When is it OK to use deadly force against a minor?
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
the girl you were quietly watching from a dark corner
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
an entire room wallpapered with pictures of random girls that you secretly take pictures of in public
That is you and harold punk.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
the girl you were quietly watching from a dark corner
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
an entire room wallpapered with pictures of random girls that you secretly take pictures of in public
-
Here in Queensland, you can use deadly force basically when it's required to defend yourself against someone who is intent and capable of inflicting deadly force upon yourself. eg: A 16 year old 120kg islander boy with a machete is technically a minor, but you could reasonably believe that if he was intending to inflict deadly force he would likely be capable... Contrast this to a 40kg 16 year old unarmed boy.
I don't have ADHD, I have ADOS... Attention Deficit oooh SHINY!! If you like cars, check out the Booger Mobile blog | If you feel generous - make a donation to Camp Quality!!
-
That is you and harold punk.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
The back room as a mirror?
Join the cool kids - Come fold with us[^]
Trollslayer wrote:
The back room as a mirror?
Quite possibly. The Code Project is a forum for software developers, a profession to which the Captain aspires, but, evidently, lacks the aptitude to attain. Back Room discussions are about anything other than software development. The Back Room reflects an image of himself as being among his peers, there is no challenge to his professed expertise. Gratifying to the old ego, no doubt, but his choice of monicker reveals an awareness, at some level, of his inherent ineptitude.
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
That is you and harold punk.
Projection: a defense mechanism that involves taking our own unacceptable qualities or feelings and ascribing them to other people.
Five? Yes, I think so...
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
-
I'm not aware of any statues that make a distinction between defending yourself/others/your property against an adult attacker and a minor based specifically on age. Depending on the situation/locale 'reasonable fear for your life/grievous bodily harm' could come into play but that would be due to the attackers size, not his/her age directly.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
That is you and harold punk.
Projection: a defense mechanism that involves taking our own unacceptable qualities or feelings and ascribing them to other people.
ict558 wrote:
Projection
That's what you are doing.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
ict558 wrote:
Projection
That's what you are doing.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
I think the phrase you're looking for is "I know you are, but what am I?"
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels) -
I think the phrase you're looking for is "I know you are, but what am I?"
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)No, I'm saying ic boy is projecting himself on me and is a creepy stalker.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
No, I'm saying ic boy is projecting himself on me and is a creepy stalker.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
ict558 wrote:
Projection
That's what you are doing.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
That's what you are doing.
Sorry, I'm not the sad little loner who posted the 'stalker' remarks, they sprang from your imagination.
ict558 wrote:
Sorry, I'm not the sad little loner who posted the 'stalker' remarks
Oh but you are. You ARE a stalker, not someone who makes remarks about stalkers (which is what I did). You and harold, some fucked up shit in the world.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
No, I'm saying ic boy is projecting himself on me and is a creepy stalker.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
the girl you were quietly watching from a dark corner
CaptainSeeSharp wrote:
an entire room wallpapered with pictures of random girls that you secretly take pictures of in public
Note: CaptainSeeSharp wrote From your head, nuff said.
-
ict558 wrote:
Sorry, I'm not the sad little loner who posted the 'stalker' remarks
Oh but you are. You ARE a stalker, not someone who makes remarks about stalkers (which is what I did). You and harold, some fucked up shit in the world.
Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined (High Quality 2:14:01)[^] Watch the Fall of the Republic (High Quality 2:24:19)[^] The Truthbox[^]
-
That part is a given, isn't it?
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
-
ict558 wrote:
From your head, nuff said.
Head? I'm pretty sure he talks out of his arse most of the time