Gee, I wonder what GW is going to do to the place?
-
A. Who or what is the official that legislates definitions? :) B. You missed the :laugh: or you have no sense of humor. C. An official definition of moron: "Moron" was coined in 1910 by psychologist Henry H. Goddard from the Ancient Greek word μωρός (moros), which meant "dull" (as opposed to "sharp"), and used to describe a person with a mental age in adulthood of between 8 and 12 on the Binet scale. It was once applied to people with an IQ of 51-70, being superior in one degree to "imbecile" (IQ of 26-50) and superior in two degrees to "idiot" (IQ of 0-25). Since my mental age on the Binet scale is greater than 12 and my IQ is substantially higher than 70, I'm not a moron. Of course you may have some unofficial definition, but that does not count according to you. So either accept it or be deemed an "idiot". ;P
Regards David R --------------------------------------------------------------- "Every program eventually becomes rococo, and then rubble." - Alan Perlis The only valid measurement of code quality: WTFs/minute.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
f*** off
Again you show your towering intelect, a shining wit.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
-
I gave the official definition moron. Computer giberish that Bill Gates made up do not count as words.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
...
I am a Software Engineer.[^] But one, alas, to whom common computing terms are Computer Giberish[sic]. But, for $5 an hour what do you expect? It's all gibberish to him.
Bob Emmett "Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?" -Charles Babbage, Passages from the Life of a Philosopher
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
f*** off
Again you show your towering intelect, a shining wit.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
-
Bob Emmett wrote:
You merely plagiarise others' efforts[^],
You are a fucking idiot. Just who did I plagiarize that from? You can't imagine your highness creating something like that. I am superior to you in every way old man. You are almost dead.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
-
Bob Emmett wrote:
You merely plagiarise others' efforts[^],
You are a fucking idiot. Just who did I plagiarize that from? You can't imagine your highness creating something like that. I am superior to you in every way old man. You are almost dead.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Just who did I plagiarize that from?
There are hundreds of 2d frameworks out there, you tell me which it was. Example code from "Learn C# in 5 seconds", possibly? The A* Path Finding algorithm is as old as the hills.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
You can't imagine your highness creating something like that.
True, true, quite beneath me. My AI and path finding programming was for the real world: production scheduling and control software. You know, running factories: machine assembly, semiconductor fabrication, metal rolling, that sort of thing. Great for the paperless office, too.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
I am superior to you in every way old man.
Let me see. Me at 23: Programming Team Leader, great future in IT ahead of me. You at 23: Burger flipper, with every prospect of remaining one. Yes, superior in every way. :rolleyes:
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
You are almost dead.
True. If I live as long as my father, I have 19 years left. If I live as long as my mother, I have 1 year left. But you are a druggie, and could OD tomorrow.
Bob Emmett "Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?" -Charles Babbage, Passages from the Life of a Philosopher
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Just who did I plagiarize that from?
There are hundreds of 2d frameworks out there, you tell me which it was. Example code from "Learn C# in 5 seconds", possibly? The A* Path Finding algorithm is as old as the hills.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
You can't imagine your highness creating something like that.
True, true, quite beneath me. My AI and path finding programming was for the real world: production scheduling and control software. You know, running factories: machine assembly, semiconductor fabrication, metal rolling, that sort of thing. Great for the paperless office, too.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
I am superior to you in every way old man.
Let me see. Me at 23: Programming Team Leader, great future in IT ahead of me. You at 23: Burger flipper, with every prospect of remaining one. Yes, superior in every way. :rolleyes:
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
You are almost dead.
True. If I live as long as my father, I have 19 years left. If I live as long as my mother, I have 1 year left. But you are a druggie, and could OD tomorrow.
Bob Emmett "Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?" -Charles Babbage, Passages from the Life of a Philosopher
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
Yeah, but I bet he has friends.
... and a more active sex life, too! (So much to do, so little time. :) )
Bob Emmett "Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?" -Charles Babbage, Passages from the Life of a Philosopher
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
Yeah, but I bet he has friends.
... and a more active sex life, too! (So much to do, so little time. :) )
Bob Emmett "Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?" -Charles Babbage, Passages from the Life of a Philosopher
Bob Emmett wrote:
... and a more active sex life, too!
Thats not saying much as so has the Pope
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
-
This one, though it does seem to resemble another recent argument. You're claiming that to be a "global phenomenon", it has to affect everything. I'm saying it only indicates that the effect is in multiple parts of the globe, instead of confined to one region.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)Well thats a pretty slack deffinition of global. How about if there were floods in two parts of the world, would you call that global? Or an outbreak of foot an mouth disease, would you call it global? How about inside a country. If two counties in England had outbreaks of foot and mouth would you call that national?
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
fat_boy wrote:
Take a gues since we are tlaking about scotish temperatures...
So human recorded history = Scottish recoded history? That's what I mean - you make broad sweeping statements that when challenged you have to retract. BTW is there a temperature record that stretches back to the beginning of even Scottish recorded history?
fat_boy wrote:
Didnt say you did. I heard/read it on/in the media.
Then why raise it? It's just another diversion that adds nothing.
Regards David R --------------------------------------------------------------- "Every program eventually becomes rococo, and then rubble." - Alan Perlis The only valid measurement of code quality: WTFs/minute.
riced wrote:
So human recorded history = Scottish recoded history?
Oh come on, first I stated Scottish, and you said is that for ever, I said no, within human history, and now you claim I have stated human history equals scottish history. Dont be such a wazzuk.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
riced wrote:
So human recorded history = Scottish recoded history?
Oh come on, first I stated Scottish, and you said is that for ever, I said no, within human history, and now you claim I have stated human history equals scottish history. Dont be such a wazzuk.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
fat_boy wrote:
and you said is that for ever
No - you said (as in the coldest EVER) (you even emphasized it by using capitals), I just pointed out that this was an exaggeration. Somewhat similar to claims in previous threads, e.g. that we had "centuries" of weather balloon data that should be preferred to satellite data. Given your tendency to berate various people for inaccuracies (you generally refer to them as lies) it seems reasonable to call you to account.
Regards David R --------------------------------------------------------------- "Every program eventually becomes rococo, and then rubble." - Alan Perlis The only valid measurement of code quality: WTFs/minute.
-
Well thats a pretty slack deffinition of global. How about if there were floods in two parts of the world, would you call that global? Or an outbreak of foot an mouth disease, would you call it global? How about inside a country. If two counties in England had outbreaks of foot and mouth would you call that national?
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
fat_boy wrote:
How about if there were floods in two parts of the world, would you call that global?
Two? Probably not. Three or four, if they might be related in terms of cause? Sure.
fat_boy wrote:
Or an outbreak of foot an mouth disease, would you call it global?
H1N1 was considered a global pandemic. Does that mean every single person on Earth was infected? No. It just means it spanned multiple geographic regions.
fat_boy wrote:
How about inside a country. If two counties in England had outbreaks of foot and mouth would you call that national?
Again... Two? Probably not... Several in different parts of the country, sure. Like I said, it's a bit ambiguous. Doesn't mean it's wrong.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
fat_boy wrote:
and you said is that for ever
No - you said (as in the coldest EVER) (you even emphasized it by using capitals), I just pointed out that this was an exaggeration. Somewhat similar to claims in previous threads, e.g. that we had "centuries" of weather balloon data that should be preferred to satellite data. Given your tendency to berate various people for inaccuracies (you generally refer to them as lies) it seems reasonable to call you to account.
Regards David R --------------------------------------------------------------- "Every program eventually becomes rococo, and then rubble." - Alan Perlis The only valid measurement of code quality: WTFs/minute.
-
fat_boy wrote:
How about if there were floods in two parts of the world, would you call that global?
Two? Probably not. Three or four, if they might be related in terms of cause? Sure.
fat_boy wrote:
Or an outbreak of foot an mouth disease, would you call it global?
H1N1 was considered a global pandemic. Does that mean every single person on Earth was infected? No. It just means it spanned multiple geographic regions.
fat_boy wrote:
How about inside a country. If two counties in England had outbreaks of foot and mouth would you call that national?
Again... Two? Probably not... Several in different parts of the country, sure. Like I said, it's a bit ambiguous. Doesn't mean it's wrong.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)Ian Shlasko wrote:
Two? Probably not. Three or four, if they might be related in terms of cause? Sure.
Then you have a pretty fucking bizare deffinition of Global. How about in ecconomics, would you describe a recesion as global if it effected Brazil, Australia, Malasyia and Kazakstan because of a massive slump in metal ore prices?
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
You said "is that for ever?". Makes sense with quotes and a question mark?
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
fat_boy wrote:
You said "is that for ever?"
Never said such a thing - you are making a false attribution that is easily checked by looking through the replies.
Regards David R --------------------------------------------------------------- "Every program eventually becomes rococo, and then rubble." - Alan Perlis The only valid measurement of code quality: WTFs/minute.
-
fat_boy wrote:
You said "is that for ever?"
Never said such a thing - you are making a false attribution that is easily checked by looking through the replies.
Regards David R --------------------------------------------------------------- "Every program eventually becomes rococo, and then rubble." - Alan Perlis The only valid measurement of code quality: WTFs/minute.
It wasnt a litteral quote. You actually wrote: "It was colder in the Ice Age." In the form of a question. I replied by saying in human history. You then say is human history equal to scottish history. If all you want to do it be a pedant and create stupid arguments out of nothing then I shall for ever ignore you.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
Ian Shlasko wrote:
Two? Probably not. Three or four, if they might be related in terms of cause? Sure.
Then you have a pretty fucking bizare deffinition of Global. How about in ecconomics, would you describe a recesion as global if it effected Brazil, Australia, Malasyia and Kazakstan because of a massive slump in metal ore prices?
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
Nah, but if it hit the US, Japan, the UK, and a few other countries, sure... Not exactly the same thing, though, because in terms of economy, some countries are more significant than others.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
Nah, but if it hit the US, Japan, the UK, and a few other countries, sure... Not exactly the same thing, though, because in terms of economy, some countries are more significant than others.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)