Funny sayings quotes and statements:
-
fat_boy wrote:
Weakening Islam
It's a religion not a country or a region. There are American Muslims and they're just as much Americans as anyone else in this country.
fat_boy wrote:
As for the rest, they clearly show just how dimwitted many of these 'scientists' are.
Subject to your interpretation. It's easy to call someone names, but hard to prove them wrong.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
wolfbinary wrote:
It's a religion not a country or a region. There are American Muslims and they're just as much Americans as anyone else in this country.
Pointless statement that isnt relevant to my statement that weakening Islam by removing oil money from the regiona would be a good thing. (Especially Shia and Wassabi (the hot, spicy kind) Islam)
wolfbinary wrote:
Subject to your interpretation. It's easy to call someone names, but hard to prove them wrong.
You dont suppose that abject failure of their outlandish and alarmist statements is sufficient proof of their idiocy?
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
fat_boy wrote:
To feed a starving child is to exacerbate the world population problem. -Lamont Cole
I happen to agree with this one. Sending money to help the starving children creates a vicious circle as they grow up and have starving kids.
fat_boy wrote:
The right to have children should be a marketable commodity, bought and traded by individuals but absolutely limited by the state. -Kenneth Boulding, originator of the "Spaceship Earth" concept (as quoted by William Tucker in Progress and Privilege, 1982)
Gee, who is going to watch that no one has sex?
fat_boy wrote:
Free Enterprise really means rich people get richer. They have the freedom to exploit and psychologically rape their fellow human beings in the process.. Capitalism is destroying the earth. -Helen Caldicott, Union of Concerned Scientists
Well you better live in a cave and grow your own food, by the way you can only spread your message by word of mouth. Got to get back to work to pay for my house and car, so I can drive to the burger joint.
-
fat_boy wrote:
Before 1985, mankind will enter a genuine age of scarcity.in which the accessible supplies of many key minerals will be facing depletion.
Helium. Have you heard about this? It's completely non-renewable, and humans are going to run out very soon and nobody even cares... It's a problem mainly because it's used as a coolant in technologies like MRI and NMR and the Large Hadron Collider and such.
-
Isn't Helium the most abundant ellement in the universe?
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
It's the second most abundant in the Universe, but certainly not so on Earth.
-
Mass sterilisaiton os probably the answer. But it'll be a brave politician to suggest it!
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
Start with Africa. They'll "need" less "help" after that. Also, then maybe my future tax money will be put to better use.
tax money would then go to more pockets.
-
tax money would then go to more pockets.
-
It's the second most abundant in the Universe, but certainly not so on Earth.
-
wolfbinary wrote:
It's a religion not a country or a region. There are American Muslims and they're just as much Americans as anyone else in this country.
Pointless statement that isnt relevant to my statement that weakening Islam by removing oil money from the regiona would be a good thing. (Especially Shia and Wassabi (the hot, spicy kind) Islam)
wolfbinary wrote:
Subject to your interpretation. It's easy to call someone names, but hard to prove them wrong.
You dont suppose that abject failure of their outlandish and alarmist statements is sufficient proof of their idiocy?
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
fat_boy wrote:
Pointless statement that isnt relevant to my statement that weakening Islam by removing oil money from the regiona would be a good thing. (Especially Shia and Wassabi (the hot, spicy kind) Islam)
Not when it smacks of bigotry. It won't weaken a religion. Your statement makes no sense at all. That's like saying 9/11 weakened Christianity? It sounds like you're trying to say Islam is terrorism.
fat_boy wrote:
You dont suppose that abject failure of their outlandish and alarmist statements is sufficient proof of their idiocy?
When scientists make conclusions it doesn't make them beyond reproach or disproof. They acknowledge that. That's called science. When you have so many scientists coming to the same conclusion to the point that most agree you have a scientific conclusion. For people to accept something like AGW people will have to die. You're continued posts on the subject prove that for your own point of view. I'm not too concerned about AGW because it will be generations to come that have to deal with past generations idiocy. I'm not surprised when people avoid responsibility for doing things. That's how I see your reaction to things. Our lives have an impact on the world and denying it is believing in illusions. Taking responsibility doesn't mean destroying our way of life, but changing the way we get to it. AWG doesn't really matter because fossil fuels have a limitation of being planet based and not space based capable.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
-
Perhaps we need giant space hoover to suck it all up.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
Hrmm, that sounds like quite the engineering challenge.
-
fat_boy wrote:
Pointless statement that isnt relevant to my statement that weakening Islam by removing oil money from the regiona would be a good thing. (Especially Shia and Wassabi (the hot, spicy kind) Islam)
Not when it smacks of bigotry. It won't weaken a religion. Your statement makes no sense at all. That's like saying 9/11 weakened Christianity? It sounds like you're trying to say Islam is terrorism.
fat_boy wrote:
You dont suppose that abject failure of their outlandish and alarmist statements is sufficient proof of their idiocy?
When scientists make conclusions it doesn't make them beyond reproach or disproof. They acknowledge that. That's called science. When you have so many scientists coming to the same conclusion to the point that most agree you have a scientific conclusion. For people to accept something like AGW people will have to die. You're continued posts on the subject prove that for your own point of view. I'm not too concerned about AGW because it will be generations to come that have to deal with past generations idiocy. I'm not surprised when people avoid responsibility for doing things. That's how I see your reaction to things. Our lives have an impact on the world and denying it is believing in illusions. Taking responsibility doesn't mean destroying our way of life, but changing the way we get to it. AWG doesn't really matter because fossil fuels have a limitation of being planet based and not space based capable.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
Unfortunately, Islam IS terrorism today. Its been hijacked and abused by derranged psychopaths.
wolfbinary wrote:
When you have so many scientists coming to the same conclusion to the point that most agree you have a scientific conclusion
Thats such complete crap I am surprised you can countenance writing it. Scientific counclusion is by experimentation. Anything else is opinion.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
Hrmm, that sounds like quite the engineering challenge.
-
Yes, but I am sure man will find a way. We are clever monkeys you know.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
Maybe, eventually. We'll have been mostly helium-free for a long time by that point though.
-
Unfortunately, Islam IS terrorism today. Its been hijacked and abused by derranged psychopaths.
wolfbinary wrote:
When you have so many scientists coming to the same conclusion to the point that most agree you have a scientific conclusion
Thats such complete crap I am surprised you can countenance writing it. Scientific counclusion is by experimentation. Anything else is opinion.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
fat_boy wrote:
Unfortunately, Islam IS terrorism today. Its been hijacked and abused by derranged psychopaths.
So what does that make the Muslims serving in our military? When anti-abortionists bomb clinics and cite the Christian bible as the source of their inspiration it doesn't make all Christians terrorists or the religion a terrorist religion. People use any words whether their own or someone else's to justify their actions.
fat_boy wrote:
Thats such complete crap I am surprised you can countenance writing it. Scientific counclusion is by experimentation. Anything else is opinion.
Experimentation is part of the method, no duh. Their opinions come from that. no Duh That's not hard to write. Just because you don't like their conclusions based on their experiments doesn't invalidate their findings. They're just telling people what they find and how to fix it.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
-
fat_boy wrote:
Unfortunately, Islam IS terrorism today. Its been hijacked and abused by derranged psychopaths.
So what does that make the Muslims serving in our military? When anti-abortionists bomb clinics and cite the Christian bible as the source of their inspiration it doesn't make all Christians terrorists or the religion a terrorist religion. People use any words whether their own or someone else's to justify their actions.
fat_boy wrote:
Thats such complete crap I am surprised you can countenance writing it. Scientific counclusion is by experimentation. Anything else is opinion.
Experimentation is part of the method, no duh. Their opinions come from that. no Duh That's not hard to write. Just because you don't like their conclusions based on their experiments doesn't invalidate their findings. They're just telling people what they find and how to fix it.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
wolfbinary wrote:
So what does that make the Muslims serving in our military?
Potential terrorists? In fact there was one in the US.
wolfbinary wrote:
it doesn't make all Christians terrorists or the religion a terrorist religion
Go back a few years...
wolfbinary wrote:
Experimentation is part of the method, no duh. Their opinions come from that. no Duh That's not hard to write. Just because you don't like their conclusions based on their experiments doesn't invalidate their findings. They're just telling people what they find and how to fix it.
Do you often have to resort to 'valley speak' in order to communicate? You do realise that you sound like a stupid spoilt girl when you use it. Anywaway, and momentarially distracting my self from the nausea that arrises whenever I, choke, read, gag, valley speak, there havent been any experiements.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
Isn't Helium the most abundant ellement in the universe?
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
Gee, another sign of your ignorance about science. Where did you say you got your engineering degree? Send in a few box tops?
Once you agree to clans, tribes, governments...you've opted for socialism. The rest is just details.
Haaa, sigh, what a typical response from an dweeby internet twerp. How did people like you get made? How did you end up as such a twat? Did you miss out on something when you were young? Some normal part of developement that allows for the vageries of memory or is it that the internet gives you sufficient anonymity that you think you can act any way you like? Really, grow up. The real world is very different from the peculier place you inhabit.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
-
Haaa, sigh, what a typical response from an dweeby internet twerp. How did people like you get made? How did you end up as such a twat? Did you miss out on something when you were young? Some normal part of developement that allows for the vageries of memory or is it that the internet gives you sufficient anonymity that you think you can act any way you like? Really, grow up. The real world is very different from the peculier place you inhabit.
Morality is indistinguishable from social proscription
That's really rich coming from you. You paste this place with tons of posts that show you clearly don't understand what you're talking about. You're rapidly reaching par with Captain Poopy Pants.
Once you agree to clans, tribes, governments...you've opted for socialism. The rest is just details.
-
That's really rich coming from you. You paste this place with tons of posts that show you clearly don't understand what you're talking about. You're rapidly reaching par with Captain Poopy Pants.
Once you agree to clans, tribes, governments...you've opted for socialism. The rest is just details.