Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. GW undeniable report. As an experiement I would like to see if people see any problems with this.

GW undeniable report. As an experiement I would like to see if people see any problems with this.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comlounge
47 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    I want to tackle this form another angle. Here is s typical AGW report. I would like to know if other people, specifically those hwo support AGW see any errors or problems in it. http://content.usatoday.com/communities/greenhouse/post/2010/07/global-warming-undeniable/1[^]

    Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

    D Offline
    D Offline
    Distind
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    It's a perfect example of why journalists shouldn't be trusted for science. Odds are the word undeniable applies to a single aspect of the report, which is most likely truly undeniable, but probably flew clear over this writer's head. If you're going to bitch about it read the reports, find the faults there and take up those issues. Some idiot reporter taking a word and dancing with it means nothing scientifically, neither does bitching about what they said. If you want to do something, actually go through the real report and show that it is wrong. Or if you want to do something marginally constructive, go through the report and detail what exactly was described as undeniable and disclose the irresponsible and idiotic reporting which takes place over scientific articles(miniature black holes anyone?). But what you're doing now accomplishes nothing but spamming another global warming thread.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D Distind

      Let me get this straight, he can't speak/read Japanese because he hasn't produced any software and he can't be intelligent because he uses long words. And you're totally not jealous, and that totally wasn't the motivation to attack someone who had said absolutely nothing about you.

      S Offline
      S Offline
      soap brain
      wrote on last edited by
      #42

      He's both a conspiracy theorist and a dimwit - contrary evidence only strengthens his beliefs.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C CaptainSeeSharp

        Phhh, like you actually know how to communicate in Japanese. The only thing you know is words and phrases you have memorized. Pathetic, real pathetic.

        Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #43

        CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

        The only thing you know is words and phrases you have memorized

        Which is how you speak english.

        Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R R Giskard Reventlov

          He watches this, over and over... The Vapors - Turning Japanese[^].

          "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #44

          Aparently that song is about masturbation.

          Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C CaptainSeeSharp

            Yeah right, I haven't seen one real piece of software from him yet. Just a bunch of random facts from wikipedia.

            Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #45

            CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

            ust a bunch of random facts from wikipedia.

            Beats a bunch of random lies from DimboWars, though. (And the cutting and pasting of other people's work.)

            Bob Emmett New Eugenicist - The weekly magazine for intelligent parenting. Published by the New World Order Press.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Fisticuffs wrote:

              The actual report is linked in the article.

              I was hoping someone would notice that and actualy read the full report, its more interesting.

              Fisticuffs wrote:

              Right?

              Actually I am interested in what people like you have to say about the details of the report.

              Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #46

              fat_boy wrote:

              Actually I am interested in what people like you have to say about the details of the report.

              Sure, I'll give it a read - it'll probably take awhile. Do you have any suggestions for chapters that are particularly worthwhile to scrutinize?

              - F

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R R Giskard Reventlov

                He watches this, over and over... The Vapors - Turning Japanese[^].

                "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me

                R Offline
                R Offline
                RichardM1
                wrote on last edited by
                #47

                :laugh: you'd get a 5,if I could! :laugh:

                Opacity, the new Transparency.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • World
                • Users
                • Groups