GW undeniable report. As an experiement I would like to see if people see any problems with this.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
I haven't seen one real piece of software from him yet.
And why does that matter if he does or does not publish his work?
He can collect random bits of information be he can't build anything.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
How are you going about learning Japanese?
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
-
He can collect random bits of information be he can't build anything.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
Nowadays I pretty much use Mathematica and LaTeX, which don't lend themselves well to publishing on this site. I'm also going to learn Scilab.
-
Excuuuuse me bit I happen to like Star Trek and I'm not, well, er, well, you know what I mean, sort of, anyway...
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me
I'm not saying that Star Trek is bad (I obviously don't know) but rather I was reversing his insult, at least in his eyes.
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
No, but it seemed pointless arguing with you when you cannot understand the difference between the French Meaning and the English. All you provided was an etymology of the word. Despite what it's origins were in the French language, it still has other meanings in English. This is why English is the largest language.
Dalek Dave wrote:
seemed
Semble.
Dalek Dave wrote:
difference
Difference.
Dalek Dave wrote:
provided
Provision.
Dalek Dave wrote:
origins
Origine.
Dalek Dave wrote:
language
Langue. And then we come to jejune, which David decides does NOT maintain its meaning as do all the other French derived words he just used. Instead he gives and entirely NEW erroneous meaning. What other words have you changed the meaning of then? Do you intend to do this to others in the future? Perhaps you could redefine 'language' as a sexual position? Dunno, just a hint. :laugh:
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
I did not give it it's meanings, they were there for me to freely use.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
-
I did not give it it's meanings, they were there for me to freely use.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
-
I want to tackle this form another angle. Here is s typical AGW report. I would like to know if other people, specifically those hwo support AGW see any errors or problems in it. http://content.usatoday.com/communities/greenhouse/post/2010/07/global-warming-undeniable/1[^]
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
fat_boy wrote:
Here is s typical AGW report.
No, it's a summary article. The actual report is linked in the article. You wouldn't accept hearsay in a courtroom so why are you so persistently uncritical of secondary sources and summaries as it pertains to AGW? Being too lazy to read the 218 page report (or not understanding it) is no excuse. It's hypocritical on one hand to dismiss climate science as being unscientific and on the other hand demonstrate absolutely no scientific rigor in your approach to it. Go ahead - read the actual report. Quote sections from it. Analyze it. Refute their cited research with cited research of your own or alternative peer-reviewed expert interpretations of the cited research. That would qualify as legitimate scientific discourse. Not that I think for a minute you're actually interested in doing that - you're just here to yell your opinion as loud as you can and see what comes out of the woodwork. Right?
- F
-
Yeah right, I haven't seen one real piece of software from him yet. Just a bunch of random facts from wikipedia.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
Let me get this straight, he can't speak/read Japanese because he hasn't produced any software and he can't be intelligent because he uses long words. And you're totally not jealous, and that totally wasn't the motivation to attack someone who had said absolutely nothing about you.
-
Thanks. I have some books and any thing I can get from others is appreciated.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
-
Thanks. I have some books and any thing I can get from others is appreciated.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
Make sure you download the example sentence database (http://wakan.manga.cz/files/examples_j_pkg.zip[^]). It's enormously useful.
-
fat_boy wrote:
Here is s typical AGW report.
No, it's a summary article. The actual report is linked in the article. You wouldn't accept hearsay in a courtroom so why are you so persistently uncritical of secondary sources and summaries as it pertains to AGW? Being too lazy to read the 218 page report (or not understanding it) is no excuse. It's hypocritical on one hand to dismiss climate science as being unscientific and on the other hand demonstrate absolutely no scientific rigor in your approach to it. Go ahead - read the actual report. Quote sections from it. Analyze it. Refute their cited research with cited research of your own or alternative peer-reviewed expert interpretations of the cited research. That would qualify as legitimate scientific discourse. Not that I think for a minute you're actually interested in doing that - you're just here to yell your opinion as loud as you can and see what comes out of the woodwork. Right?
- F
Fisticuffs wrote:
The actual report is linked in the article.
I was hoping someone would notice that and actualy read the full report, its more interesting.
Fisticuffs wrote:
Right?
Actually I am interested in what people like you have to say about the details of the report.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
I want to tackle this form another angle. Here is s typical AGW report. I would like to know if other people, specifically those hwo support AGW see any errors or problems in it. http://content.usatoday.com/communities/greenhouse/post/2010/07/global-warming-undeniable/1[^]
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
It's a perfect example of why journalists shouldn't be trusted for science. Odds are the word undeniable applies to a single aspect of the report, which is most likely truly undeniable, but probably flew clear over this writer's head. If you're going to bitch about it read the reports, find the faults there and take up those issues. Some idiot reporter taking a word and dancing with it means nothing scientifically, neither does bitching about what they said. If you want to do something, actually go through the real report and show that it is wrong. Or if you want to do something marginally constructive, go through the report and detail what exactly was described as undeniable and disclose the irresponsible and idiotic reporting which takes place over scientific articles(miniature black holes anyone?). But what you're doing now accomplishes nothing but spamming another global warming thread.
-
Let me get this straight, he can't speak/read Japanese because he hasn't produced any software and he can't be intelligent because he uses long words. And you're totally not jealous, and that totally wasn't the motivation to attack someone who had said absolutely nothing about you.
He's both a conspiracy theorist and a dimwit - contrary evidence only strengthens his beliefs.
-
Phhh, like you actually know how to communicate in Japanese. The only thing you know is words and phrases you have memorized. Pathetic, real pathetic.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
He watches this, over and over... The Vapors - Turning Japanese[^].
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me
-
Yeah right, I haven't seen one real piece of software from him yet. Just a bunch of random facts from wikipedia.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
ust a bunch of random facts from wikipedia.
Beats a bunch of random lies from DimboWars, though. (And the cutting and pasting of other people's work.)
Bob Emmett New Eugenicist - The weekly magazine for intelligent parenting. Published by the New World Order Press.
-
Fisticuffs wrote:
The actual report is linked in the article.
I was hoping someone would notice that and actualy read the full report, its more interesting.
Fisticuffs wrote:
Right?
Actually I am interested in what people like you have to say about the details of the report.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
fat_boy wrote:
Actually I am interested in what people like you have to say about the details of the report.
Sure, I'll give it a read - it'll probably take awhile. Do you have any suggestions for chapters that are particularly worthwhile to scrutinize?
- F
-
He watches this, over and over... The Vapors - Turning Japanese[^].
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me