-Ga., $31,500 Joe Barton, R-Texas, $100,470 Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., $33,500 Roy Blunt, R-Mo., $133,100 Mary Bono Mack, R-Calif., $5,750 Rick Boucher, D-Va., $36,000 Bruce Braley, D-Iowa, none Michael Burgess, R-Texas, $39,350 G.K. Butterfield, D-N.C., $19,500 Steve Buyer, R-Ind., $5,000 Lois Capps, D-Calif., none Kathy Castor, D-Fla., none Donna Christian-Christensen, D-Virgin Islands, $1,500 Nathan Deal, R-Ga., none Diana DeGette, D-Colo., $2,250 John D Dingell, D-Mich., $7,000 Mike Doyle, D-Pa., $8,000 Eliot L Engel, D-N.Y., none Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., none Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., $20,500 Charlie A Gonzalez, D-Texas, $30,000 Bart Gordon, D-Tenn., $13,500 Gene Green, D-Texas, $43,500 Ralph M Hall, R-Texas, $31,250 Jane Harman, D-Calif., $3,000 Baron Hill, D-Ind., $2,000 Jay Inslee, D-Wash., none Edward J Markey, D-Mass., $16,000 Jim Matheson, D-Utah, $47,750 Doris O Matsui, D-Calif., $7,500 Jerry McNerney, D-Calif., $3,000 Charles Melancon, D-La., $65,500 Chris Murphy, D-Conn., $6,800 Tim Murphy, R-Pa., $62,950 Sue Myrick, R-N.C., $11,500 Frank Pallone Jr., D-N.J., none Joe Pitts, R-Pa., $18,000 George Radanovich, R-Calif., $14,000 Mike Rogers, R-Mich., $20,400 Mike Ross, D-Ark., $76,950 Bobby L Rush, D-Ill., $1,000 John Sarbanes, D-Md., $3,300 Steve Scalise, R-La., $44,335 Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., none John Shadegg, R-Ariz., $13,400 John M Shimkus, R-Ill., $34,000 Zachary T Space, D-Ohio, $9,600 Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., $1,000 Bart Stupak, D-Mich., $12,000 John Sullivan, R-Okla., $65,250 Betty Sue Sutton, D-Ohio, $6,000 Lee Terry, R-Neb., $30,350 Fred Upton, R-Mich., $22,000 Greg Walden, R-Ore., $31,200 Henry A Waxman, D-Calif., $6,000 Anthony D Weiner, D-N.Y., none Peter Welch, D-Vt., $10,000 Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., $20,500

                          L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          ragnaroknrol
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Joe Barton, R-Texas, $100,470 Roy Blunt, R-Mo., $133,100 I need to talk to whoever ran these guys' campaigns and run for office.

                          If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                          L 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • R ragnaroknrol

                            Joe Barton, R-Texas, $100,470 Roy Blunt, R-Mo., $133,100 I need to talk to whoever ran these guys' campaigns and run for office.

                            If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            No shit, huh? So digital_man - was there anything noteworthy from any of these big benificiaries? Or were they among those making speeches and avoiding the real issues?

                            L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              Trying to grab all the beaches? OK, I'll take the South Pacific and everything in it.

                              L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              ragnaroknrol
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              No, just the pretty latina ladies, and Champaign. I have a plan. I may be on a restricted diet (ie married) but it doesn't mean I can't have the menu paraded out to be admired. The beaches and beautiful scenery is just icing on the cake.

                              If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R ragnaroknrol

                                Joe Barton, R-Texas, $100,470 Roy Blunt, R-Mo., $133,100 I need to talk to whoever ran these guys' campaigns and run for office.

                                If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lost User
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Check it out, rags - I'll answer my own question. So Joe Barton was the single biggest benificiary, right? Here's a quote from the BBC story on the hearing: Congressman Joe Barton, the senior Republican on Mr Waxman's committee, said that while he agreed BP should explain its actions, he was "ashamed" to see the firm being made to set up the compensation fund. BP, he suggested, had been subjected to a "$20bn shakedown" by the Obama administration. Hey, BP gets the representation they pay for! How 'bout that, huh? X|

                                L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                                R 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Lost User

                                  Check it out, rags - I'll answer my own question. So Joe Barton was the single biggest benificiary, right? Here's a quote from the BBC story on the hearing: Congressman Joe Barton, the senior Republican on Mr Waxman's committee, said that while he agreed BP should explain its actions, he was "ashamed" to see the firm being made to set up the compensation fund. BP, he suggested, had been subjected to a "$20bn shakedown" by the Obama administration. Hey, BP gets the representation they pay for! How 'bout that, huh? X|

                                  L u n a t i c F r i n g e

                                  R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  ragnaroknrol
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  So all it takes for me to get a guy that will try to keep me from paying a few billion for a screw up I am ultimately responsible for is 130K? CHEAP! I need that good a return on my investment in my savings account.

                                  If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R ragnaroknrol

                                    US politicians are about as useful as nipples on a man.

                                    If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                                    R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    RichardM1
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    :-O if you don't think they are useful, search the internet a little. ;P

                                    Opacity, the new Transparency.

                                    R 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R ragnaroknrol

                                      So all it takes for me to get a guy that will try to keep me from paying a few billion for a screw up I am ultimately responsible for is 130K? CHEAP! I need that good a return on my investment in my savings account.

                                      If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                                      R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      RichardM1
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      I agree with him. They should not be forced to do it without due process. Unreasonable search and seizure, if not from the company, from the stock holders.

                                      Opacity, the new Transparency.

                                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R RichardM1

                                        I agree with him. They should not be forced to do it without due process. Unreasonable search and seizure, if not from the company, from the stock holders.

                                        Opacity, the new Transparency.

                                        R Offline
                                        R Offline
                                        ragnaroknrol
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        Unreasonable Search and seizure? "Who is using the oil rig?" "Us" "Who is supposed to make sure regulations are followed so spills don't happen?" "Us" "Who screwed up?" "Us" "Well, investigation's done, pay up." The majority of the stock in the company is owned by the company, they like a lot of companies, bought back a huge amount of their stock when GW and the Reps owned Congress and gas prices were at all time highs. As for the other stock holders, tough. Sometimes you lose money when the company you invested in screws up.

                                        If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                                        R B 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R RichardM1

                                          :-O if you don't think they are useful, search the internet a little. ;P

                                          Opacity, the new Transparency.

                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          ragnaroknrol
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          So politicians are useful for screwing around with, mocking, attaching clamps to, and twisting violently to get a bit of gratification? I stand by my original comment. :cool:

                                          If I have accidentally said something witty, smart, or correct, it is purely by mistake and I apologize for it.

                                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups