Ah the irony of it
-
Because with government run health care, everyone gets help.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
Since he barely knows how to read CSS can converse with someone else. After having read the damn thing or enough of it to destroy anyone's arguments about it I can say it leaves a lot to be ultimately decided and what the administration says about it is true. Since everyone will need health care at some point in their life the providing mechanism isn't all that important. Even the CBO says it will reduce the deficit and if CSS cares at all about that he'd be for it. Repealing it will add to the deficit or so the CBO also says. Don't believe me look it uphttp://www.cbo.gov/publications/collections/health.cfm[^]. Irony is lost on him don't waste your time.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
-
No, they don't. Obamacare is just a mandate to buy insurance from the same big insurance companies that have been trumping you like a cheap whore. Ontop of that they are raising their rates (which oboomboo promised wouldn't happen). Also, we are going bankrupt, any tax money that goes into this is already spent and it just isn't going to work. You will get an asprin for a heart attack. You will get a free abortion, you will get free vaccines, you will get free SSRIs and opiates, but you will not get healthcare.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
What about Europe and how does it relate to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act signed by obama?
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
Since he barely knows how to read CSS can converse with someone else. After having read the damn thing or enough of it to destroy anyone's arguments about it I can say it leaves a lot to be ultimately decided and what the administration says about it is true. Since everyone will need health care at some point in their life the providing mechanism isn't all that important. Even the CBO says it will reduce the deficit and if CSS cares at all about that he'd be for it. Repealing it will add to the deficit or so the CBO also says. Don't believe me look it uphttp://www.cbo.gov/publications/collections/health.cfm[^]. Irony is lost on him don't waste your time.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
I find it hard to believe that there are really people out there that might be intelligent, but still believe everything the government says in spite of monumental corruption and criminality.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=529AD458-F859-AAB8-4D74EDC0FFA2DD0D[^] A tea party candidate who ran on repeal of Obama Care because it's a government take over of health care wants to know why he has to wait a month for his. He goes on to say how he's never worked for any employer who doesn't cover you on day one. That's funny I've never worked for anyone who did. Nice, what a tosser.
That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_
-
What about Europe and how does it relate to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act signed by obama?
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
Whats the big deal? Obamacare and the healthcare he gets from Congress are completely different in every way.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Whats the big deal?
Well, if I were against government funded healthcare, I certainly wouldn't be bleating to get it. Why doesn't he just pay for his healthcare from his own pocket, instead of stealing it from the pockets of the hard pressed middle classes?
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Whats the big deal?
Well, if I were against government funded healthcare, I certainly wouldn't be bleating to get it. Why doesn't he just pay for his healthcare from his own pocket, instead of stealing it from the pockets of the hard pressed middle classes?
ict558 wrote:
Well, if I were against government funded healthcare, I certainly wouldn't be bleating to get it.
Well, think of it this way. He poses a threat to criminal bankers and insurance companies and all the special interest that run obama. He wants to make sure he gets covered in case there are any "accidents". People like you and wolfbinary are just little liberals lashing out because their stupidity is being rejected.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
It's not really suprising. The teabaggers don't have a principled stand against government programs and spending. They don't like spending on people that they have decided are undeserving.
Majerus wrote:
It's not really suprising. The teabaggers don't have a principled stand against government programs and spending. They don't like spending on people that they have decided are undeserving.
What a load of fucking horseshit. Cutting all government programs relating to welfare and unessential regulatory beurocracies and general waste and corruption is the core of the Tea Party. You are a bigoted lefty who's stupidity is being rejected nationwide and around the world, and that makes you a winy little thing.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
harold aptroot wrote:
We have to buy insurance from big bad insurance companies.
Have a cookie.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
Majerus wrote:
It's not really suprising. The teabaggers don't have a principled stand against government programs and spending. They don't like spending on people that they have decided are undeserving.
What a load of fucking horseshit. Cutting all government programs relating to welfare and unessential regulatory beurocracies and general waste and corruption is the core of the Tea Party. You are a bigoted lefty who's stupidity is being rejected nationwide and around the world, and that makes you a winy little thing.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
Majerus wrote:
It's not really suprising. The teabaggers don't have a principled stand against government programs and spending. They don't like spending on people that they have decided are undeserving.
What a load of fucking horseshit. Cutting all government programs relating to welfare and unessential regulatory beurocracies and general waste and corruption is the core of the Tea Party. You are a bigoted lefty who's stupidity is being rejected nationwide and around the world, and that makes you a winy little thing.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Cutting all government programs relating to welfare and unessential regulatory beurocracies and general waste and corruption is the core of the Tea Party.
So who will decide which regulation is unessential? and what waste is general? What wil happen if people within this tiny govermment disagree about these?
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Cutting all government programs relating to welfare
In other words - benefits to people they think are undeserving.
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
unessential regulatory beurocracies and general waste and corruptio
Meaningless buzz words.
Majerus wrote:
In other words - benefits to people they think are undeserving.
Cutting all benefits in a responsible manner. Oh and by the way, not everybody gets benefits you know. They think those people are undeserving of them so they don't get any.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Cutting all government programs relating to welfare and unessential regulatory beurocracies and general waste and corruption is the core of the Tea Party.
So who will decide which regulation is unessential? and what waste is general? What wil happen if people within this tiny govermment disagree about these?
Josh Gray wrote:
So who will decide which regulation is unessential? and what waste is general? What wil happen if people within this tiny govermment disagree about these?
The Constitution is the framework of the government. If they are not enumerated a certain power under the Constitution then they cannot do it. Disagreements with the constitution are irrelevant.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
Josh Gray wrote:
So who will decide which regulation is unessential? and what waste is general? What wil happen if people within this tiny govermment disagree about these?
The Constitution is the framework of the government. If they are not enumerated a certain power under the Constitution then they cannot do it. Disagreements with the constitution are irrelevant.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Disagreements with the constitution are irrelevant.
What about disagreements reagarding the interpretation of the constitution?
There are no disagreements regarding the interpretation between real conservatives and constitutionalists. Any disagreements are between the good guys vs. the lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
There are no disagreements regarding the interpretation between real conservatives and constitutionalists. Any disagreements are between the good guys vs. the lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
There are no disagreements regarding the interpretation between real conservatives and constitutionalists. Any disagreements are between the good guys vs. the lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians.
But there will be disagreements, under what power will the 'good guys' be able to dismiss others as 'lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians'?
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
Disagreements with the constitution are irrelevant.
What about disagreements reagarding the interpretation of the constitution?
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
There are no disagreements regarding the interpretation between real conservatives and constitutionalists. Any disagreements are between the good guys vs. the lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians.
But there will be disagreements, under what power will the 'good guys' be able to dismiss others as 'lefties, crooks, and corrupt politicians'?