Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. .NET (Core and Framework)
  4. Editions in VSTS

Editions in VSTS

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved .NET (Core and Framework)
questioncollaborationarchitecture
3 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    NetQuestions
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi, I have one more question on VSTS. Was it really necessary to come up with multiple editions of VSTS like architecture, development, test instead of just one team suite which comprises of all. Was it because of size. or is it for the scenario where architects do only designing, developers only code and build and testers only test ... and so based on the role, they need to install only the necessary edition? Regards, NetQuestions

    P T 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • N NetQuestions

      Hi, I have one more question on VSTS. Was it really necessary to come up with multiple editions of VSTS like architecture, development, test instead of just one team suite which comprises of all. Was it because of size. or is it for the scenario where architects do only designing, developers only code and build and testers only test ... and so based on the role, they need to install only the necessary edition? Regards, NetQuestions

      P Offline
      P Offline
      Pete OHanlon
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      NetQuestions wrote:

      Was it because of size.

      The cynic in me says that it's because of pricing.

      I have CDO, it's OCD with the letters in the right order; just as they ruddy well should be

      Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads

      My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N NetQuestions

        Hi, I have one more question on VSTS. Was it really necessary to come up with multiple editions of VSTS like architecture, development, test instead of just one team suite which comprises of all. Was it because of size. or is it for the scenario where architects do only designing, developers only code and build and testers only test ... and so based on the role, they need to install only the necessary edition? Regards, NetQuestions

        T Offline
        T Offline
        The Man from U N C L E
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I think someone at MSHQ just got carried away with big team mentality. VS 2010 has a much simpler model where the price scales up with the scope of the install, with a separate track for dedicated testers. It's all about the money really.

        If you have knowledge, let others light their candles at it. Margaret Fuller (1810 - 1850) [My Articles]  [My Website]

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups