Last months excitement over arctic sea ice turns out to be unjustified
-
http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/seaice/extent/AMSRE_Sea_Ice_Extent_L.png[^] The AGW crowd got so excited because th eline went below all the rest last month. Only to gain ground this month. As for the antarctic: http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.recent.antarctic.png[^] Yep, sea ice increasing as before. If it doesnt stop the south west passage might get blocked! :)
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/seaice/extent/AMSRE_Sea_Ice_Extent_L.png[^] The AGW crowd got so excited because th eline went below all the rest last month. Only to gain ground this month. As for the antarctic: http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.recent.antarctic.png[^] Yep, sea ice increasing as before. If it doesnt stop the south west passage might get blocked! :)
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
Yes, since last month a five year long study has concluded that the screamers are in fact, full of crap. The study, having only been launched three weeks ago, is the fastest five year study on record. Really, can we stop the wankst over data points and actually look at long term patterns to see if there are problems or not?
-
Yes, since last month a five year long study has concluded that the screamers are in fact, full of crap. The study, having only been launched three weeks ago, is the fastest five year study on record. Really, can we stop the wankst over data points and actually look at long term patterns to see if there are problems or not?
Distind wrote:
Really, can we stop the wankst over data points and actually look at long term patterns to see if there are problems or not?
I wish we alll could.... :( So, lets begin with raw station temperature data http://www.john-daly.com/stations/stations.htm[^]. Of particular interest are the arctic and antarctic, since these should warm the most. (According to AGW theory) What you will see is that the antarctic is cooling, and the arctic warming. But its not as warm as it was in the 1930's/40's.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/seaice/extent/AMSRE_Sea_Ice_Extent_L.png[^] The AGW crowd got so excited because th eline went below all the rest last month. Only to gain ground this month. As for the antarctic: http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.recent.antarctic.png[^] Yep, sea ice increasing as before. If it doesnt stop the south west passage might get blocked! :)
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
You're reaching CSS levels of posting here for your AGW crap.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
-
You're reaching CSS levels of posting here for your AGW crap.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
-
Distind wrote:
Really, can we stop the wankst over data points and actually look at long term patterns to see if there are problems or not?
I wish we alll could.... :( So, lets begin with raw station temperature data http://www.john-daly.com/stations/stations.htm[^]. Of particular interest are the arctic and antarctic, since these should warm the most. (According to AGW theory) What you will see is that the antarctic is cooling, and the arctic warming. But its not as warm as it was in the 1930's/40's.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
wolfbinary wrote:
You're reaching CSS levels of posting here for your AGW crap.
You can always ignore it. Unless of course you actually find it offensive. In which case I would like to know why?
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
fat_boy wrote:
Unless of course you actually find it offensive.
Can't recall your posts ever being defensive, so waddya want to be called - innocuous or offensive? :)
Bob Emmett New Eugenicist - The weekly magazine for intelligent parenting. Published by the New World Order Press.
-
fat_boy wrote:
Unless of course you actually find it offensive.
Can't recall your posts ever being defensive, so waddya want to be called - innocuous or offensive? :)
Bob Emmett New Eugenicist - The weekly magazine for intelligent parenting. Published by the New World Order Press.
